From: Ivan Khoronzhuk <ivan.khoronzhuk@linaro.org>
To: mugunthanvnm@ti.com
Cc: grygorii.strashko@ti.com, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
linux-omap@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Ivan Khoronzhuk <ivan.khoronzhuk@linaro.org>
Subject: [PATCH] net: ethernet: ti: cpsw: use var instead of func for usage count
Date: Tue, 14 Feb 2017 16:02:36 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1487080956-28661-1-git-send-email-ivan.khoronzhuk@linaro.org> (raw)
The usage count function is based on ndev_running flag that is
updated before calling ndo_open/close, but if ndo is called in
another place, as with suspend/resume, the counter is not changed,
that breaks sus/resume. For common resource no difference which
device is using it, does matter only device count. So, replace
usage count function on var and inc and dec it in ndo_open/close.
Signed-off-by: Ivan Khoronzhuk <ivan.khoronzhuk@linaro.org>
---
Based on net-next/master
drivers/net/ethernet/ti/cpsw.c | 42 ++++++++++++------------------------------
1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 30 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/ti/cpsw.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/ti/cpsw.c
index 503fa8a..e86f226 100644
--- a/drivers/net/ethernet/ti/cpsw.c
+++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/ti/cpsw.c
@@ -399,6 +399,7 @@ struct cpsw_common {
struct cpts *cpts;
int rx_ch_num, tx_ch_num;
int speed;
+ int usage_count;
};
struct cpsw_priv {
@@ -671,18 +672,6 @@ static void cpsw_intr_disable(struct cpsw_common *cpsw)
return;
}
-static int cpsw_get_usage_count(struct cpsw_common *cpsw)
-{
- u32 i;
- u32 usage_count = 0;
-
- for (i = 0; i < cpsw->data.slaves; i++)
- if (cpsw->slaves[i].ndev && netif_running(cpsw->slaves[i].ndev))
- usage_count++;
-
- return usage_count;
-}
-
static void cpsw_tx_handler(void *token, int len, int status)
{
struct netdev_queue *txq;
@@ -716,8 +705,7 @@ static void cpsw_rx_handler(void *token, int len, int status)
if (unlikely(status < 0) || unlikely(!netif_running(ndev))) {
/* In dual emac mode check for all interfaces */
- if (cpsw->data.dual_emac &&
- cpsw_get_usage_count(cpsw) &&
+ if (cpsw->data.dual_emac && cpsw->usage_count &&
(status >= 0)) {
/* The packet received is for the interface which
* is already down and the other interface is up
@@ -1492,11 +1480,8 @@ static int cpsw_ndo_open(struct net_device *ndev)
CPSW_MAJOR_VERSION(reg), CPSW_MINOR_VERSION(reg),
CPSW_RTL_VERSION(reg));
- /* Initialize host and slave ports.
- * Given ndev is marked as opened already, so init port only if 1 ndev
- * is opened
- */
- if (cpsw_get_usage_count(cpsw) < 2)
+ /* Initialize host and slave ports */
+ if (!cpsw->usage_count)
cpsw_init_host_port(priv);
for_each_slave(priv, cpsw_slave_open, priv);
@@ -1507,10 +1492,8 @@ static int cpsw_ndo_open(struct net_device *ndev)
cpsw_ale_add_vlan(cpsw->ale, cpsw->data.default_vlan,
ALE_ALL_PORTS, ALE_ALL_PORTS, 0, 0);
- /* Given ndev is marked as opened already, so if more ndev
- * are opened - no need to init shared resources.
- */
- if (cpsw_get_usage_count(cpsw) < 2) {
+ /* initialize shared resources for every ndev */
+ if (!cpsw->usage_count) {
/* disable priority elevation */
__raw_writel(0, &cpsw->regs->ptype);
@@ -1552,6 +1535,7 @@ static int cpsw_ndo_open(struct net_device *ndev)
cpdma_ctlr_start(cpsw->dma);
cpsw_intr_enable(cpsw);
+ cpsw->usage_count++;
return 0;
@@ -1572,10 +1556,7 @@ static int cpsw_ndo_stop(struct net_device *ndev)
netif_tx_stop_all_queues(priv->ndev);
netif_carrier_off(priv->ndev);
- /* Given ndev is marked as close already,
- * so disable shared resources if no open devices
- */
- if (!cpsw_get_usage_count(cpsw)) {
+ if (cpsw->usage_count <= 1) {
napi_disable(&cpsw->napi_rx);
napi_disable(&cpsw->napi_tx);
cpts_unregister(cpsw->cpts);
@@ -1588,6 +1569,7 @@ static int cpsw_ndo_stop(struct net_device *ndev)
if (cpsw_need_resplit(cpsw))
cpsw_split_res(ndev);
+ cpsw->usage_count--;
pm_runtime_put_sync(cpsw->dev);
return 0;
}
@@ -2393,7 +2375,7 @@ static int cpsw_resume_data_pass(struct net_device *ndev)
netif_dormant_off(slave->ndev);
/* After this receive is started */
- if (cpsw_get_usage_count(cpsw)) {
+ if (cpsw->usage_count) {
ret = cpsw_fill_rx_channels(priv);
if (ret)
return ret;
@@ -2447,7 +2429,7 @@ static int cpsw_set_channels(struct net_device *ndev,
}
}
- if (cpsw_get_usage_count(cpsw))
+ if (cpsw->usage_count)
cpsw_split_res(ndev);
ret = cpsw_resume_data_pass(ndev);
@@ -2529,7 +2511,7 @@ static int cpsw_set_ringparam(struct net_device *ndev,
cpdma_set_num_rx_descs(cpsw->dma, ering->rx_pending);
- if (cpsw_get_usage_count(cpsw))
+ if (cpsw->usage_count)
cpdma_chan_split_pool(cpsw->dma);
ret = cpsw_resume_data_pass(ndev);
--
2.7.4
next reply other threads:[~2017-02-14 14:03 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-02-14 14:02 Ivan Khoronzhuk [this message]
2017-02-15 3:30 ` [PATCH] net: ethernet: ti: cpsw: use var instead of func for usage count David Miller
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1487080956-28661-1-git-send-email-ivan.khoronzhuk@linaro.org \
--to=ivan.khoronzhuk@linaro.org \
--cc=grygorii.strashko@ti.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-omap@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mugunthanvnm@ti.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).