From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net>
To: Linux PM <linux-pm@vger.kernel.org>
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Srinivas Pandruvada <srinivas.pandruvada@linux.intel.com>
Subject: [PATCH 03/14] cpufreq: intel_pstate: Initialize pid_params statically
Date: Sun, 12 Mar 2017 18:14:51 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <2425284.PBSYUI062S@aspire.rjw.lan> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <5656785.7SEhxaGEOz@aspire.rjw.lan>
From: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Notice that both the existing struct cpu_defaults instances in which
PID parameters are actually initialized use the same values of those
parameters, so it is not really necessary to copy them over to
pid_params dynamically.
Instead, initialize pid_params statically with those values and
drop the unused pid_policy member from struct cpu_defaults along
with copy_pid_params() used for initializing it.
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
---
drivers/cpufreq/intel_pstate.c | 42 +++++++++--------------------------------
1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 32 deletions(-)
Index: linux-pm/drivers/cpufreq/intel_pstate.c
===================================================================
--- linux-pm.orig/drivers/cpufreq/intel_pstate.c
+++ linux-pm/drivers/cpufreq/intel_pstate.c
@@ -342,19 +342,26 @@ struct pstate_funcs {
/**
* struct cpu_defaults- Per CPU model default config data
- * @pid_policy: PID config data
* @funcs: Callback function data
*/
struct cpu_defaults {
- struct pstate_adjust_policy pid_policy;
struct pstate_funcs funcs;
};
static inline int32_t get_target_pstate_use_performance(struct cpudata *cpu);
static inline int32_t get_target_pstate_use_cpu_load(struct cpudata *cpu);
-static struct pstate_adjust_policy pid_params __read_mostly;
static struct pstate_funcs pstate_funcs __read_mostly;
+static struct pstate_adjust_policy pid_params __read_mostly = {
+ .sample_rate_ms = 10,
+ .sample_rate_ns = 10 * NSEC_PER_MSEC,
+ .deadband = 0,
+ .setpoint = 97,
+ .p_gain_pct = 20,
+ .d_gain_pct = 0,
+ .i_gain_pct = 0,
+};
+
static int hwp_active __read_mostly;
static bool per_cpu_limits __read_mostly;
@@ -1572,14 +1579,6 @@ static int knl_get_turbo_pstate(void)
}
static struct cpu_defaults core_params = {
- .pid_policy = {
- .sample_rate_ms = 10,
- .deadband = 0,
- .setpoint = 97,
- .p_gain_pct = 20,
- .d_gain_pct = 0,
- .i_gain_pct = 0,
- },
.funcs = {
.get_max = core_get_max_pstate,
.get_max_physical = core_get_max_pstate_physical,
@@ -1618,14 +1617,6 @@ static const struct cpu_defaults airmont
};
static const struct cpu_defaults knl_params = {
- .pid_policy = {
- .sample_rate_ms = 10,
- .deadband = 0,
- .setpoint = 97,
- .p_gain_pct = 20,
- .d_gain_pct = 0,
- .i_gain_pct = 0,
- },
.funcs = {
.get_max = core_get_max_pstate,
.get_max_physical = core_get_max_pstate_physical,
@@ -2506,17 +2497,6 @@ static int __init intel_pstate_msrs_not_
return 0;
}
-static void __init copy_pid_params(struct pstate_adjust_policy *policy)
-{
- pid_params.sample_rate_ms = policy->sample_rate_ms;
- pid_params.sample_rate_ns = pid_params.sample_rate_ms * NSEC_PER_MSEC;
- pid_params.p_gain_pct = policy->p_gain_pct;
- pid_params.i_gain_pct = policy->i_gain_pct;
- pid_params.d_gain_pct = policy->d_gain_pct;
- pid_params.deadband = policy->deadband;
- pid_params.setpoint = policy->setpoint;
-}
-
#ifdef CONFIG_ACPI
static void intel_pstate_use_acpi_profile(void)
{
@@ -2698,8 +2678,6 @@ static int __init intel_pstate_init(void
cpu_def = (struct cpu_defaults *)id->driver_data;
copy_cpu_funcs(&cpu_def->funcs);
- if (pstate_funcs.get_target_pstate == get_target_pstate_use_performance)
- copy_pid_params(&cpu_def->pid_policy);
if (intel_pstate_msrs_not_valid())
return -ENODEV;
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-03-12 17:33 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-03-12 17:11 [PATCH 00/14] cpufreq: intel_pstate: Fixes, cleanups and optimizations Rafael J. Wysocki
2017-03-12 17:12 ` [PATCH 01/14] cpufreq: intel_pstate: Update pid_params.sample_rate_ns in pid_param_set() Rafael J. Wysocki
2017-03-13 4:00 ` Viresh Kumar
2017-03-12 17:13 ` [PATCH 02/14] cpufreq: intel_pstate: Drop pointless initialization of PID parameters Rafael J. Wysocki
2017-03-12 17:14 ` Rafael J. Wysocki [this message]
2017-03-12 17:15 ` [PATCH 04/14] cpufreq: intel_pstate: Fold intel_pstate_reset_all_pid() into the caller Rafael J. Wysocki
2017-03-12 17:16 ` [PATCH 05/14] cpufreq: intel_pstate: Clean up intel_pstate_busy_pid_reset() Rafael J. Wysocki
2017-03-12 17:17 ` [PATCH 06/14] cpufreq: intel_pstate: Set HWP sampling interval once Rafael J. Wysocki
2017-03-12 17:18 ` [PATCH 07/14] cpufreq: intel_pstate: Skip unnecessary PID resets on init Rafael J. Wysocki
2017-03-12 17:19 ` [PATCH 08/14] cpufreq: intel_pstate: Drop driver_registered variable Rafael J. Wysocki
2017-03-12 17:20 ` [PATCH 09/14] cpufreq: intel_pstate: Modify check in intel_pstate_update_status() Rafael J. Wysocki
2017-03-12 17:21 ` [PATCH 10/14] cpufreq: intel_pstate: Use different utilization update callbacks Rafael J. Wysocki
2017-03-12 17:22 ` [PATCH 11/14] cpufreq: intel_pstate: Add update_util callback to pstate_funcs Rafael J. Wysocki
2017-03-12 17:23 ` [PATCH 12/14] cpufreq: intel_pstate: Move cpu_defaults definitions Rafael J. Wysocki
2017-03-12 17:23 ` [PATCH 13/14] cpufreq: intel_pstate: Drop struct cpu_defaults Rafael J. Wysocki
2017-03-12 17:26 ` [PATCH 14/14] cpufreq: intel_pstate: Introduce pid_in_use() Rafael J. Wysocki
2017-03-14 16:06 ` [PATCH 07/14] cpufreq: intel_pstate: Skip unnecessary PID resets on init Doug Smythies
2017-03-14 16:40 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2017-03-14 16:07 ` [PATCH 10/14] cpufreq: intel_pstate: Use different utilization update callbacks Doug Smythies
2017-03-14 16:41 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=2425284.PBSYUI062S@aspire.rjw.lan \
--to=rjw@rjwysocki.net \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=srinivas.pandruvada@linux.intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).