linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jeffrey Hugo <jhugo@codeaurora.org>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@arm.com>,
	Austin Christ <austinwc@codeaurora.org>,
	Tyler Baicar <tbaicar@codeaurora.org>,
	Jeffrey Hugo <jhugo@codeaurora.org>
Subject: [RFC 1/2] sched/fair: Fix load_balance() affinity redo path
Date: Fri, 12 May 2017 11:01:37 -0600	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1494608498-4538-2-git-send-email-jhugo@codeaurora.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1494608498-4538-1-git-send-email-jhugo@codeaurora.org>

If load_balance() fails to migrate any tasks because all tasks were
affined, load_balance() removes the source cpu from consideration and
attempts to redo and balance among the new subset of cpus.

There is a bug in this code path where the algorithm considers all active
cpus in the system (minus the source that was just masked out).  This is
not valid for two reasons: some active cpus may not be in the current
scheduling domain and one of the active cpus is dst_cpu. These cpus should
not be considered, as we cannot pull load from them.

Instead of failing out of load_balance(), we may end up redoing the search
with no valid cpus and incorrectly concluding the domain is balanced.
Additionally, if the group_imbalance flag was just set, it may also be
incorrectly unset, thus the flag will not be seen by other cpus in future
load_balance() runs as that algorithm intends.

Fix the check by removing cpus not in the current domain and the dst_cpu
from considertation, thus limiting the evaluation to valid remaining cpus
from which load might be migrated.

Signed-off-by: Austin Christ <austinwc@codeaurora.org>
Signed-off-by: Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Jeffrey Hugo <jhugo@codeaurora.org>
Tested-by: Tyler Baicar <tbaicar@codeaurora.org>
---
 kernel/sched/fair.c | 13 ++++++++++++-
 1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/kernel/sched/fair.c b/kernel/sched/fair.c
index d711093..8f783ba 100644
--- a/kernel/sched/fair.c
+++ b/kernel/sched/fair.c
@@ -8219,8 +8219,19 @@ static int load_balance(int this_cpu, struct rq *this_rq,
 
 		/* All tasks on this runqueue were pinned by CPU affinity */
 		if (unlikely(env.flags & LBF_ALL_PINNED)) {
+			struct cpumask tmp;
+
+			/* Cpumask of all initially possible busiest cpus. */
+			cpumask_copy(&tmp, sched_domain_span(env.sd));
+			cpumask_clear_cpu(env.dst_cpu, &tmp);
+
 			cpumask_clear_cpu(cpu_of(busiest), cpus);
-			if (!cpumask_empty(cpus)) {
+			/*
+			 * Go back to "redo" iff the load-balance cpumask
+			 * contains other potential busiest cpus for the
+			 * current sched domain.
+			 */
+			if (cpumask_intersects(cpus, &tmp)) {
 				env.loop = 0;
 				env.loop_break = sched_nr_migrate_break;
 				goto redo;
-- 
Qualcomm Datacenter Technologies as an affiliate of Qualcomm Technologies, Inc.
Qualcomm Technologies, Inc. is a member of the
Code Aurora Forum, a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project.

  reply	other threads:[~2017-05-12 17:02 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2017-05-12 17:01 [RFC 0/2] load_balance() fixes for affinity Jeffrey Hugo
2017-05-12 17:01 ` Jeffrey Hugo [this message]
2017-05-12 17:23   ` [RFC 1/2] sched/fair: Fix load_balance() affinity redo path Peter Zijlstra
2017-05-12 17:29     ` Jeffrey Hugo
2017-05-12 20:44       ` Peter Zijlstra
2017-05-12 20:54         ` Jeffrey Hugo
2017-05-12 20:47   ` Peter Zijlstra
2017-05-12 20:57     ` Jeffrey Hugo
2017-05-15 14:56       ` Dietmar Eggemann
2017-05-18 14:31         ` Jeffrey Hugo
2017-05-12 17:01 ` [RFC 2/2] sched/fair: Remove group imbalance from calculate_imbalance() Jeffrey Hugo

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1494608498-4538-2-git-send-email-jhugo@codeaurora.org \
    --to=jhugo@codeaurora.org \
    --cc=austinwc@codeaurora.org \
    --cc=dietmar.eggemann@arm.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=tbaicar@codeaurora.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).