[PATCH 4.4 30/58] packet: fix use-after-free in prb_retire_rx_blk_timer_expired() - Greg Kroah-Hartman

From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
	stable@vger.kernel.org, alexander.levin@verizon.com,
	Dave Jones <davej@codemonkey.org.uk>,
	"liujian (CE)" <liujian56@huawei.com>,
	Ding Tianhong <dingtianhong@huawei.com>,
	Willem de Bruijn <willemdebruijn.kernel@gmail.com>,
	Cong Wang <xiyou.wangcong@gmail.com>,
	"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>
Subject: [PATCH 4.4 30/58] packet: fix use-after-free in prb_retire_rx_blk_timer_expired()
Date: Wed,  9 Aug 2017 12:41:42 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170809194147.680683871@linuxfoundation.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20170809194146.501519882@linuxfoundation.org>

4.4-stable review patch.  If anyone has any objections, please let me know.

------------------

From: WANG Cong <xiyou.wangcong@gmail.com>


[ Upstream commit c800aaf8d869f2b9b47b10c5c312fe19f0a94042 ]

There are multiple reports showing we have a use-after-free in
the timer prb_retire_rx_blk_timer_expired(), where we use struct
tpacket_kbdq_core::pkbdq, a pg_vec, after it gets freed by
free_pg_vec().

The interesting part is it is not freed via packet_release() but
via packet_setsockopt(), which means we are not closing the socket.
Looking into the big and fat function packet_set_ring(), this could
happen if we satisfy the following conditions:

1. closing == 0, not on packet_release() path
2. req->tp_block_nr == 0, we don't allocate a new pg_vec
3. rx_ring->pg_vec is already set as V3, which means we already called
   packet_set_ring() wtih req->tp_block_nr > 0 previously
4. req->tp_frame_nr == 0, pass sanity check
5. po->mapped == 0, never called mmap()

In this scenario we are clearing the old rx_ring->pg_vec, so we need
to free this pg_vec, but we don't stop the timer on this path because
of closing==0.

The timer has to be stopped as long as we need to free pg_vec, therefore
the check on closing!=0 is wrong, we should check pg_vec!=NULL instead.

Thanks to liujian for testing different fixes.

Reported-by: alexander.levin@verizon.com
Reported-by: Dave Jones <davej@codemonkey.org.uk>
Reported-by: liujian (CE) <liujian56@huawei.com>
Tested-by: liujian (CE) <liujian56@huawei.com>
Cc: Ding Tianhong <dingtianhong@huawei.com>
Cc: Willem de Bruijn <willemdebruijn.kernel@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Cong Wang <xiyou.wangcong@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
---
 net/packet/af_packet.c |    2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

--- a/net/packet/af_packet.c
+++ b/net/packet/af_packet.c
@@ -4225,7 +4225,7 @@ static int packet_set_ring(struct sock *
 		register_prot_hook(sk);
 	}
 	spin_unlock(&po->bind_lock);
-	if (closing && (po->tp_version > TPACKET_V2)) {
+	if (pg_vec && (po->tp_version > TPACKET_V2)) {
 		/* Because we don't support block-based V3 on tx-ring */
 		if (!tx_ring)
 			prb_shutdown_retire_blk_timer(po, rb_queue);
