From: Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org>
To: x86@kernel.org
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>,
Brian Gerst <brgerst@gmail.com>,
Andrew Cooper <andrew.cooper3@citrix.com>,
Juergen Gross <jgross@suse.com>,
Boris Ostrovsky <boris.ostrovsky@oracle.com>,
Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>,
Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org>
Subject: [RFC 08/17] x86/asm/64: De-Xen-ify our NMI code
Date: Wed, 6 Sep 2017 14:36:53 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <f0d45728756ebe8540edcc7b0da57bb77b3b719e.1504733277.git.luto@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <cover.1504733277.git.luto@kernel.org>
In-Reply-To: <cover.1504733277.git.luto@kernel.org>
Xen PV is fundamentally incompatible with our fancy NMI code: it
doesn't use IST at all, and Xen entries clobber two stack slots
below the hardware frame.
Drop Xen PV support from our NMI code entirely.
XXX: Juergen: could you write and test the tiny patch needed to
make Xen PV have a xen_nmi entry that handles NMIs? I don't know
how to test it.
Cc: Juergen Gross <jgross@suse.com>
Cc: Boris Ostrovsky <boris.ostrovsky@oracle.com>
Signed-off-by: Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org>
---
arch/x86/entry/entry_64.S | 41 +++++++++++++++++------------------------
1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 24 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/x86/entry/entry_64.S b/arch/x86/entry/entry_64.S
index a9e318f7cc9b..c81e05fb999e 100644
--- a/arch/x86/entry/entry_64.S
+++ b/arch/x86/entry/entry_64.S
@@ -1171,21 +1171,12 @@ ENTRY(error_exit)
jmp retint_user
END(error_exit)
-/* Runs on exception stack */
+/*
+ * Runs on exception stack. Xen PV does not go through this path at all,
+ * so we can use real assembly here.
+ */
ENTRY(nmi)
/*
- * Fix up the exception frame if we're on Xen.
- * PARAVIRT_ADJUST_EXCEPTION_FRAME is guaranteed to push at most
- * one value to the stack on native, so it may clobber the rdx
- * scratch slot, but it won't clobber any of the important
- * slots past it.
- *
- * Xen is a different story, because the Xen frame itself overlaps
- * the "NMI executing" variable.
- */
- PARAVIRT_ADJUST_EXCEPTION_FRAME
-
- /*
* We allow breakpoints in NMIs. If a breakpoint occurs, then
* the iretq it performs will take us out of NMI context.
* This means that we can have nested NMIs where the next
@@ -1240,7 +1231,7 @@ ENTRY(nmi)
* stacks lest we corrupt the "NMI executing" variable.
*/
- SWAPGS_UNSAFE_STACK
+ swapgs
cld
movq %rsp, %rdx
movq PER_CPU_VAR(cpu_current_top_of_stack), %rsp
@@ -1402,7 +1393,7 @@ nested_nmi_out:
popq %rdx
/* We are returning to kernel mode, so this cannot result in a fault. */
- INTERRUPT_RETURN
+ iretq
first_nmi:
/* Restore rdx. */
@@ -1432,7 +1423,7 @@ first_nmi:
pushfq /* RFLAGS */
pushq $__KERNEL_CS /* CS */
pushq $1f /* RIP */
- INTERRUPT_RETURN /* continues at repeat_nmi below */
+ iretq /* continues at repeat_nmi below */
1:
#endif
@@ -1502,20 +1493,22 @@ nmi_restore:
/*
* Clear "NMI executing". Set DF first so that we can easily
* distinguish the remaining code between here and IRET from
- * the SYSCALL entry and exit paths. On a native kernel, we
- * could just inspect RIP, but, on paravirt kernels,
- * INTERRUPT_RETURN can translate into a jump into a
- * hypercall page.
+ * the SYSCALL entry and exit paths.
+ *
+ * We arguably should just inspect RIP instead, but I (Andy) wrote
+ * this code when I had the misapprehension that Xen PV supported
+ * NMIs, and Xen PV would break that approach.
*/
std
movq $0, 5*8(%rsp) /* clear "NMI executing" */
/*
- * INTERRUPT_RETURN reads the "iret" frame and exits the NMI
- * stack in a single instruction. We are returning to kernel
- * mode, so this cannot result in a fault.
+ * iretq reads the "iret" frame and exits the NMI stack in a
+ * single instruction. We are returning to kernel mode, so this
+ * cannot result in a fault. Similarly, we don't need to worry
+ * about espfix64 on the way back to kernel mode.
*/
- INTERRUPT_RETURN
+ iretq
END(nmi)
ENTRY(ignore_sysret)
--
2.13.5
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-09-06 21:37 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 34+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-09-06 21:36 [RFC 00/17] Pile o' entry stack changes Andy Lutomirski
2017-09-06 21:36 ` [RFC 01/17] x86/asm/64: Remove the restore_c_regs_and_iret label Andy Lutomirski
2017-09-07 9:40 ` Borislav Petkov
2017-09-07 9:46 ` Ingo Molnar
2017-09-07 9:49 ` Ingo Molnar
2017-09-07 9:57 ` Borislav Petkov
2017-09-07 10:29 ` Ingo Molnar
2017-09-06 21:36 ` [RFC 02/17] x86/asm/64: Split the iret-to-user and iret-to-kernel paths Andy Lutomirski
2017-09-06 21:36 ` [RFC 03/17] x86/asm/64: Move SWAPGS into the common iret-to-usermode path Andy Lutomirski
2017-09-06 21:36 ` [RFC 04/17] x86/asm/64: Simplify reg restore code in the standard IRET paths Andy Lutomirski
2017-09-12 20:05 ` Josh Poimboeuf
2017-09-06 21:36 ` [RFC 05/17] x86/asm/64: Shrink paranoid_exit_restore and make labels local Andy Lutomirski
2017-09-06 21:36 ` [RFC 06/17] x86/asm/64: Use pop instead of movq in syscall_return_via_sysret Andy Lutomirski
2017-09-06 21:36 ` [RFC 07/17] x86/asm/64: Merge the fast and slow SYSRET paths Andy Lutomirski
2017-09-06 21:36 ` Andy Lutomirski [this message]
2017-09-07 9:34 ` [RFC 08/17] x86/asm/64: De-Xen-ify our NMI code Juergen Gross
2017-09-07 18:38 ` Andy Lutomirski
2017-09-08 4:26 ` Juergen Gross
2017-09-06 21:36 ` [RFC 09/17] x86/asm/32: Pull MSR_IA32_SYSENTER_CS update code out of native_load_sp0() Andy Lutomirski
2017-09-12 20:06 ` Josh Poimboeuf
2017-09-06 21:36 ` [RFC 10/17] x86/asm/64: Pass sp0 directly to load_sp0() Andy Lutomirski
2017-09-06 21:36 ` [RFC 11/17] x86/asm: Add task_top_of_stack() to find the top of a task's stack Andy Lutomirski
2017-09-06 21:36 ` [RFC 12/17] x86/xen/64: Clean up SP code in cpu_initialize_context() Andy Lutomirski
2017-09-12 20:09 ` Josh Poimboeuf
2017-09-06 21:36 ` [RFC 13/17] x86/boot/64: Stop initializing TSS.sp0 at boot Andy Lutomirski
2017-09-06 21:36 ` [RFC 14/17] x86/asm/64: Remove all remaining direct thread_struct::sp0 reads Andy Lutomirski
2017-09-06 21:37 ` [RFC 15/17] x86/boot/32: Fix cpu_current_top_of_stack initialization at boot Andy Lutomirski
2017-09-06 21:37 ` [RFC 16/17] x86/asm/64: Remove thread_struct::sp0 Andy Lutomirski
2017-09-06 21:37 ` [RFC 17/17] x86/traps: Use a new on_thread_stack() helper to clean up an assertion Andy Lutomirski
2017-09-12 20:11 ` Josh Poimboeuf
2017-09-12 20:25 ` Andrew Cooper
2017-09-06 22:16 ` [RFC 00/17] Pile o' entry stack changes Andi Kleen
2017-09-07 0:01 ` Andy Lutomirski
2017-09-07 7:04 ` Ingo Molnar
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=f0d45728756ebe8540edcc7b0da57bb77b3b719e.1504733277.git.luto@kernel.org \
--to=luto@kernel.org \
--cc=andrew.cooper3@citrix.com \
--cc=boris.ostrovsky@oracle.com \
--cc=bp@alien8.de \
--cc=brgerst@gmail.com \
--cc=jgross@suse.com \
--cc=keescook@chromium.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).