From: Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org>
To: x86@kernel.org
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>,
Brian Gerst <brgerst@gmail.com>,
Andrew Cooper <andrew.cooper3@citrix.com>,
Juergen Gross <jgross@suse.com>,
Boris Ostrovsky <boris.ostrovsky@oracle.com>,
Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>,
Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org>
Subject: [RFC 03/17] x86/asm/64: Move SWAPGS into the common iret-to-usermode path
Date: Wed, 6 Sep 2017 14:36:48 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <7e30d0e6ddc459b049e1473f160d84f9a7195f4b.1504733277.git.luto@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <cover.1504733277.git.luto@kernel.org>
In-Reply-To: <cover.1504733277.git.luto@kernel.org>
All of the code paths that ended up doing IRET to usermode did
SWAPGS immediately beforehand. Move the SWAPGS into the common
code.
Signed-off-by: Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org>
---
arch/x86/entry/entry_64.S | 26 ++++++++++----------------
arch/x86/entry/entry_64_compat.S | 3 +--
2 files changed, 11 insertions(+), 18 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/x86/entry/entry_64.S b/arch/x86/entry/entry_64.S
index 34156d50c3d6..2cd01ed9cd59 100644
--- a/arch/x86/entry/entry_64.S
+++ b/arch/x86/entry/entry_64.S
@@ -249,7 +249,7 @@ return_from_SYSCALL_64:
movq RCX(%rsp), %rcx
movq RIP(%rsp), %r11
cmpq %rcx, %r11 /* RCX == RIP */
- jne opportunistic_sysret_failed
+ jne swapgs_restore_regs_and_return_to_usermode
/*
* On Intel CPUs, SYSRET with non-canonical RCX/RIP will #GP
@@ -267,14 +267,14 @@ return_from_SYSCALL_64:
/* If this changed %rcx, it was not canonical */
cmpq %rcx, %r11
- jne opportunistic_sysret_failed
+ jne swapgs_restore_regs_and_return_to_usermode
cmpq $__USER_CS, CS(%rsp) /* CS must match SYSRET */
- jne opportunistic_sysret_failed
+ jne swapgs_restore_regs_and_return_to_usermode
movq R11(%rsp), %r11
cmpq %r11, EFLAGS(%rsp) /* R11 == RFLAGS */
- jne opportunistic_sysret_failed
+ jne swapgs_restore_regs_and_return_to_usermode
/*
* SYSCALL clears RF when it saves RFLAGS in R11 and SYSRET cannot
@@ -295,12 +295,12 @@ return_from_SYSCALL_64:
* would never get past 'stuck_here'.
*/
testq $(X86_EFLAGS_RF|X86_EFLAGS_TF), %r11
- jnz opportunistic_sysret_failed
+ jnz swapgs_restore_regs_and_return_to_usermode
/* nothing to check for RSP */
cmpq $__USER_DS, SS(%rsp) /* SS must match SYSRET */
- jne opportunistic_sysret_failed
+ jne swapgs_restore_regs_and_return_to_usermode
/*
* We win! This label is here just for ease of understanding
@@ -312,10 +312,6 @@ syscall_return_via_sysret:
RESTORE_C_REGS_EXCEPT_RCX_R11
movq RSP(%rsp), %rsp
USERGS_SYSRET64
-
-opportunistic_sysret_failed:
- SWAPGS
- jmp restore_regs_and_return_to_usermode
END(entry_SYSCALL_64)
ENTRY(stub_ptregs_64)
@@ -411,8 +407,7 @@ ENTRY(ret_from_fork)
movq %rsp, %rdi
call syscall_return_slowpath /* returns with IRQs disabled */
TRACE_IRQS_ON /* user mode is traced as IRQS on */
- SWAPGS
- jmp restore_regs_and_return_to_usermode
+ jmp swapgs_restore_regs_and_return_to_usermode
1:
/* kernel thread */
@@ -523,9 +518,9 @@ GLOBAL(retint_user)
mov %rsp,%rdi
call prepare_exit_to_usermode
TRACE_IRQS_IRETQ
- SWAPGS
-GLOBAL(restore_regs_and_return_to_usermode)
+GLOBAL(swapgs_restore_regs_and_return_to_usermode)
+ SWAPGS
RESTORE_EXTRA_REGS
RESTORE_C_REGS
REMOVE_PT_GPREGS_FROM_STACK 8
@@ -1265,8 +1260,7 @@ ENTRY(nmi)
* Return back to user mode. We must *not* do the normal exit
* work, because we don't want to enable interrupts.
*/
- SWAPGS
- jmp restore_regs_and_return_to_usermode
+ jmp swapgs_restore_regs_and_return_to_usermode
.Lnmi_from_kernel:
/*
diff --git a/arch/x86/entry/entry_64_compat.S b/arch/x86/entry/entry_64_compat.S
index e4ab8ffa94b1..72e143497ece 100644
--- a/arch/x86/entry/entry_64_compat.S
+++ b/arch/x86/entry/entry_64_compat.S
@@ -337,8 +337,7 @@ ENTRY(entry_INT80_compat)
/* Go back to user mode. */
TRACE_IRQS_ON
- SWAPGS
- jmp restore_regs_and_return_to_usermode
+ jmp swapgs_restore_regs_and_return_to_usermode
END(entry_INT80_compat)
ALIGN
--
2.13.5
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-09-06 21:40 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 34+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-09-06 21:36 [RFC 00/17] Pile o' entry stack changes Andy Lutomirski
2017-09-06 21:36 ` [RFC 01/17] x86/asm/64: Remove the restore_c_regs_and_iret label Andy Lutomirski
2017-09-07 9:40 ` Borislav Petkov
2017-09-07 9:46 ` Ingo Molnar
2017-09-07 9:49 ` Ingo Molnar
2017-09-07 9:57 ` Borislav Petkov
2017-09-07 10:29 ` Ingo Molnar
2017-09-06 21:36 ` [RFC 02/17] x86/asm/64: Split the iret-to-user and iret-to-kernel paths Andy Lutomirski
2017-09-06 21:36 ` Andy Lutomirski [this message]
2017-09-06 21:36 ` [RFC 04/17] x86/asm/64: Simplify reg restore code in the standard IRET paths Andy Lutomirski
2017-09-12 20:05 ` Josh Poimboeuf
2017-09-06 21:36 ` [RFC 05/17] x86/asm/64: Shrink paranoid_exit_restore and make labels local Andy Lutomirski
2017-09-06 21:36 ` [RFC 06/17] x86/asm/64: Use pop instead of movq in syscall_return_via_sysret Andy Lutomirski
2017-09-06 21:36 ` [RFC 07/17] x86/asm/64: Merge the fast and slow SYSRET paths Andy Lutomirski
2017-09-06 21:36 ` [RFC 08/17] x86/asm/64: De-Xen-ify our NMI code Andy Lutomirski
2017-09-07 9:34 ` Juergen Gross
2017-09-07 18:38 ` Andy Lutomirski
2017-09-08 4:26 ` Juergen Gross
2017-09-06 21:36 ` [RFC 09/17] x86/asm/32: Pull MSR_IA32_SYSENTER_CS update code out of native_load_sp0() Andy Lutomirski
2017-09-12 20:06 ` Josh Poimboeuf
2017-09-06 21:36 ` [RFC 10/17] x86/asm/64: Pass sp0 directly to load_sp0() Andy Lutomirski
2017-09-06 21:36 ` [RFC 11/17] x86/asm: Add task_top_of_stack() to find the top of a task's stack Andy Lutomirski
2017-09-06 21:36 ` [RFC 12/17] x86/xen/64: Clean up SP code in cpu_initialize_context() Andy Lutomirski
2017-09-12 20:09 ` Josh Poimboeuf
2017-09-06 21:36 ` [RFC 13/17] x86/boot/64: Stop initializing TSS.sp0 at boot Andy Lutomirski
2017-09-06 21:36 ` [RFC 14/17] x86/asm/64: Remove all remaining direct thread_struct::sp0 reads Andy Lutomirski
2017-09-06 21:37 ` [RFC 15/17] x86/boot/32: Fix cpu_current_top_of_stack initialization at boot Andy Lutomirski
2017-09-06 21:37 ` [RFC 16/17] x86/asm/64: Remove thread_struct::sp0 Andy Lutomirski
2017-09-06 21:37 ` [RFC 17/17] x86/traps: Use a new on_thread_stack() helper to clean up an assertion Andy Lutomirski
2017-09-12 20:11 ` Josh Poimboeuf
2017-09-12 20:25 ` Andrew Cooper
2017-09-06 22:16 ` [RFC 00/17] Pile o' entry stack changes Andi Kleen
2017-09-07 0:01 ` Andy Lutomirski
2017-09-07 7:04 ` Ingo Molnar
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=7e30d0e6ddc459b049e1473f160d84f9a7195f4b.1504733277.git.luto@kernel.org \
--to=luto@kernel.org \
--cc=andrew.cooper3@citrix.com \
--cc=boris.ostrovsky@oracle.com \
--cc=bp@alien8.de \
--cc=brgerst@gmail.com \
--cc=jgross@suse.com \
--cc=keescook@chromium.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).