From: Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@google.com>
To: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: tj@kernel.org, cl@linux.com, mingo@redhat.com, hpa@zytor.com,
bp@suse.de, luto@kernel.org, kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com,
thgarnie@google.com, jpoimboe@redhat.com, minipli@googlemail.com,
me@kylehuey.com, namit@vmware.com, tklauser@distanz.ch,
thomas.lendacky@amd.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
x86@kernel.org, Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@google.com>,
Borislav Petkov <bpetkov@suse.de>
Subject: [PATCH] x86/process: define cpu_tss_rw in same section as declaration
Date: Wed, 3 Jan 2018 12:39:52 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20180103203954.183360-1-ndesaulniers@google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <alpine.DEB.2.20.1801032025310.1957@nanos>
cpu_tss_rw was declared with the macro
DECLARE_PER_CPU_PAGE_ALIGNED
but then defined with the macro
DEFINE_PER_CPU_SHARED_ALIGNED
leading to section mismatch warnings. Prefer the macro
DEFINE_PER_CPU_PAGE_ALIGNED
Suggested-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Signed-off-by: Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@google.com>
---
arch/x86/kernel/process.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/process.c b/arch/x86/kernel/process.c
index aed9d94bd46f..832a6acd730f 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/process.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/process.c
@@ -47,7 +47,7 @@
* section. Since TSS's are completely CPU-local, we want them
* on exact cacheline boundaries, to eliminate cacheline ping-pong.
*/
-__visible DEFINE_PER_CPU_SHARED_ALIGNED(struct tss_struct, cpu_tss_rw) = {
+__visible DEFINE_PER_CPU_PAGE_ALIGNED(struct tss_struct, cpu_tss_rw) = {
.x86_tss = {
/*
* .sp0 is only used when entering ring 0 from a lower
--
2.16.0.rc0.223.g4a4ac83678-goog
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-01-03 20:40 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-01-02 18:51 correct section for cpu_tss_rw? Nick Desaulniers
2018-01-03 19:27 ` Thomas Gleixner
2018-01-03 20:39 ` Nick Desaulniers [this message]
2018-01-03 22:25 ` [tip:x86/pti] x86/process: Define cpu_tss_rw in same section as declaration tip-bot for Nick Desaulniers
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20180103203954.183360-1-ndesaulniers@google.com \
--to=ndesaulniers@google.com \
--cc=bp@suse.de \
--cc=bpetkov@suse.de \
--cc=cl@linux.com \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=jpoimboe@redhat.com \
--cc=kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=luto@kernel.org \
--cc=me@kylehuey.com \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=minipli@googlemail.com \
--cc=namit@vmware.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=thgarnie@google.com \
--cc=thomas.lendacky@amd.com \
--cc=tj@kernel.org \
--cc=tklauser@distanz.ch \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).