linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Peter Rosin <peda@axentia.se>
To: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Cc: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>,
	Peter Rosin <peda@axentia.se>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [RESEND PATCH] mux: core: fix double get_device()
Date: Mon,  8 Jan 2018 19:19:52 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20180108181952.29194-1-peda@axentia.se> (raw)

From: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>

class_find_device already does a get_device on the returned device.
So the device returned by of_find_mux_chip_by_node is already referenced
and we should not reference it again (and unref it on error).

Signed-off-by: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Peter Rosin <peda@axentia.se>
---
 drivers/mux/core.c | 4 +++-
 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

Hi Greg,

Perhaps this was ignored due to more important stuff?

Original message below:

Here is a fix for 4.15, and it should perhaps also go to
stable?

It's been in -next for a couple of weeks w/o complaints.

Cheers,
Peter

diff --git a/drivers/mux/core.c b/drivers/mux/core.c
index 2260063b0ea8..6e5cf9d9cd99 100644
--- a/drivers/mux/core.c
+++ b/drivers/mux/core.c
@@ -413,6 +413,7 @@ static int of_dev_node_match(struct device *dev, const void *data)
 	return dev->of_node == data;
 }
 
+/* Note this function returns a reference to the mux_chip dev. */
 static struct mux_chip *of_find_mux_chip_by_node(struct device_node *np)
 {
 	struct device *dev;
@@ -466,6 +467,7 @@ struct mux_control *mux_control_get(struct device *dev, const char *mux_name)
 	    (!args.args_count && (mux_chip->controllers > 1))) {
 		dev_err(dev, "%pOF: wrong #mux-control-cells for %pOF\n",
 			np, args.np);
+		put_device(&mux_chip->dev);
 		return ERR_PTR(-EINVAL);
 	}
 
@@ -476,10 +478,10 @@ struct mux_control *mux_control_get(struct device *dev, const char *mux_name)
 	if (controller >= mux_chip->controllers) {
 		dev_err(dev, "%pOF: bad mux controller %u specified in %pOF\n",
 			np, controller, args.np);
+		put_device(&mux_chip->dev);
 		return ERR_PTR(-EINVAL);
 	}
 
-	get_device(&mux_chip->dev);
 	return &mux_chip->mux[controller];
 }
 EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(mux_control_get);
-- 
2.11.0

             reply	other threads:[~2018-01-08 18:20 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2018-01-08 18:19 Peter Rosin [this message]
2018-01-09 10:28 ` [RESEND PATCH] mux: core: fix double get_device() Greg Kroah-Hartman

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20180108181952.29194-1-peda@axentia.se \
    --to=peda@axentia.se \
    --cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=hdegoede@redhat.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).