From: Prarit Bhargava <prarit@redhat.com>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Prarit Bhargava <prarit@redhat.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>, "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
x86@kernel.org, Boris Ostrovsky <boris.ostrovsky@oracle.com>,
Juergen Gross <jgross@suse.com>,
Dou Liyang <douly.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com>,
Kate Stewart <kstewart@linuxfoundation.org>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org>,
Andi Kleen <ak@linux.intel.com>,
Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@redhat.com>,
xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org
Subject: [PATCH] x86/xen: Calculate __max_logical_packages on PV domains
Date: Wed, 7 Feb 2018 18:49:23 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20180207234923.13544-1-prarit@redhat.com> (raw)
The kernel panics on PV domains because native_smp_cpus_done() is
only called for HVM domains.
Calculate __max_logical_packages for PV domains.
Fixes: b4c0a7326f5d ("x86/smpboot: Fix __max_logical_packages estimate")
Signed-off-by: Prarit Bhargava <prarit@redhat.com>
Tested-and-reported-by: Simon Gaiser <simon@invisiblethingslab.com>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>
Cc: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>
Cc: x86@kernel.org
Cc: Boris Ostrovsky <boris.ostrovsky@oracle.com>
Cc: Juergen Gross <jgross@suse.com>
Cc: Dou Liyang <douly.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com>
Cc: Prarit Bhargava <prarit@redhat.com>
Cc: Kate Stewart <kstewart@linuxfoundation.org>
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Cc: Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org>
Cc: Andi Kleen <ak@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@redhat.com>
Cc: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org
---
arch/x86/include/asm/smp.h | 1 +
arch/x86/kernel/smpboot.c | 10 ++++++++--
arch/x86/xen/smp.c | 2 ++
3 files changed, 11 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/smp.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/smp.h
index 461f53d27708..a4189762b266 100644
--- a/arch/x86/include/asm/smp.h
+++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/smp.h
@@ -129,6 +129,7 @@ static inline void arch_send_call_function_ipi_mask(const struct cpumask *mask)
void cpu_disable_common(void);
void native_smp_prepare_boot_cpu(void);
void native_smp_prepare_cpus(unsigned int max_cpus);
+void calculate_max_logical_packages(void);
void native_smp_cpus_done(unsigned int max_cpus);
void common_cpu_up(unsigned int cpunum, struct task_struct *tidle);
int native_cpu_up(unsigned int cpunum, struct task_struct *tidle);
diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/smpboot.c b/arch/x86/kernel/smpboot.c
index 6f27facbaa9b..767573b7f2db 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/smpboot.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/smpboot.c
@@ -1281,11 +1281,10 @@ void __init native_smp_prepare_boot_cpu(void)
cpu_set_state_online(me);
}
-void __init native_smp_cpus_done(unsigned int max_cpus)
+void __init calculate_max_logical_packages(void)
{
int ncpus;
- pr_debug("Boot done\n");
/*
* Today neither Intel nor AMD support heterogenous systems so
* extrapolate the boot cpu's data to all packages.
@@ -1293,6 +1292,13 @@ void __init native_smp_cpus_done(unsigned int max_cpus)
ncpus = cpu_data(0).booted_cores * topology_max_smt_threads();
__max_logical_packages = DIV_ROUND_UP(nr_cpu_ids, ncpus);
pr_info("Max logical packages: %u\n", __max_logical_packages);
+}
+
+void __init native_smp_cpus_done(unsigned int max_cpus)
+{
+ pr_debug("Boot done\n");
+
+ calculate_max_logical_packages();
if (x86_has_numa_in_package)
set_sched_topology(x86_numa_in_package_topology);
diff --git a/arch/x86/xen/smp.c b/arch/x86/xen/smp.c
index 77c959cf81e7..7a43b2ae19f1 100644
--- a/arch/x86/xen/smp.c
+++ b/arch/x86/xen/smp.c
@@ -122,6 +122,8 @@ void __init xen_smp_cpus_done(unsigned int max_cpus)
if (xen_hvm_domain())
native_smp_cpus_done(max_cpus);
+ else
+ calculate_max_logical_packages();
if (xen_have_vcpu_info_placement)
return;
--
2.15.0.rc0.39.g2f0e14e64
next reply other threads:[~2018-02-07 23:49 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-02-07 23:49 Prarit Bhargava [this message]
2018-02-08 0:59 ` [PATCH] x86/xen: Calculate __max_logical_packages on PV domains Boris Ostrovsky
2018-02-08 8:49 ` Juergen Gross
2018-02-13 12:29 ` Ingo Molnar
2018-02-27 17:08 ` Simon Gaiser
2018-02-12 13:51 ` Juergen Gross
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20180207234923.13544-1-prarit@redhat.com \
--to=prarit@redhat.com \
--cc=ak@linux.intel.com \
--cc=boris.ostrovsky@oracle.com \
--cc=douly.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=jgross@suse.com \
--cc=kstewart@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=luto@kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=vkuznets@redhat.com \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
--cc=xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).