linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>
To: linux-doc@vger.kernel.org
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, mchehab@kernel.org, me@tobin.cc,
	Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>
Subject: [PATCH 8/8] docs: kernel-doc: Don't mangle literal code blocks in comments
Date: Wed,  7 Feb 2018 10:26:24 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20180207172624.24555-9-corbet@lwn.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20180207172624.24555-1-corbet@lwn.net>

It can be useful to put code snippets into kerneldoc comments; that can be
done with the "::" operator at the end of a line like this::

   if (desperate)
       run_in_circles();

kernel-doc currently fails to understand these literal blocks and applies
its normal markup to them, which is then treated as literal by sphinx.  The
result is unsightly markup instead of a useful code snippet.

Apply a hack to the output code to recognize literal blocks and avoid
performing any special markup on them.  It's ugly, but that means it fits
in well with the rest of the script.

Signed-off-by: Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>
---
 scripts/kernel-doc | 55 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----
 1 file changed, 50 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)

diff --git a/scripts/kernel-doc b/scripts/kernel-doc
index c6c9370a1e49..c984f82cb897 100755
--- a/scripts/kernel-doc
+++ b/scripts/kernel-doc
@@ -748,14 +748,59 @@ sub output_blockhead_rst(%) {
     }
 }
 
-sub output_highlight_rst {
-    my $contents = join "\n",@_;
-    my $line;
-
+#
+# Apply the RST highlights to a sub-block of text.
+#   
+sub highlight_block($) {
+    # The dohighlight kludge requires the text be called $contents
+    my $contents = shift;
     eval $dohighlight;
     die $@ if $@;
+    return $contents;
+}
 
-    foreach $line (split "\n", $contents) {
+sub output_highlight_rst {
+    my $input = join "\n",@_;
+    my $output = "";
+    my $line;
+    my $in_literal = 0;
+    my $litprefix;
+    my $block = "";
+
+    # The "dohighlight" hack requires that the data be called "$contents"
+    foreach $line (split "\n",$input) {
+	#
+	# If we're in a literal block, see if we should drop out
+	# of it.  Otherwise pass the line straight through unmunged.
+	#
+	if ($in_literal) {
+	    if (! ($line =~ /$litprefix/ || $line =~ /^\s*$/)) {
+		$in_literal = 0;
+	    }
+	    else {
+		$output .= $line . "\n";
+	    }
+	}
+	#
+	# Not in a literal block (or just dropped out)
+	#
+	if (! $in_literal) {
+	    $block .= $line . "\n";
+	    if ($line =~ /^[^.].*::$/) {
+		$in_literal = 1;
+		# Note current indentation - we'll go as long as it's deeper.
+		$line =~ /^(\s*)/;
+		$litprefix = '^' . $1 . ' ';
+		$output .= highlight_block($block);
+		$block = ""
+	    }
+	}
+    }
+
+    if ($block) {
+	$output .= highlight_block($block);
+    }
+    foreach $line (split "\n", $output) {
 	print $lineprefix . $line . "\n";
     }
 }
-- 
2.14.3

  parent reply	other threads:[~2018-02-07 17:27 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 27+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2018-02-07 17:26 [PATCH 0/8] Clean up kernel-doc and fix literal-block handling Jonathan Corbet
2018-02-07 17:26 ` [PATCH 1/8] docs: kernel-doc: Get rid of xml_escape() and friends Jonathan Corbet
2018-02-09  9:09   ` Jani Nikula
2018-02-09 13:32     ` Jonathan Corbet
2018-02-07 17:26 ` [PATCH 2/8] docs: kernel-doc: Rename and split STATE_FIELD Jonathan Corbet
2018-02-09  9:20   ` Jani Nikula
2018-02-07 17:26 ` [PATCH 3/8] docs: kernel-doc: Move STATE_NORMAL processing into its own function Jonathan Corbet
2018-02-09  9:23   ` Jani Nikula
2018-02-07 17:26 ` [PATCH 4/8] docs: kernel-doc: Move STATE_NAME " Jonathan Corbet
2018-02-09  9:27   ` Jani Nikula
2018-02-07 17:26 ` [PATCH 5/8] docs: kernel-doc: Move STATE_BODY processing to a separate function Jonathan Corbet
2018-02-09  9:32   ` Jani Nikula
2018-02-09 17:30     ` Linus Torvalds
2018-02-13 10:01       ` Jani Nikula
2018-02-07 17:26 ` [PATCH 6/8] docs: kernel-doc: Move STATE_PROTO processing into its own function Jonathan Corbet
2018-02-09  9:33   ` Jani Nikula
2018-02-07 17:26 ` [PATCH 7/8] docs: kernel-doc: Finish moving STATE_* code out of process_file() Jonathan Corbet
2018-02-08  2:29   ` Tobin C. Harding
2018-02-08 19:58     ` Jonathan Corbet
2018-02-09  9:36       ` Jani Nikula
2018-02-07 17:26 ` Jonathan Corbet [this message]
2018-02-08  2:30   ` [PATCH 8/8] docs: kernel-doc: Don't mangle literal code blocks in comments Tobin C. Harding
2018-02-09  9:47   ` Jani Nikula
2018-02-14 16:53   ` Markus Heiser
2018-02-08  2:26 ` [PATCH 0/8] Clean up kernel-doc and fix literal-block handling Tobin C. Harding
2018-02-14 18:40 [PATCH v2 0/8] docs: Cleanup kernel-doc and fix literal block handling Jonathan Corbet
2018-02-14 18:40 ` [PATCH 8/8] docs: kernel-doc: Don't mangle literal code blocks in comments Jonathan Corbet
2018-02-14 19:10   ` Jani Nikula

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20180207172624.24555-9-corbet@lwn.net \
    --to=corbet@lwn.net \
    --cc=linux-doc@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mchehab@kernel.org \
    --cc=me@tobin.cc \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).