linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Fenghua Yu <fenghua.yu@intel.com>
To: "Thomas Gleixner" <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	"Ingo Molnar" <mingo@elte.hu>,
	"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@linux.intel.com>,
	"Ashok Raj" <ashok.raj@intel.com>,
	"Ravi V Shankar" <ravi.v.shankar@intel.com>,
	"Tony Luck" <tony.luck@intel.com>,
	"Dave Hansen" <dave.hansen@intel.com>,
	"Rafael Wysocki" <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>,
	"Arjan van de Ven" <arjan@infradead.org>,
	"Alan Cox" <alan@linux.intel.com>
Cc: "x86" <x86@kernel.org>,
	"linux-kernel" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Fenghua Yu <fenghua.yu@intel.com>
Subject: [PATCH 05/15] x86/split_lock: Use non atomic set and clear bit instructions to clear cpufeature
Date: Mon, 14 May 2018 11:52:15 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1526323945-211107-6-git-send-email-fenghua.yu@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1526323945-211107-1-git-send-email-fenghua.yu@intel.com>

When #AC exception is enabled for split locked accesses,
clear_cpufeature() generates #AC exception because of atomic setting
or clearing bits in non cache line aligned x86_capability depending
on compiler.

But kernel clears cpufeatures only when a CPU boots up. Therefore, there
is no racing condition when clear_cpufeature() is called and no need to
atomically clear or set x86_capability.

To avoid #AC exception caused by split lock and get better performance,
call non atomic __set_bit() and __clear_bit().

Signed-off-by: Fenghua Yu <fenghua.yu@intel.com>
---
 arch/x86/kernel/cpu/cpuid-deps.c | 10 +++++-----
 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/cpuid-deps.c b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/cpuid-deps.c
index 2c0bd38a44ab..0c02c6e44ea7 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/cpuid-deps.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/cpuid-deps.c
@@ -65,15 +65,15 @@ static const struct cpuid_dep cpuid_deps[] = {
 static inline void clear_feature(struct cpuinfo_x86 *c, unsigned int feature)
 {
 	/*
-	 * Note: This could use the non atomic __*_bit() variants, but the
-	 * rest of the cpufeature code uses atomics as well, so keep it for
-	 * consistency. Cleanup all of it separately.
+	 * Because this code is only called during boot time and there
+	 * is no need to be atomic, use non atomic __*_bit() to avoid
+	 * #AC exception for split locked access.
 	 */
 	if (!c) {
 		clear_cpu_cap(&boot_cpu_data, feature);
-		set_bit(feature, (unsigned long *)cpu_caps_cleared);
+		__set_bit(feature, (unsigned long *)cpu_caps_cleared);
 	} else {
-		clear_bit(feature, (unsigned long *)c->x86_capability);
+		__clear_bit(feature, (unsigned long *)c->x86_capability);
 	}
 }
 
-- 
2.5.0

  parent reply	other threads:[~2018-05-14 18:54 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 31+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2018-05-14 18:52 [PATCH 0/15] x86/split_lock: Enable #AC exception for split locked accesses Fenghua Yu
2018-05-14 18:52 ` [PATCH 01/15] x86/split_lock: Add CONFIG and enumerate #AC exception for split locked access feature Fenghua Yu
2018-05-15 15:36   ` Dave Hansen
2018-05-15 15:41     ` Fenghua Yu
2018-05-15 15:54       ` Dave Hansen
2018-05-14 18:52 ` [PATCH 02/15] x86/split_lock: Set up #AC exception for split locked accesses Fenghua Yu
2018-05-14 18:52 ` [PATCH 03/15] x86/split_lock: Handle #AC exception for split lock in kernel mode Fenghua Yu
2018-05-15 15:51   ` Dave Hansen
2018-05-15 16:35     ` Luck, Tony
2018-05-15 17:21     ` Fenghua Yu
2018-05-16 16:44       ` Dave Hansen
2018-05-16 21:35         ` Fenghua Yu
2018-05-14 18:52 ` [PATCH 04/15] x86/split_lock: Use non locked bit set instruction in set_cpu_cap Fenghua Yu
2018-05-14 18:52 ` Fenghua Yu [this message]
2018-05-14 18:52 ` [PATCH 06/15] x86/split_lock: Save #AC setting for split lock in BIOS in boot time and restore the setting in reboot Fenghua Yu
2018-05-14 18:52 ` [PATCH 07/15] x86/split_lock: Handle suspend/hibernate and resume Fenghua Yu
2018-05-14 21:42   ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2018-05-14 18:52 ` [PATCH 08/15] x86/split_lock: Set split lock during EFI runtime service Fenghua Yu
2018-05-14 18:52 ` [PATCH 09/15] x86/split_lock: Explicitly enable or disable #AC for split locked accesses Fenghua Yu
2018-05-15 16:15   ` Dave Hansen
2018-05-15 17:29     ` Fenghua Yu
2018-05-16 16:37       ` Dave Hansen
2018-05-14 18:52 ` [PATCH 10/15] x86/split_lock: Add a sysfs interface to allow user to enable or disable split lock during run time Fenghua Yu
2018-05-14 18:52 ` [PATCH 11/15] x86/split_lock: Add sysfs interface to control user mode behavior Fenghua Yu
2018-05-14 18:52 ` [PATCH 12/15] x86/split_lock: Add sysfs interface to show and control BIOS split lock setting Fenghua Yu
2018-05-14 18:52 ` [PATCH 13/15] x86/split_lock: Trace #AC exception for split lock Fenghua Yu
2018-05-14 18:52 ` [PATCH 14/15] x86/split_lock: Add CONFIG and testing sysfs interface Fenghua Yu
2018-05-14 18:52 ` [PATCH 15/15] x86/split_lock: Add split lock user space test in selftest Fenghua Yu
2018-05-15 15:10 ` [PATCH 0/15] x86/split_lock: Enable #AC exception for split locked accesses Dave Hansen
2018-05-15 16:26   ` Alan Cox
2018-05-15 16:30     ` Dave Hansen

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1526323945-211107-6-git-send-email-fenghua.yu@intel.com \
    --to=fenghua.yu@intel.com \
    --cc=alan@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=arjan@infradead.org \
    --cc=ashok.raj@intel.com \
    --cc=dave.hansen@intel.com \
    --cc=hpa@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@elte.hu \
    --cc=rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com \
    --cc=ravi.v.shankar@intel.com \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=tony.luck@intel.com \
    --cc=x86@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).