linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Fenghua Yu <fenghua.yu@intel.com>
To: "Thomas Gleixner" <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	"Ingo Molnar" <mingo@elte.hu>,
	"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@linux.intel.com>,
	"Ashok Raj" <ashok.raj@intel.com>,
	"Ravi V Shankar" <ravi.v.shankar@intel.com>,
	"Tony Luck" <tony.luck@intel.com>,
	"Dave Hansen" <dave.hansen@intel.com>,
	"Rafael Wysocki" <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>,
	"Arjan van de Ven" <arjan@infradead.org>,
	"Alan Cox" <alan@linux.intel.com>
Cc: "x86" <x86@kernel.org>,
	"linux-kernel" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Fenghua Yu <fenghua.yu@intel.com>
Subject: [PATCH 03/15] x86/split_lock: Handle #AC exception for split lock in kernel mode
Date: Mon, 14 May 2018 11:52:13 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1526323945-211107-4-git-send-email-fenghua.yu@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1526323945-211107-1-git-send-email-fenghua.yu@intel.com>

When #AC exception for split lock happens in kernel code, disable
further #AC exception for split lock in the handler. Then the
faulting instruction is re-executed after exiting from the handler
without triggering another #AC exception. Re-enable #AC exception
for split lock later (after 1 ms).

During the period between disabling and re-enabling #AC exception for
split lock, some split locked accesses may not be captured. And since
the MSR_TEST_CTL is per core, disabling #AC exception for split
lock on one thread disables the feature on all threads in the
same core.

Although it's not an accurate way, the delayed re-enabling code is
simpler and cleaner than another possible method which sets single
step execution in the #AC exception and re-enables #AC for split lock
in debug trap triggered by the next instruction after the faulting
instruction. The delayed re-enabling code can prevent split lock #AC
flood caused by a lot split locks in short time (e.g. faulting
instruction in a loop). And there is no missing split lock because
the following few blocked split locks will show up once the first split
lock issue is fixed

Signed-off-by: Fenghua Yu <fenghua.yu@intel.com>
---
 arch/x86/include/asm/cpu.h       |  3 ++
 arch/x86/kernel/cpu/split_lock.c | 67 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
 arch/x86/kernel/traps.c          | 12 +++++++
 3 files changed, 81 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/cpu.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/cpu.h
index b4fe6496bb15..80dc27d73e81 100644
--- a/arch/x86/include/asm/cpu.h
+++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/cpu.h
@@ -43,8 +43,11 @@ unsigned int x86_stepping(unsigned int sig);
 #ifdef CONFIG_SPLIT_LOCK_AC
 int __init enumerate_split_lock(void);
 void setup_split_lock(void);
+bool do_split_lock_exception(struct pt_regs *regs, unsigned long error_code);
 #else /* CONFIG_SPLIT_LOCK_AC */
 static inline int enumerate_split_lock(void) { return 0; }
 static inline void setup_split_lock(void) {}
+static inline bool
+do_split_lock_exception(struct pt_regs *regs, unsigned long error_code) {}
 #endif /* CONFIG_SPLIT_LOCK_AC */
 #endif /* _ASM_X86_CPU_H */
diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/split_lock.c b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/split_lock.c
index 98bbfb176cf4..efe6f39353d1 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/split_lock.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/split_lock.c
@@ -11,6 +11,8 @@
 #define pr_fmt(fmt)	KBUILD_MODNAME ": " fmt
 
 #include <linux/printk.h>
+#include <linux/workqueue.h>
+#include <linux/cpu.h>
 #include <asm/msr.h>
 
 static bool split_lock_ac_supported;
@@ -20,6 +22,11 @@ static bool split_lock_ac_supported;
 
 static int split_lock_ac = DISABLE_SPLIT_LOCK_AC;
 
+static DEFINE_SPINLOCK(sl_lock);
+
+static void delayed_reenable_split_lock(struct work_struct *w);
+static DECLARE_DELAYED_WORK(delayed_work, delayed_reenable_split_lock);
+
 /*
  * On processors not supporting #AC exception for split lock feature,
  * MSR_TEST_CTL may not exist or MSR_TEST_CTL exists but the bit 29 is
@@ -76,6 +83,13 @@ static bool _setup_split_lock(int split_lock_ac_val)
 {
 	u32 l, h;
 
+	/*
+	 * The MSR_TEST_CTL is per core.
+	 *
+	 * We use spin lock to solve race condition when multiple threads
+	 * on the same core generate #AC exception at the same time.
+	 */
+	spin_lock(&sl_lock);
 	rdmsr(MSR_TEST_CTL, l, h);
 
 	/* No need to update MSR if same value. */
@@ -90,11 +104,17 @@ static bool _setup_split_lock(int split_lock_ac_val)
 		/* Clear the split lock bit to disable the feature. */
 		l &= ~MSR_TEST_CTL_ENABLE_AC_SPLIT_LOCK;
 	else
-		return false;
+		goto out_fail;
 
 	wrmsr(MSR_TEST_CTL, l, h);
 out:
+	spin_unlock(&sl_lock);
+
 	return true;
+out_fail:
+	spin_unlock(&sl_lock);
+
+	return false;
 }
 
 void setup_split_lock(void)
@@ -114,3 +134,48 @@ void setup_split_lock(void)
 out_fail:
 	pr_warn("fail to set split lock #AC\n");
 }
+
+#define	delay_ms	1
+
+static void delayed_reenable_split_lock(struct work_struct *w)
+{
+	if (split_lock_ac == ENABLE_SPLIT_LOCK_AC)
+		_setup_split_lock(ENABLE_SPLIT_LOCK_AC);
+}
+
+/* Will the faulting instruction be re-executed? */
+static bool re_execute(struct pt_regs *regs)
+{
+	/*
+	 * The only reason for generating #AC from kernel is because of
+	 * split lock. The kernel faulting instruction will be re-executed.
+	 */
+	if (!user_mode(regs))
+		return true;
+
+	return false;
+}
+
+/*
+ * #AC handler for kernel split lock is called by generic #AC handler.
+ *
+ * Disable #AC for split lock on this CPU so that the faulting instruction
+ * gets executed. The #AC for split lock is re-enabled later.
+ */
+bool do_split_lock_exception(struct pt_regs *regs, unsigned long error_code)
+{
+	unsigned long delay = msecs_to_jiffies(delay_ms);
+	unsigned long address = read_cr2(); /* Get the faulting address */
+	int this_cpu = smp_processor_id();
+
+	if (!re_execute(regs))
+		return false;
+
+	pr_info_ratelimited("Alignment check for split lock at %lx\n", address);
+
+	_setup_split_lock(DISABLE_SPLIT_LOCK_AC);
+
+	schedule_delayed_work_on(this_cpu, &delayed_work, delay);
+
+	return true;
+}
diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/traps.c b/arch/x86/kernel/traps.c
index 03f3d7695dac..c07b817bbbe9 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/traps.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/traps.c
@@ -61,6 +61,7 @@
 #include <asm/mpx.h>
 #include <asm/vm86.h>
 #include <asm/umip.h>
+#include <asm/cpu.h>
 
 #ifdef CONFIG_X86_64
 #include <asm/x86_init.h>
@@ -286,10 +287,21 @@ static void do_error_trap(struct pt_regs *regs, long error_code, char *str,
 			  unsigned long trapnr, int signr)
 {
 	siginfo_t info;
+	int ret;
 
 	RCU_LOCKDEP_WARN(!rcu_is_watching(), "entry code didn't wake RCU");
 
 	/*
+	 * #AC exception could be handled by split lock handler.
+	 * If the handler can't handle the exception, go to generic #AC handler.
+	 */
+	if (trapnr == X86_TRAP_AC) {
+		ret = do_split_lock_exception(regs, error_code);
+		if (ret)
+			return;
+	}
+
+	/*
 	 * WARN*()s end up here; fix them up before we call the
 	 * notifier chain.
 	 */
-- 
2.5.0

  parent reply	other threads:[~2018-05-14 18:55 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 31+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2018-05-14 18:52 [PATCH 0/15] x86/split_lock: Enable #AC exception for split locked accesses Fenghua Yu
2018-05-14 18:52 ` [PATCH 01/15] x86/split_lock: Add CONFIG and enumerate #AC exception for split locked access feature Fenghua Yu
2018-05-15 15:36   ` Dave Hansen
2018-05-15 15:41     ` Fenghua Yu
2018-05-15 15:54       ` Dave Hansen
2018-05-14 18:52 ` [PATCH 02/15] x86/split_lock: Set up #AC exception for split locked accesses Fenghua Yu
2018-05-14 18:52 ` Fenghua Yu [this message]
2018-05-15 15:51   ` [PATCH 03/15] x86/split_lock: Handle #AC exception for split lock in kernel mode Dave Hansen
2018-05-15 16:35     ` Luck, Tony
2018-05-15 17:21     ` Fenghua Yu
2018-05-16 16:44       ` Dave Hansen
2018-05-16 21:35         ` Fenghua Yu
2018-05-14 18:52 ` [PATCH 04/15] x86/split_lock: Use non locked bit set instruction in set_cpu_cap Fenghua Yu
2018-05-14 18:52 ` [PATCH 05/15] x86/split_lock: Use non atomic set and clear bit instructions to clear cpufeature Fenghua Yu
2018-05-14 18:52 ` [PATCH 06/15] x86/split_lock: Save #AC setting for split lock in BIOS in boot time and restore the setting in reboot Fenghua Yu
2018-05-14 18:52 ` [PATCH 07/15] x86/split_lock: Handle suspend/hibernate and resume Fenghua Yu
2018-05-14 21:42   ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2018-05-14 18:52 ` [PATCH 08/15] x86/split_lock: Set split lock during EFI runtime service Fenghua Yu
2018-05-14 18:52 ` [PATCH 09/15] x86/split_lock: Explicitly enable or disable #AC for split locked accesses Fenghua Yu
2018-05-15 16:15   ` Dave Hansen
2018-05-15 17:29     ` Fenghua Yu
2018-05-16 16:37       ` Dave Hansen
2018-05-14 18:52 ` [PATCH 10/15] x86/split_lock: Add a sysfs interface to allow user to enable or disable split lock during run time Fenghua Yu
2018-05-14 18:52 ` [PATCH 11/15] x86/split_lock: Add sysfs interface to control user mode behavior Fenghua Yu
2018-05-14 18:52 ` [PATCH 12/15] x86/split_lock: Add sysfs interface to show and control BIOS split lock setting Fenghua Yu
2018-05-14 18:52 ` [PATCH 13/15] x86/split_lock: Trace #AC exception for split lock Fenghua Yu
2018-05-14 18:52 ` [PATCH 14/15] x86/split_lock: Add CONFIG and testing sysfs interface Fenghua Yu
2018-05-14 18:52 ` [PATCH 15/15] x86/split_lock: Add split lock user space test in selftest Fenghua Yu
2018-05-15 15:10 ` [PATCH 0/15] x86/split_lock: Enable #AC exception for split locked accesses Dave Hansen
2018-05-15 16:26   ` Alan Cox
2018-05-15 16:30     ` Dave Hansen

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1526323945-211107-4-git-send-email-fenghua.yu@intel.com \
    --to=fenghua.yu@intel.com \
    --cc=alan@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=arjan@infradead.org \
    --cc=ashok.raj@intel.com \
    --cc=dave.hansen@intel.com \
    --cc=hpa@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@elte.hu \
    --cc=rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com \
    --cc=ravi.v.shankar@intel.com \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=tony.luck@intel.com \
    --cc=x86@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).