From: Vivek Gautam <vivek.gautam@codeaurora.org>
To: joro@8bytes.org, robh+dt@kernel.org, rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com,
robin.murphy@arm.com, iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org,
devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: mark.rutland@arm.com, will.deacon@arm.com, robdclark@gmail.com,
tfiga@chromium.org, sricharan@codeaurora.org,
m.szyprowski@samsung.com, architt@codeaurora.org,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org, vivek.gautam@codeaurora.org,
"Rafael J . Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Subject: [PATCH v10 1/5] driver core: Delete the link between two given devices
Date: Wed, 14 Mar 2018 13:44:30 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20180314081434.30875-2-vivek.gautam@codeaurora.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20180314081434.30875-1-vivek.gautam@codeaurora.org>
Given the consumer and supplier devices, add an API to
delete the link between them.
Suggested-by: Tomasz Figa <tfiga@chromium.org>
Signed-off-by: Vivek Gautam <vivek.gautam@codeaurora.org>
Cc: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@rjwysocki.net>
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
---
- This patch replaces an earlier patch [1] that was adding
device_link_find() API.
[1] https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/10277975/
drivers/base/core.c | 31 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
include/linux/device.h | 1 +
2 files changed, 32 insertions(+)
diff --git a/drivers/base/core.c b/drivers/base/core.c
index 5847364f25d9..e13d904e1e12 100644
--- a/drivers/base/core.c
+++ b/drivers/base/core.c
@@ -336,6 +336,37 @@ void device_link_del(struct device_link *link)
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(device_link_del);
+/**
+ * device_link_del_dev - Delete a link between two given devices
+ * @consumer: Consumer end of the link.
+ * @supplier: Supplier end of the link.
+ *
+ * The caller must ensure proper synchronization of this function with runtime
+ * PM.
+ */
+void device_link_del_dev(struct device *consumer, struct device *supplier)
+{
+ struct device_link *link;
+
+ if (!consumer || !supplier)
+ return;
+
+ device_links_write_lock();
+ device_pm_lock();
+
+ list_for_each_entry(link, &supplier->links.consumers, s_node) {
+ if (link->consumer == consumer) {
+ __device_link_del(link);
+ /* just one link between the devices */
+ break;
+ }
+ }
+
+ device_pm_unlock();
+ device_links_write_unlock();
+}
+EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(device_link_del_dev);
+
static void device_links_missing_supplier(struct device *dev)
{
struct device_link *link;
diff --git a/include/linux/device.h b/include/linux/device.h
index b093405ed525..14508d843f67 100644
--- a/include/linux/device.h
+++ b/include/linux/device.h
@@ -1278,6 +1278,7 @@ extern const char *dev_driver_string(const struct device *dev);
struct device_link *device_link_add(struct device *consumer,
struct device *supplier, u32 flags);
void device_link_del(struct device_link *link);
+void device_link_del_dev(struct device *consumer, struct device *supplier);
#ifdef CONFIG_PRINTK
--
QUALCOMM INDIA, on behalf of Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member
of Code Aurora Forum, hosted by The Linux Foundation
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-03-14 8:14 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-03-14 8:14 [PATCH v10 0/5] iommu/arm-smmu: Add runtime pm/sleep support Vivek Gautam
2018-03-14 8:14 ` Vivek Gautam [this message]
2018-03-14 8:14 ` [PATCH v10 2/5] iommu/arm-smmu: Add pm_runtime/sleep ops Vivek Gautam
2018-03-14 8:14 ` [PATCH v10 3/5] iommu/arm-smmu: Invoke pm_runtime during probe, add/remove device Vivek Gautam
2018-03-14 8:14 ` [PATCH v10 4/5] iommu/arm-smmu: Add the device_link between masters and smmu Vivek Gautam
2018-03-16 6:41 ` Tomasz Figa
2018-03-14 8:14 ` [PATCH v10 5/5] iommu/arm-smmu: Add support for qcom,smmu-v2 variant Vivek Gautam
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20180314081434.30875-2-vivek.gautam@codeaurora.org \
--to=vivek.gautam@codeaurora.org \
--cc=architt@codeaurora.org \
--cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org \
--cc=joro@8bytes.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=m.szyprowski@samsung.com \
--cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
--cc=rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com \
--cc=rjw@rjwysocki.net \
--cc=robdclark@gmail.com \
--cc=robh+dt@kernel.org \
--cc=robin.murphy@arm.com \
--cc=sricharan@codeaurora.org \
--cc=tfiga@chromium.org \
--cc=will.deacon@arm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).