From: Gregory Haskins <ghaskins@novell.com>
To: mingo@elte.hu, tglx@linutronix.de, rostedt@goodmis.org
Cc: linux-rt-users@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
ghaskins@novell.com
Subject: [PATCH] RT: Add a per-cpu rt_overload indication
Date: Fri, 05 Oct 2007 10:23:49 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20071005142230.23643.28807.stgit@ghaskins-t60p.haskins.net> (raw)
The -rt scheduler currently evaluates all online CPUs whenever one or more
enters an rt_overload condition. This suffers from scalability limitations
as the # of online CPUs increases since each rq->lock needs to be acquired by
each cpu. So we introduce a cpumask to track exactly which CPUs need RT
balancing.
Signed-off-by: Gregory Haskins <ghaskins@novell.com>
---
kernel/sched.c | 12 +++++++++---
1 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/kernel/sched.c b/kernel/sched.c
index 93fd6de..aaacec2 100644
--- a/kernel/sched.c
+++ b/kernel/sched.c
@@ -631,6 +631,7 @@ static inline struct rq *this_rq_lock(void)
#if defined(CONFIG_PREEMPT_RT) && defined(CONFIG_SMP)
static __cacheline_aligned_in_smp atomic_t rt_overload;
+static cpumask_t rto_cpus;
#endif
static inline void inc_rt_tasks(struct task_struct *p, struct rq *rq)
@@ -639,8 +640,11 @@ static inline void inc_rt_tasks(struct task_struct *p, struct rq *rq)
if (rt_task(p)) {
rq->rt_nr_running++;
# ifdef CONFIG_SMP
- if (rq->rt_nr_running == 2)
+ if (rq->rt_nr_running == 2) {
+ cpu_set(rq->cpu, rto_cpus);
+ smp_wmb();
atomic_inc(&rt_overload);
+ }
# endif
}
#endif
@@ -653,8 +657,10 @@ static inline void dec_rt_tasks(struct task_struct *p, struct rq *rq)
WARN_ON(!rq->rt_nr_running);
rq->rt_nr_running--;
# ifdef CONFIG_SMP
- if (rq->rt_nr_running == 1)
+ if (rq->rt_nr_running == 1) {
atomic_dec(&rt_overload);
+ cpu_clear(rq->cpu, rto_cpus);
+ }
# endif
}
#endif
@@ -1503,7 +1509,7 @@ static void balance_rt_tasks(struct rq *this_rq, int this_cpu)
*/
next = pick_next_task(this_rq, this_rq->curr);
- for_each_online_cpu(cpu) {
+ for_each_cpu_mask(cpu, rto_cpus) {
if (cpu == this_cpu)
continue;
src_rq = cpu_rq(cpu);
reply other threads:[~2007-10-05 14:26 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: [no followups] expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20071005142230.23643.28807.stgit@ghaskins-t60p.haskins.net \
--to=ghaskins@novell.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-rt-users@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).