From: Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@arm.com>
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Cc: mark.rutland@arm.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
will.deacon@arm.com, robin.murphy@arm.com,
julien.thierry@arm.com, Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@arm.com>
Subject: [PATCH v3 5/7] arm64: perf: Clean up armv8pmu_select_counter
Date: Tue, 19 Jun 2018 11:15:40 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1529403342-17899-6-git-send-email-suzuki.poulose@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1529403342-17899-1-git-send-email-suzuki.poulose@arm.com>
armv8pmu_select_counter always returns the passed idx. So
let us make that void and get rid of the pointless checks.
Suggested-by: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
Cc: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@arm.com>
---
arch/arm64/kernel/perf_event.c | 29 +++++++++++++++++++----------
1 file changed, 19 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/perf_event.c b/arch/arm64/kernel/perf_event.c
index 66a2ffd..9ce3729 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/kernel/perf_event.c
+++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/perf_event.c
@@ -503,13 +503,17 @@ static inline int armv8pmu_counter_has_overflowed(u32 pmnc, int idx)
return pmnc & BIT(ARMV8_IDX_TO_COUNTER(idx));
}
-static inline int armv8pmu_select_counter(int idx)
+static inline void armv8pmu_select_counter(int idx)
{
u32 counter = ARMV8_IDX_TO_COUNTER(idx);
write_sysreg(counter, pmselr_el0);
isb();
+}
- return idx;
+static inline u32 armv8pmu_read_evcntr(int idx)
+{
+ armv8pmu_select_counter(idx);
+ return read_sysreg(pmxevcntr_el0);
}
static inline u64 armv8pmu_read_counter(struct perf_event *event)
@@ -524,12 +528,18 @@ static inline u64 armv8pmu_read_counter(struct perf_event *event)
smp_processor_id(), idx);
else if (idx == ARMV8_IDX_CYCLE_COUNTER)
value = read_sysreg(pmccntr_el0);
- else if (armv8pmu_select_counter(idx) == idx)
- value = read_sysreg(pmxevcntr_el0);
+ else
+ value = armv8pmu_read_evcntr(idx);
return value;
}
+static inline void armv8pmu_write_evcntr(int idx, u32 value)
+{
+ armv8pmu_select_counter(idx);
+ write_sysreg(value, pmxevcntr_el0);
+}
+
static inline void armv8pmu_write_counter(struct perf_event *event, u64 value)
{
struct arm_pmu *cpu_pmu = to_arm_pmu(event->pmu);
@@ -547,16 +557,15 @@ static inline void armv8pmu_write_counter(struct perf_event *event, u64 value)
*/
value |= 0xffffffff00000000ULL;
write_sysreg(value, pmccntr_el0);
- } else if (armv8pmu_select_counter(idx) == idx)
- write_sysreg(value, pmxevcntr_el0);
+ } else
+ armv8pmu_write_evcntr(idx, value);
}
static inline void armv8pmu_write_evtype(int idx, u32 val)
{
- if (armv8pmu_select_counter(idx) == idx) {
- val &= ARMV8_PMU_EVTYPE_MASK;
- write_sysreg(val, pmxevtyper_el0);
- }
+ armv8pmu_select_counter(idx);
+ val &= ARMV8_PMU_EVTYPE_MASK;
+ write_sysreg(val, pmxevtyper_el0);
}
static inline int armv8pmu_enable_counter(int idx)
--
2.7.4
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-06-19 10:16 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-06-19 10:15 [PATCH v3 0/7] arm64: perf: Support for chained counters Suzuki K Poulose
2018-06-19 10:15 ` [PATCH v3 1/7] arm_pmu: Clean up maximum period handling Suzuki K Poulose
2018-06-19 10:45 ` Mark Rutland
2018-06-19 10:15 ` [PATCH v3 2/7] arm_pmu: Change API to support 64bit counter values Suzuki K Poulose
2018-06-19 10:52 ` Mark Rutland
2018-06-19 10:15 ` [PATCH v3 3/7] arm_pmu: Add support for 64bit event counters Suzuki K Poulose
2018-06-19 10:57 ` Mark Rutland
2018-06-19 10:15 ` [PATCH v3 4/7] arm_pmu: Tidy up clear_event_idx call backs Suzuki K Poulose
2018-06-29 13:27 ` Mark Rutland
2018-06-29 13:40 ` Mark Rutland
2018-06-29 14:18 ` Suzuki K Poulose
2018-06-29 14:29 ` Mark Rutland
2018-06-19 10:15 ` Suzuki K Poulose [this message]
2018-06-29 13:29 ` [PATCH v3 5/7] arm64: perf: Clean up armv8pmu_select_counter Mark Rutland
2018-06-19 10:15 ` [PATCH v3 6/7] arm64: perf: Disable PMU while processing counter overflows Suzuki K Poulose
2018-06-19 10:43 ` Mark Rutland
2018-06-19 10:15 ` [PATCH v3 7/7] arm64: perf: Add support for chaining event counters Suzuki K Poulose
2018-06-29 14:01 ` Mark Rutland
2018-06-29 14:29 ` Suzuki K Poulose
2018-06-29 14:39 ` Mark Rutland
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1529403342-17899-6-git-send-email-suzuki.poulose@arm.com \
--to=suzuki.poulose@arm.com \
--cc=julien.thierry@arm.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
--cc=robin.murphy@arm.com \
--cc=will.deacon@arm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).