linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jason Wang <jasowang@redhat.com>
To: mst@redhat.com, jasowang@redhat.com, netdev@vger.kernel.org
Cc: kvm@vger.kernel.org, virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH net-next 6/9] vhost_net: split out datacopy logic
Date: Fri, 20 Jul 2018 08:15:18 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1532045721-4958-7-git-send-email-jasowang@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1532045721-4958-1-git-send-email-jasowang@redhat.com>

Instead of mixing zerocopy and datacopy logics, this patch tries to
split datacopy logic out. This results for a more compact code and
ad-hoc optimization could be done on top more easily.

Signed-off-by: Jason Wang <jasowang@redhat.com>
---
 drivers/vhost/net.c | 110 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----------
 1 file changed, 90 insertions(+), 20 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/vhost/net.c b/drivers/vhost/net.c
index f59b615..9cef0b2 100644
--- a/drivers/vhost/net.c
+++ b/drivers/vhost/net.c
@@ -520,9 +520,7 @@ static bool tx_can_batch(struct vhost_virtqueue *vq, size_t total_len)
 	       !vhost_vq_avail_empty(vq->dev, vq);
 }
 
-/* Expects to be always run from workqueue - which acts as
- * read-size critical section for our kind of RCU. */
-static void handle_tx(struct vhost_net *net)
+static void handle_tx_copy(struct vhost_net *net, struct socket *sock)
 {
 	struct vhost_net_virtqueue *nvq = &net->vqs[VHOST_NET_VQ_TX];
 	struct vhost_virtqueue *vq = &nvq->vq;
@@ -537,30 +535,76 @@ static void handle_tx(struct vhost_net *net)
 	};
 	size_t len, total_len = 0;
 	int err;
-	struct socket *sock;
-	struct vhost_net_ubuf_ref *uninitialized_var(ubufs);
-	bool zcopy, zcopy_used;
 	int sent_pkts = 0;
 
-	mutex_lock(&vq->mutex);
-	sock = vq->private_data;
-	if (!sock)
-		goto out;
+	for (;;) {
+		bool busyloop_intr = false;
 
-	if (!vq_iotlb_prefetch(vq))
-		goto out;
+		head = get_tx_bufs(net, nvq, &msg, &out, &in, &len,
+				   &busyloop_intr);
+		/* On error, stop handling until the next kick. */
+		if (unlikely(head < 0))
+			break;
+		/* Nothing new?  Wait for eventfd to tell us they refilled. */
+		if (head == vq->num) {
+			if (unlikely(busyloop_intr)) {
+				vhost_poll_queue(&vq->poll);
+			} else if (unlikely(vhost_enable_notify(&net->dev,
+								vq))) {
+				vhost_disable_notify(&net->dev, vq);
+				continue;
+			}
+			break;
+		}
 
-	vhost_disable_notify(&net->dev, vq);
-	vhost_net_disable_vq(net, vq);
+		total_len += len;
+		if (tx_can_batch(vq, total_len))
+			msg.msg_flags |= MSG_MORE;
+		else
+			msg.msg_flags &= ~MSG_MORE;
+
+		/* TODO: Check specific error and bomb out unless ENOBUFS? */
+		err = sock->ops->sendmsg(sock, &msg, len);
+		if (unlikely(err < 0)) {
+			vhost_discard_vq_desc(vq, 1);
+			vhost_net_enable_vq(net, vq);
+			break;
+		}
+		if (err != len)
+			pr_debug("Truncated TX packet: len %d != %zd\n",
+				 err, len);
+		vhost_add_used_and_signal(&net->dev, vq, head, 0);
+		if (vhost_exceeds_weight(++sent_pkts, total_len)) {
+			vhost_poll_queue(&vq->poll);
+			break;
+		}
+	}
+}
 
-	zcopy = nvq->ubufs;
+static void handle_tx_zerocopy(struct vhost_net *net, struct socket *sock)
+{
+	struct vhost_net_virtqueue *nvq = &net->vqs[VHOST_NET_VQ_TX];
+	struct vhost_virtqueue *vq = &nvq->vq;
+	unsigned out, in;
+	int head;
+	struct msghdr msg = {
+		.msg_name = NULL,
+		.msg_namelen = 0,
+		.msg_control = NULL,
+		.msg_controllen = 0,
+		.msg_flags = MSG_DONTWAIT,
+	};
+	size_t len, total_len = 0;
+	int err;
+	struct vhost_net_ubuf_ref *uninitialized_var(ubufs);
+	bool zcopy_used;
+	int sent_pkts = 0;
 
 	for (;;) {
 		bool busyloop_intr;
 
 		/* Release DMAs done buffers first */
-		if (zcopy)
-			vhost_zerocopy_signal_used(net, vq);
+		vhost_zerocopy_signal_used(net, vq);
 
 		busyloop_intr = false;
 		head = get_tx_bufs(net, nvq, &msg, &out, &in, &len,
@@ -579,9 +623,9 @@ static void handle_tx(struct vhost_net *net)
 			break;
 		}
 
-		zcopy_used = zcopy && len >= VHOST_GOODCOPY_LEN
-				   && !vhost_exceeds_maxpend(net)
-				   && vhost_net_tx_select_zcopy(net);
+		zcopy_used = len >= VHOST_GOODCOPY_LEN
+			     && !vhost_exceeds_maxpend(net)
+			     && vhost_net_tx_select_zcopy(net);
 
 		/* use msg_control to pass vhost zerocopy ubuf info to skb */
 		if (zcopy_used) {
@@ -636,6 +680,32 @@ static void handle_tx(struct vhost_net *net)
 			break;
 		}
 	}
+}
+
+/* Expects to be always run from workqueue - which acts as
+ * read-size critical section for our kind of RCU. */
+static void handle_tx(struct vhost_net *net)
+{
+	struct vhost_net_virtqueue *nvq = &net->vqs[VHOST_NET_VQ_TX];
+	struct vhost_virtqueue *vq = &nvq->vq;
+	struct socket *sock;
+
+	mutex_lock(&vq->mutex);
+	sock = vq->private_data;
+	if (!sock)
+		goto out;
+
+	if (!vq_iotlb_prefetch(vq))
+		goto out;
+
+	vhost_disable_notify(&net->dev, vq);
+	vhost_net_disable_vq(net, vq);
+
+	if (vhost_sock_zcopy(sock))
+		handle_tx_zerocopy(net, sock);
+	else
+		handle_tx_copy(net, sock);
+
 out:
 	mutex_unlock(&vq->mutex);
 }
-- 
2.7.4


  parent reply	other threads:[~2018-07-20  0:15 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2018-07-20  0:15 [PATCH net-next 0/9] TX used ring batched updating for vhost Jason Wang
2018-07-20  0:15 ` [PATCH net-next 1/9] vhost_net: drop unnecessary parameter Jason Wang
2018-07-20  0:15 ` [PATCH net-next 2/9] vhost_net: introduce helper to initialize tx iov iter Jason Wang
2018-07-20  0:15 ` [PATCH net-next 3/9] vhost_net: introduce vhost_exceeds_weight() Jason Wang
2018-07-20  0:15 ` [PATCH net-next 4/9] vhost_net: introduce get_tx_bufs() Jason Wang
2018-07-20  0:15 ` [PATCH net-next 5/9] vhost_net: introduce tx_can_batch() Jason Wang
2018-07-20  0:15 ` Jason Wang [this message]
2018-07-20  0:15 ` [PATCH net-next 7/9] vhost_net: rename vhost_rx_signal_used() to vhost_net_signal_used() Jason Wang
2018-07-20  0:15 ` [PATCH net-next 8/9] vhost_net: rename VHOST_RX_BATCH to VHOST_NET_BATCH Jason Wang
2018-07-20  0:15 ` [PATCH net-next 9/9] vhost_net: batch update used ring for datacopy TX Jason Wang
2018-07-22  4:44 ` [PATCH net-next 0/9] TX used ring batched updating for vhost David Miller
2018-07-22 14:37 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2018-07-22 16:44   ` David Miller

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1532045721-4958-7-git-send-email-jasowang@redhat.com \
    --to=jasowang@redhat.com \
    --cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mst@redhat.com \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).