[PATCH] RDS is not Radio Data System

From: Pavel Machek <pavel@ucw.cz>
To: ka-cheong.poon@oracle.com, santosh.shilimkar@oracle.com,
	kernel list <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Netdev list <netdev@vger.kernel.org>
Cc: Netdev list <netdev@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: [PATCH] RDS is not Radio Data System
Date: Sun, 5 Aug 2018 08:59:21 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20180805065920.GA8968@amd> (raw)

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 861 bytes --]

Hi!

Getting prompt "The RDS Protocol" (RDS) is not too helpful, and it is
easily confused with Radio Data System (which we may want to support
in kernel, too).

I wonder if option should be named NET_RDS, instead?

And this sounds like a good idea:

(Plus, we normally have "module will be called foobar" and if unsure
say X. What happened to those?)

diff --git a/net/rds/Kconfig b/net/rds/Kconfig
index 41f7556..2738f14 100644
--- a/net/rds/Kconfig
+++ b/net/rds/Kconfig
@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
 
 config RDS
-	tristate "The RDS Protocol"
+	tristate "The Reliable Datagram Sockets (RDS) Protocol"
 	depends on INET
 	---help---
 	  The RDS (Reliable Datagram Sockets) protocol provides reliable,



-- 
(english) http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek
(cesky, pictures) http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/picture/horses/blog.html

[-- Attachment #2: Digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 181 bytes --]
