linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: kan.liang@linux.intel.com
To: peterz@infradead.org, acme@kernel.org, tglx@linutronix.de,
	mingo@redhat.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: eranian@google.com, jolsa@redhat.com, namhyung@kernel.org,
	ak@linux.intel.com, Kan Liang <kan.liang@linux.intel.com>
Subject: [PATCH RFC 5/7] perf mem: Clean up output format and sort order string
Date: Fri, 10 Aug 2018 06:36:25 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1533908187-25204-5-git-send-email-kan.liang@linux.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1533908187-25204-1-git-send-email-kan.liang@linux.intel.com>

From: Kan Liang <kan.liang@linux.intel.com>

Now, "--phys-data" is the only option which impacts the output format and
sort order. A simple "if else" is enough to handle the option.
But there will be more options added, e.g. "--page-size", which also
impact the output format and sort order. The code will become too
complex to be maintained.

Divide the big printf into several small pieces. Output the specific
piece only if the related option is applied.

Divide the big sort order string into several small pieces as well.
Appends specific sort string only if the related option is applied.

No functional change.

Signed-off-by: Kan Liang <kan.liang@linux.intel.com>
---
 tools/perf/builtin-mem.c | 132 +++++++++++++++++++++++------------------------
 tools/perf/util/sort.h   |   2 +
 2 files changed, 66 insertions(+), 68 deletions(-)

diff --git a/tools/perf/builtin-mem.c b/tools/perf/builtin-mem.c
index 57393e9..6048fca 100644
--- a/tools/perf/builtin-mem.c
+++ b/tools/perf/builtin-mem.c
@@ -14,6 +14,7 @@
 #include "util/mem-events.h"
 #include "util/debug.h"
 #include "util/symbol.h"
+#include "util/sort.h"
 
 #define MEM_OPERATION_LOAD	0x1
 #define MEM_OPERATION_STORE	0x2
@@ -153,7 +154,7 @@ dump_raw_samples(struct perf_tool *tool,
 {
 	struct perf_mem *mem = container_of(tool, struct perf_mem, tool);
 	struct addr_location al;
-	const char *fmt;
+	const char *fmt, *field_sep;
 
 	if (machine__resolve(machine, &al, sample) < 0) {
 		fprintf(stderr, "problem processing %d event, skipping it.\n",
@@ -167,60 +168,45 @@ dump_raw_samples(struct perf_tool *tool,
 	if (al.map != NULL)
 		al.map->dso->hit = 1;
 
-	if (mem->phys_addr) {
-		if (symbol_conf.field_sep) {
-			fmt = "%d%s%d%s0x%"PRIx64"%s0x%"PRIx64"%s0x%016"PRIx64
-			      "%s%"PRIu64"%s0x%"PRIx64"%s%s:%s\n";
-		} else {
-			fmt = "%5d%s%5d%s0x%016"PRIx64"%s0x016%"PRIx64
-			      "%s0x%016"PRIx64"%s%5"PRIu64"%s0x%06"PRIx64
-			      "%s%s:%s\n";
-			symbol_conf.field_sep = " ";
-		}
-
-		printf(fmt,
-			sample->pid,
-			symbol_conf.field_sep,
-			sample->tid,
-			symbol_conf.field_sep,
-			sample->ip,
-			symbol_conf.field_sep,
-			sample->addr,
-			symbol_conf.field_sep,
-			sample->phys_addr,
-			symbol_conf.field_sep,
-			sample->weight,
-			symbol_conf.field_sep,
-			sample->data_src,
-			symbol_conf.field_sep,
-			al.map ? (al.map->dso ? al.map->dso->long_name : "???") : "???",
-			al.sym ? al.sym->name : "???");
+	field_sep = symbol_conf.field_sep;
+	if (field_sep) {
+		fmt = "%d%s%d%s0x%"PRIx64"%s0x%"PRIx64"%s";
 	} else {
-		if (symbol_conf.field_sep) {
-			fmt = "%d%s%d%s0x%"PRIx64"%s0x%"PRIx64"%s%"PRIu64
-			      "%s0x%"PRIx64"%s%s:%s\n";
-		} else {
-			fmt = "%5d%s%5d%s0x%016"PRIx64"%s0x016%"PRIx64
-			      "%s%5"PRIu64"%s0x%06"PRIx64"%s%s:%s\n";
-			symbol_conf.field_sep = " ";
-		}
+		fmt = "%5d%s%5d%s0x%016"PRIx64"%s0x016%"PRIx64"%s";
+		symbol_conf.field_sep = " ";
+	}
+	printf(fmt,
+		sample->pid,
+		symbol_conf.field_sep,
+		sample->tid,
+		symbol_conf.field_sep,
+		sample->ip,
+		symbol_conf.field_sep,
+		sample->addr,
+		symbol_conf.field_sep);
 
+	if (mem->phys_addr) {
+		if (field_sep)
+			fmt = "0x%"PRIx64"%s";
+		else
+			fmt = "0x%016"PRIx64"%s";
 		printf(fmt,
-			sample->pid,
-			symbol_conf.field_sep,
-			sample->tid,
-			symbol_conf.field_sep,
-			sample->ip,
-			symbol_conf.field_sep,
-			sample->addr,
-			symbol_conf.field_sep,
-			sample->weight,
-			symbol_conf.field_sep,
-			sample->data_src,
-			symbol_conf.field_sep,
-			al.map ? (al.map->dso ? al.map->dso->long_name : "???") : "???",
-			al.sym ? al.sym->name : "???");
+			sample->phys_addr,
+			symbol_conf.field_sep);
 	}
+
+	if (field_sep)
+		fmt = "%"PRIu64"%s0x%"PRIx64"%s%s:%s\n";
+	else
+		fmt = "%5"PRIu64"%s0x%06"PRIx64"%s%s:%s\n";
+
+	printf(fmt,
+		sample->weight,
+		symbol_conf.field_sep,
+		sample->data_src,
+		symbol_conf.field_sep,
+		al.map ? (al.map->dso ? al.map->dso->long_name : "???") : "???",
+		al.sym ? al.sym->name : "???");
 out_put:
 	addr_location__put(&al);
 	return 0;
@@ -262,10 +248,12 @@ static int report_raw_events(struct perf_mem *mem)
 	if (ret < 0)
 		goto out_delete;
 
+	printf("# PID, TID, IP, ADDR, ");
+
 	if (mem->phys_addr)
-		printf("# PID, TID, IP, ADDR, PHYS ADDR, LOCAL WEIGHT, DSRC, SYMBOL\n");
-	else
-		printf("# PID, TID, IP, ADDR, LOCAL WEIGHT, DSRC, SYMBOL\n");
+		printf("PHYS ADDR, ");
+
+	printf("LOCAL WEIGHT, DSRC, SYMBOL\n");
 
 	ret = perf_session__process_events(session);
 
@@ -273,11 +261,30 @@ static int report_raw_events(struct perf_mem *mem)
 	perf_session__delete(session);
 	return ret;
 }
+static char *get_sort_order(struct perf_mem *mem)
+{
+	char sort[MAX_SORT_ORDER_STR];
+
+	/*
+	 * there is no weight (cost) associated with stores, so don't print
+	 * the column
+	 */
+	if (mem->operation & MEM_OPERATION_STORE)
+		strcpy(sort, "--sort=mem,sym,dso,symbol_daddr,dso_daddr,tlb,locked");
+	else
+		strcpy(sort, default_mem_sort_order);
+
+	if (mem->phys_addr)
+		strcat(sort, ",phys_daddr");
+
+	return strdup(sort);
+}
 
 static int report_events(int argc, const char **argv, struct perf_mem *mem)
 {
 	const char **rep_argv;
 	int ret, i = 0, j, rep_argc;
+	char *new_sort_order;
 
 	if (mem->dump_raw)
 		return report_raw_events(mem);
@@ -291,20 +298,9 @@ static int report_events(int argc, const char **argv, struct perf_mem *mem)
 	rep_argv[i++] = "--mem-mode";
 	rep_argv[i++] = "-n"; /* display number of samples */
 
-	/*
-	 * there is no weight (cost) associated with stores, so don't print
-	 * the column
-	 */
-	if (!(mem->operation & MEM_OPERATION_LOAD)) {
-		if (mem->phys_addr)
-			rep_argv[i++] = "--sort=mem,sym,dso,symbol_daddr,"
-					"dso_daddr,tlb,locked,phys_daddr";
-		else
-			rep_argv[i++] = "--sort=mem,sym,dso,symbol_daddr,"
-					"dso_daddr,tlb,locked";
-	} else if (mem->phys_addr)
-		rep_argv[i++] = "--sort=local_weight,mem,sym,dso,symbol_daddr,"
-				"dso_daddr,snoop,tlb,locked,phys_daddr";
+	new_sort_order = get_sort_order(mem);
+	if (new_sort_order)
+		rep_argv[i++] = new_sort_order;
 
 	for (j = 1; j < argc; j++, i++)
 		rep_argv[i] = argv[j];
diff --git a/tools/perf/util/sort.h b/tools/perf/util/sort.h
index c6b2f30..4632e25 100644
--- a/tools/perf/util/sort.h
+++ b/tools/perf/util/sort.h
@@ -46,6 +46,8 @@ extern struct sort_entry sort_srcline;
 extern enum sort_type sort__first_dimension;
 extern const char default_mem_sort_order[];
 
+#define MAX_SORT_ORDER_STR	128
+
 struct he_stat {
 	u64			period;
 	u64			period_sys;
-- 
2.7.4


  parent reply	other threads:[~2018-08-10 13:38 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2018-08-10 13:36 [PATCH RFC 1/7] perf/core, x86: Add PERF_SAMPLE_PAGE_SIZE kan.liang
2018-08-10 13:36 ` [PATCH RFC 2/7] perf tools: Support new sample type for page size kan.liang
2018-08-10 13:36 ` [PATCH RFC 3/7] perf script: Support " kan.liang
2018-08-10 13:36 ` [PATCH RFC 4/7] perf sort: Add sort option for " kan.liang
2018-08-10 13:36 ` kan.liang [this message]
2018-08-10 13:36 ` [PATCH RFC 6/7] perf mem: Support " kan.liang
2018-08-10 13:36 ` [PATCH RFC 7/7] perf test: Add test case for PERF_SAMPLE_PAGE_SIZE kan.liang
2018-08-10 20:24 ` [PATCH RFC 1/7] perf/core, x86: Add PERF_SAMPLE_PAGE_SIZE Stephane Eranian

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1533908187-25204-5-git-send-email-kan.liang@linux.intel.com \
    --to=kan.liang@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=acme@kernel.org \
    --cc=ak@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=eranian@google.com \
    --cc=jolsa@redhat.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=namhyung@kernel.org \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).