linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Anurag Kumar Vulisha <anurag.kumar.vulisha@xilinx.com>
To: <balbi@kernel.org>, <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Cc: <v.anuragkumar@gmail.com>, <linux-usb@vger.kernel.org>,
	<linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Anurag Kumar Vulisha <anurag.kumar.vulisha@xilinx.com>
Subject: [PATCH v2 7/8] usb: dwc3: Check for IOC/LST bit in both event->status and TRB->ctrl fields
Date: Fri, 17 Aug 2018 17:54:54 +0530	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1534508695-12642-8-git-send-email-anurag.kumar.vulisha@xilinx.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1534508695-12642-1-git-send-email-anurag.kumar.vulisha@xilinx.com>

The present code in dwc3_gadget_ep_reclaim_completed_trb() will check
for IOC/LST bit in the event->status and returns if IOC/LST bit is
set. This logic doesn't work if multiple TRBs are queued per
request and the IOC/LST bit is set on the last TRB of that request.
Consider an example where a queued request has multiple queued TRBs
and IOC/LST bit is set only for the last TRB. In this case, the Core
generates XferComplete/XferInProgress events only for the last TRB
(since IOC/LST are set only for the last TRB). As per the logic in
dwc3_gadget_ep_reclaim_completed_trb() event->status is checked for
IOC/LST bit and returns on the first TRB. This makes the remaining
TRBs left unhandled.
To aviod this, changed the code to check for IOC/LST bits in both
event->status & TRB->ctrl. This patch does the same.

Signed-off-by: Anurag Kumar Vulisha <anurag.kumar.vulisha@xilinx.com>
---
 Changes in v2:
	1. None
---
 drivers/usb/dwc3/gadget.c | 7 ++++++-
 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/drivers/usb/dwc3/gadget.c b/drivers/usb/dwc3/gadget.c
index 3af55f8..1b1bc14 100644
--- a/drivers/usb/dwc3/gadget.c
+++ b/drivers/usb/dwc3/gadget.c
@@ -2290,7 +2290,12 @@ static int dwc3_gadget_ep_reclaim_completed_trb(struct dwc3_ep *dep,
 	if (event->status & DEPEVT_STATUS_SHORT && !chain)
 		return 1;
 
-	if (event->status & (DEPEVT_STATUS_IOC | DEPEVT_STATUS_LST))
+	if ((event->status & DEPEVT_STATUS_IOC) &&
+	    (trb->ctrl & DWC3_TRB_CTRL_IOC))
+		return 1;
+
+	if ((event->status & DEPEVT_STATUS_LST) &&
+	    (trb->ctrl & DWC3_TRB_CTRL_LST))
 		return 1;
 
 	return 0;
-- 
2.1.1


  parent reply	other threads:[~2018-08-17 12:25 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2018-08-17 12:24 [PATCH v2 0/8] usb: dwc3: Fix broken BULK stream support to dwc3 gadget driver Anurag Kumar Vulisha
2018-08-17 12:24 ` [PATCH v2 1/8] usb: dwc3: Correct the logic for checking TRB full in __dwc3_prepare_one_trb() Anurag Kumar Vulisha
2018-09-05  5:33   ` Thinh Nguyen
2018-09-05  9:19     ` Anurag Kumar Vulisha
2018-09-06  1:58       ` Thinh Nguyen
2018-09-06 15:12         ` Anurag Kumar Vulisha
2018-09-07  2:00           ` Thinh Nguyen
2018-08-17 12:24 ` [PATCH v2 2/8] usb: dwc3: update stream id in depcmd Anurag Kumar Vulisha
2018-08-17 12:24 ` [PATCH v2 3/8] usb: dwc3: make controller clear transfer resources after complete Anurag Kumar Vulisha
2018-09-05  5:38   ` Thinh Nguyen
2018-09-05  9:21     ` Anurag Kumar Vulisha
2018-08-17 12:24 ` [PATCH v2 4/8] usb: dwc3: implement stream transfer timeout Anurag Kumar Vulisha
2018-09-05  6:01   ` Thinh Nguyen
2018-09-05  9:24     ` Anurag Kumar Vulisha
2018-08-17 12:24 ` [PATCH v2 5/8] usb: dwc3: don't issue no-op trb for stream capable endpoints Anurag Kumar Vulisha
2018-08-17 12:24 ` [PATCH v2 6/8] usb: dwc3: check for requests in started list " Anurag Kumar Vulisha
2018-08-17 12:24 ` Anurag Kumar Vulisha [this message]
2018-08-17 12:24 ` [PATCH v2 8/8] usb: dwc3: Check MISSED ISOC bit only for ISOC endpoints Anurag Kumar Vulisha
2018-09-04  9:44 ` [PATCH v2 0/8] usb: dwc3: Fix broken BULK stream support to dwc3 gadget driver Anurag Kumar Vulisha

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1534508695-12642-8-git-send-email-anurag.kumar.vulisha@xilinx.com \
    --to=anurag.kumar.vulisha@xilinx.com \
    --cc=balbi@kernel.org \
    --cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-usb@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=v.anuragkumar@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).