linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Juergen Gross <jgross@suse.com>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
	xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org
Cc: davem@davemloft.net, boris.ostrovsky@oracle.com,
	Juergen Gross <jgross@suse.com>,
	stable@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH] xen/netfront: don't bug in case of too many frags
Date: Tue, 11 Sep 2018 09:04:48 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20180911070448.3958-1-jgross@suse.com> (raw)

Commit 57f230ab04d291 ("xen/netfront: raise max number of slots in
xennet_get_responses()") raised the max number of allowed slots by one.
This seems to be problematic in some configurations with netback using
a larger MAX_SKB_FRAGS value (e.g. old Linux kernel with MAX_SKB_FRAGS
defined as 18 instead of nowadays 17).

Instead of BUG_ON() in this case just fall back to retransmission.

Fixes: 57f230ab04d291 ("xen/netfront: raise max number of slots in xennet_get_responses()")
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Juergen Gross <jgross@suse.com>
---
 drivers/net/xen-netfront.c | 8 +++++++-
 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/drivers/net/xen-netfront.c b/drivers/net/xen-netfront.c
index 9407acbd19a9..f17f602e6171 100644
--- a/drivers/net/xen-netfront.c
+++ b/drivers/net/xen-netfront.c
@@ -908,7 +908,11 @@ static RING_IDX xennet_fill_frags(struct netfront_queue *queue,
 			BUG_ON(pull_to <= skb_headlen(skb));
 			__pskb_pull_tail(skb, pull_to - skb_headlen(skb));
 		}
-		BUG_ON(skb_shinfo(skb)->nr_frags >= MAX_SKB_FRAGS);
+		if (unlikely(skb_shinfo(skb)->nr_frags >= MAX_SKB_FRAGS)) {
+			queue->rx.rsp_cons = ++cons;
+			kfree_skb(nskb);
+			return ~0U;
+		}
 
 		skb_add_rx_frag(skb, skb_shinfo(skb)->nr_frags,
 				skb_frag_page(nfrag),
@@ -1045,6 +1049,8 @@ static int xennet_poll(struct napi_struct *napi, int budget)
 		skb->len += rx->status;
 
 		i = xennet_fill_frags(queue, skb, &tmpq);
+		if (unlikely(i == ~0U))
+			goto err;
 
 		if (rx->flags & XEN_NETRXF_csum_blank)
 			skb->ip_summed = CHECKSUM_PARTIAL;
-- 
2.16.4


             reply	other threads:[~2018-09-11  7:04 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2018-09-11  7:04 Juergen Gross [this message]
2018-09-13 15:22 ` [PATCH] xen/netfront: don't bug in case of too many frags David Miller

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20180911070448.3958-1-jgross@suse.com \
    --to=jgross@suse.com \
    --cc=boris.ostrovsky@oracle.com \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).