linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
To: Jason Cooper <jason@lakedaemon.net>, Andrew Lunn <andrew@lunn.ch>,
	Gregory Clement <gregory.clement@bootlin.com>,
	Sebastian Hesselbarth <sebastian.hesselbarth@gmail.com>,
	"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net>
Cc: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>,
	linux-pm@vger.kernel.org, Stephen Boyd <sboyd@kernel.org>,
	Nishanth Menon <nm@ti.com>,
	Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@linaro.org>,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH V2 08/12] cpufreq: mvebu: Remove OPPs using dev_pm_opp_remove()
Date: Wed, 19 Sep 2018 15:20:27 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <883071c4bd9a6e45bf0b5e45575d110eaeb2e6d0.1537394233.git.viresh.kumar@linaro.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <cover.1537394233.git.viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
In-Reply-To: <cover.1537394233.git.viresh.kumar@linaro.org>

dev_pm_opp_cpumask_remove_table() is going to change in the next commit
and will not remove dynamic OPPs automatically. They must be removed
with a call to dev_pm_opp_remove().

Reviewed-by: Gregory CLEMENT <gregory.clement@bootlin.com>
Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
---
 drivers/cpufreq/mvebu-cpufreq.c | 9 ++-------
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/mvebu-cpufreq.c b/drivers/cpufreq/mvebu-cpufreq.c
index 31513bd42705..6d33a639f902 100644
--- a/drivers/cpufreq/mvebu-cpufreq.c
+++ b/drivers/cpufreq/mvebu-cpufreq.c
@@ -84,9 +84,10 @@ static int __init armada_xp_pmsu_cpufreq_init(void)
 
 		ret = dev_pm_opp_add(cpu_dev, clk_get_rate(clk) / 2, 0);
 		if (ret) {
+			dev_pm_opp_remove(cpu_dev, clk_get_rate(clk));
 			clk_put(clk);
 			dev_err(cpu_dev, "Failed to register OPPs\n");
-			goto opp_register_failed;
+			return ret;
 		}
 
 		ret = dev_pm_opp_set_sharing_cpus(cpu_dev,
@@ -99,11 +100,5 @@ static int __init armada_xp_pmsu_cpufreq_init(void)
 
 	platform_device_register_simple("cpufreq-dt", -1, NULL, 0);
 	return 0;
-
-opp_register_failed:
-	/* As registering has failed remove all the opp for all cpus */
-	dev_pm_opp_cpumask_remove_table(cpu_possible_mask);
-
-	return ret;
 }
 device_initcall(armada_xp_pmsu_cpufreq_init);
-- 
2.14.1


  parent reply	other threads:[~2018-09-19 22:20 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2018-09-19 22:20 [PATCH V2 00/12] OPP: Don't create multiple OPP tables for devices sharing OPP table Viresh Kumar
2018-09-19 22:20 ` [PATCH V2 01/12] OPP: Free OPP table properly on performance state irregularities Viresh Kumar
2018-09-19 22:20 ` [PATCH V2 02/12] OPP: Don't try to remove all OPP tables on failure Viresh Kumar
2018-09-19 22:20 ` [PATCH V2 03/12] OPP: Protect dev_list with opp_table lock Viresh Kumar
2018-09-19 22:20 ` [PATCH V2 04/12] OPP: Pass index to _of_init_opp_table() Viresh Kumar
2018-09-19 22:20 ` [PATCH V2 05/12] OPP: Parse OPP table's DT properties from _of_init_opp_table() Viresh Kumar
2018-09-19 22:20 ` [PATCH V2 06/12] OPP: Don't take OPP table's kref for static OPPs Viresh Kumar
2018-09-19 22:20 ` [PATCH V2 07/12] OPP: Create separate kref for static OPPs list Viresh Kumar
2018-09-19 22:20 ` Viresh Kumar [this message]
2018-09-20  7:59   ` [PATCH V2 08/12] cpufreq: mvebu: Remove OPPs using dev_pm_opp_remove() Rafael J. Wysocki
2018-09-19 22:20 ` [PATCH V2 09/12] OPP: Don't remove dynamic OPPs from _dev_pm_opp_remove_table() Viresh Kumar
2018-09-19 22:20 ` [PATCH V2 10/12] OPP: Use a single mechanism to free the OPP table Viresh Kumar
2018-09-19 22:20 ` [PATCH V2 11/12] OPP: Prevent creating multiple OPP tables for devices sharing OPP nodes Viresh Kumar
2018-09-19 22:20 ` [PATCH V2 12/12] OPP: Pass OPP table to _of_add_opp_table_v{1|2}() Viresh Kumar

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=883071c4bd9a6e45bf0b5e45575d110eaeb2e6d0.1537394233.git.viresh.kumar@linaro.org \
    --to=viresh.kumar@linaro.org \
    --cc=andrew@lunn.ch \
    --cc=gregory.clement@bootlin.com \
    --cc=jason@lakedaemon.net \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-pm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=nm@ti.com \
    --cc=rjw@rjwysocki.net \
    --cc=sboyd@kernel.org \
    --cc=sebastian.hesselbarth@gmail.com \
    --cc=vincent.guittot@linaro.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).