linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: zhong jiang <zhongjiang@huawei.com>
To: <gregkh@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: <iamjoonsoo.kim@lge.com>, <rientjes@google.com>, <cl@linux.com>,
	<penberg@kernel.org>, <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	<mhocko@suse.com>, <linux-mm@kvack.org>,
	<linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, <stable@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: [STABLE PATCH] slub: make ->cpu_partial unsigned int
Date: Thu, 27 Sep 2018 22:43:40 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1538059420-14439-1-git-send-email-zhongjiang@huawei.com> (raw)

From: Alexey Dobriyan <adobriyan@gmail.com>

        /*
         * cpu_partial determined the maximum number of objects
         * kept in the per cpu partial lists of a processor.
         */

Can't be negative.

I hit a real issue that it will result in a large number of memory leak.
Because Freeing slabs are in interrupt context. So it can trigger this issue.
put_cpu_partial can be interrupted more than once.
due to a union struct of lru and pobjects in struct page, when other core handles
page->lru list, for eaxmple, remove_partial in freeing slab code flow, It will
result in pobjects being a negative value(0xdead0000). Therefore, a large number
of slabs will be added to per_cpu partial list.

I had posted the issue to community before. The detailed issue description is as follows.

Link: https://www.spinics.net/lists/kernel/msg2870979.html

After applying the patch, The issue is fixed. So the patch is a effective bugfix.
It should go into stable.

Signed-off-by: Alexey Dobriyan <adobriyan@gmail.com>
Acked-by: Christoph Lameter <cl@linux.com>
Cc: Pekka Enberg <penberg@kernel.org>
Cc: David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>
Cc: Joonsoo Kim <iamjoonsoo.kim@lge.com>
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org 
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: zhong jiang <zhongjiang@huawei.com>
---
 include/linux/slub_def.h | 3 ++-
 mm/slub.c                | 6 +++---
 2 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

diff --git a/include/linux/slub_def.h b/include/linux/slub_def.h
index 3388511..9b681f2 100644
--- a/include/linux/slub_def.h
+++ b/include/linux/slub_def.h
@@ -67,7 +67,8 @@ struct kmem_cache {
 	int size;		/* The size of an object including meta data */
 	int object_size;	/* The size of an object without meta data */
 	int offset;		/* Free pointer offset. */
-	int cpu_partial;	/* Number of per cpu partial objects to keep around */
+	/* Number of per cpu partial objects to keep around */
+	unsigned int cpu_partial;
 	struct kmem_cache_order_objects oo;
 
 	/* Allocation and freeing of slabs */
diff --git a/mm/slub.c b/mm/slub.c
index 2284c43..c33b0e1 100644
--- a/mm/slub.c
+++ b/mm/slub.c
@@ -1661,7 +1661,7 @@ static void *get_partial_node(struct kmem_cache *s, struct kmem_cache_node *n,
 {
 	struct page *page, *page2;
 	void *object = NULL;
-	int available = 0;
+	unsigned int available = 0;
 	int objects;
 
 	/*
@@ -4674,10 +4674,10 @@ static ssize_t cpu_partial_show(struct kmem_cache *s, char *buf)
 static ssize_t cpu_partial_store(struct kmem_cache *s, const char *buf,
 				 size_t length)
 {
-	unsigned long objects;
+	unsigned int objects;
 	int err;
 
-	err = kstrtoul(buf, 10, &objects);
+	err = kstrtouint(buf, 10, &objects);
 	if (err)
 		return err;
 	if (objects && !kmem_cache_has_cpu_partial(s))
-- 
1.7.12.4


             reply	other threads:[~2018-09-27 14:56 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2018-09-27 14:43 zhong jiang [this message]
2018-09-27 15:26 ` [STABLE PATCH] slub: make ->cpu_partial unsigned int Christopher Lameter
2018-09-27 15:46 ` Greg KH
2018-09-28  8:06   ` zhong jiang
2018-09-30 10:28 zhong jiang
2018-09-30 12:37 ` Greg KH
2018-09-30 12:50 ` Matthew Wilcox
2018-09-30 13:10   ` Greg KH
2018-09-30 13:23     ` Matthew Wilcox
2018-10-02 14:50       ` Christopher Lameter

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1538059420-14439-1-git-send-email-zhongjiang@huawei.com \
    --to=zhongjiang@huawei.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=cl@linux.com \
    --cc=gregkh@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=iamjoonsoo.kim@lge.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=mhocko@suse.com \
    --cc=penberg@kernel.org \
    --cc=rientjes@google.com \
    --cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).