linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Waiman Long <longman@redhat.com>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>, Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Waiman Long <longman@redhat.com>
Subject: [PATCH 5/5] locking/lockdep: Call lock_release after releasing the lock
Date: Fri, 28 Sep 2018 13:53:21 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1538157201-29173-6-git-send-email-longman@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1538157201-29173-1-git-send-email-longman@redhat.com>

Currently, lock_acquire() is called before acquiring the lock and
lock_release() is called before the releasing the lock. As a result,
the execution time of lock_release() is added to the lock hold time
reducing locking throughput, especially for spinlocks and rwlocks which
tend to have a much shorter lock hold time.

As lock_release() is not going to update any shared data that needs
protection from the lock, we don't actually need to call it before
releasing the lock. So the lock_release() calls are now postponed to
after releasing the lock for spinlocks and rwlocks.

Signed-off-by: Waiman Long <longman@redhat.com>
---
 include/linux/rwlock_api_smp.h   | 16 ++++++++--------
 include/linux/spinlock_api_smp.h |  8 ++++----
 2 files changed, 12 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)

diff --git a/include/linux/rwlock_api_smp.h b/include/linux/rwlock_api_smp.h
index 86ebb4b..b026940 100644
--- a/include/linux/rwlock_api_smp.h
+++ b/include/linux/rwlock_api_smp.h
@@ -215,63 +215,63 @@ static inline void __raw_write_lock(rwlock_t *lock)
 
 static inline void __raw_write_unlock(rwlock_t *lock)
 {
-	rwlock_release(&lock->dep_map, 1, _RET_IP_);
 	do_raw_write_unlock(lock);
+	rwlock_release(&lock->dep_map, 1, _RET_IP_);
 	preempt_enable();
 }
 
 static inline void __raw_read_unlock(rwlock_t *lock)
 {
-	rwlock_release(&lock->dep_map, 1, _RET_IP_);
 	do_raw_read_unlock(lock);
+	rwlock_release(&lock->dep_map, 1, _RET_IP_);
 	preempt_enable();
 }
 
 static inline void
 __raw_read_unlock_irqrestore(rwlock_t *lock, unsigned long flags)
 {
-	rwlock_release(&lock->dep_map, 1, _RET_IP_);
 	do_raw_read_unlock(lock);
+	rwlock_release(&lock->dep_map, 1, _RET_IP_);
 	local_irq_restore(flags);
 	preempt_enable();
 }
 
 static inline void __raw_read_unlock_irq(rwlock_t *lock)
 {
-	rwlock_release(&lock->dep_map, 1, _RET_IP_);
 	do_raw_read_unlock(lock);
+	rwlock_release(&lock->dep_map, 1, _RET_IP_);
 	local_irq_enable();
 	preempt_enable();
 }
 
 static inline void __raw_read_unlock_bh(rwlock_t *lock)
 {
-	rwlock_release(&lock->dep_map, 1, _RET_IP_);
 	do_raw_read_unlock(lock);
+	rwlock_release(&lock->dep_map, 1, _RET_IP_);
 	__local_bh_enable_ip(_RET_IP_, SOFTIRQ_LOCK_OFFSET);
 }
 
 static inline void __raw_write_unlock_irqrestore(rwlock_t *lock,
 					     unsigned long flags)
 {
-	rwlock_release(&lock->dep_map, 1, _RET_IP_);
 	do_raw_write_unlock(lock);
+	rwlock_release(&lock->dep_map, 1, _RET_IP_);
 	local_irq_restore(flags);
 	preempt_enable();
 }
 
 static inline void __raw_write_unlock_irq(rwlock_t *lock)
 {
-	rwlock_release(&lock->dep_map, 1, _RET_IP_);
 	do_raw_write_unlock(lock);
+	rwlock_release(&lock->dep_map, 1, _RET_IP_);
 	local_irq_enable();
 	preempt_enable();
 }
 
 static inline void __raw_write_unlock_bh(rwlock_t *lock)
 {
-	rwlock_release(&lock->dep_map, 1, _RET_IP_);
 	do_raw_write_unlock(lock);
+	rwlock_release(&lock->dep_map, 1, _RET_IP_);
 	__local_bh_enable_ip(_RET_IP_, SOFTIRQ_LOCK_OFFSET);
 }
 
diff --git a/include/linux/spinlock_api_smp.h b/include/linux/spinlock_api_smp.h
index 42dfab8..fcb84df 100644
--- a/include/linux/spinlock_api_smp.h
+++ b/include/linux/spinlock_api_smp.h
@@ -147,32 +147,32 @@ static inline void __raw_spin_lock(raw_spinlock_t *lock)
 
 static inline void __raw_spin_unlock(raw_spinlock_t *lock)
 {
-	spin_release(&lock->dep_map, 1, _RET_IP_);
 	do_raw_spin_unlock(lock);
+	spin_release(&lock->dep_map, 1, _RET_IP_);
 	preempt_enable();
 }
 
 static inline void __raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(raw_spinlock_t *lock,
 					    unsigned long flags)
 {
-	spin_release(&lock->dep_map, 1, _RET_IP_);
 	do_raw_spin_unlock(lock);
+	spin_release(&lock->dep_map, 1, _RET_IP_);
 	local_irq_restore(flags);
 	preempt_enable();
 }
 
 static inline void __raw_spin_unlock_irq(raw_spinlock_t *lock)
 {
-	spin_release(&lock->dep_map, 1, _RET_IP_);
 	do_raw_spin_unlock(lock);
+	spin_release(&lock->dep_map, 1, _RET_IP_);
 	local_irq_enable();
 	preempt_enable();
 }
 
 static inline void __raw_spin_unlock_bh(raw_spinlock_t *lock)
 {
-	spin_release(&lock->dep_map, 1, _RET_IP_);
 	do_raw_spin_unlock(lock);
+	spin_release(&lock->dep_map, 1, _RET_IP_);
 	__local_bh_enable_ip(_RET_IP_, SOFTIRQ_LOCK_OFFSET);
 }
 
-- 
1.8.3.1


  parent reply	other threads:[~2018-09-28 17:53 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2018-09-28 17:53 [PATCH 0/5] locking/lockdep: Improve lockdep performance Waiman Long
2018-09-28 17:53 ` [PATCH 1/5] locking/lockdep: Remove add_chain_cache_classes() Waiman Long
2018-09-28 17:53 ` [PATCH 2/5] locking/lockdep: Eliminate redundant irqs check in __lock_acquire() Waiman Long
2018-10-02  9:06   ` Ingo Molnar
2018-09-28 17:53 ` [PATCH 3/5] locking/lockdep: Add a faster path in __lock_release() Waiman Long
2018-10-02  9:03   ` Ingo Molnar
2018-09-28 17:53 ` [PATCH 4/5] locking/lockdep: Make class->ops a percpu counter Waiman Long
2018-09-28 20:25   ` kbuild test robot
2018-09-28 20:31     ` Waiman Long
2018-09-28 20:42   ` kbuild test robot
2018-10-02  9:39   ` Peter Zijlstra
2018-10-02  9:55     ` Ingo Molnar
2018-10-02 14:10       ` Waiman Long
2018-10-02 14:28         ` Peter Zijlstra
2018-10-02 18:53           ` Ingo Molnar
2018-09-28 17:53 ` Waiman Long [this message]
2018-10-02  9:08   ` [PATCH 5/5] locking/lockdep: Call lock_release after releasing the lock Ingo Molnar
2018-10-02  9:06 ` [PATCH 0/5] locking/lockdep: Improve lockdep performance Ingo Molnar
2018-10-02 13:57   ` Waiman Long

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1538157201-29173-6-git-send-email-longman@redhat.com \
    --to=longman@redhat.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=will.deacon@arm.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).