From: Oscar Salvador <osalvador@techadventures.net>
To: akpm@linux-foundation.org
Cc: mhocko@suse.com, dan.j.williams@intel.com,
yasu.isimatu@gmail.com, rppt@linux.vnet.ibm.com,
malat@debian.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
pavel.tatashin@microsoft.com, jglisse@redhat.com,
Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com, rafael@kernel.org, david@redhat.com,
dave.jiang@intel.com, linux-mm@kvack.org,
alexander.h.duyck@linux.intel.com,
Oscar Salvador <osalvador@suse.de>
Subject: [PATCH 5/5] mm/memory-hotplug: Rework unregister_mem_sect_under_nodes
Date: Mon, 15 Oct 2018 17:30:34 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20181015153034.32203-6-osalvador@techadventures.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20181015153034.32203-1-osalvador@techadventures.net>
From: Oscar Salvador <osalvador@suse.de>
This tries to address another issue about accessing
unitiliazed pages.
Jonathan reported a problem [1] where we can access steal pages
in case we hot-remove memory without onlining it first.
This time is in unregister_mem_sect_under_nodes.
This function tries to get the nid from the pfn and then
tries to remove the symlink between mem_blk <-> nid and vice versa.
Since we already know the nid in remove_memory(), we can pass
it down the chain to unregister_mem_sect_under_nodes.
There we can just remove the symlinks without the need
to look into the pages.
[1] https://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-mm/msg161316.html
Signed-off-by: Oscar Salvador <osalvador@suse.de>
---
drivers/base/memory.c | 9 ++++-----
drivers/base/node.c | 38 +++++++-------------------------------
include/linux/memory.h | 2 +-
include/linux/node.h | 9 ++++-----
mm/memory_hotplug.c | 2 +-
5 files changed, 17 insertions(+), 43 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/base/memory.c b/drivers/base/memory.c
index 0e5985682642..3d8c65d84bea 100644
--- a/drivers/base/memory.c
+++ b/drivers/base/memory.c
@@ -744,8 +744,7 @@ unregister_memory(struct memory_block *memory)
device_unregister(&memory->dev);
}
-static int remove_memory_section(unsigned long node_id,
- struct mem_section *section, int phys_device)
+static int remove_memory_section(unsigned long nid, struct mem_section *section)
{
struct memory_block *mem;
@@ -759,7 +758,7 @@ static int remove_memory_section(unsigned long node_id,
if (!mem)
goto out_unlock;
- unregister_mem_sect_under_nodes(mem, __section_nr(section));
+ unregister_mem_sect_under_nodes(nid, mem);
mem->section_count--;
if (mem->section_count == 0)
@@ -772,12 +771,12 @@ static int remove_memory_section(unsigned long node_id,
return 0;
}
-int unregister_memory_section(struct mem_section *section)
+int unregister_memory_section(int nid, struct mem_section *section)
{
if (!present_section(section))
return -EINVAL;
- return remove_memory_section(0, section, 0);
+ return remove_memory_section(nid, section);
}
#endif /* CONFIG_MEMORY_HOTREMOVE */
diff --git a/drivers/base/node.c b/drivers/base/node.c
index 86d6cd92ce3d..65bc5920bd3d 100644
--- a/drivers/base/node.c
+++ b/drivers/base/node.c
@@ -453,40 +453,16 @@ int register_mem_sect_under_node(struct memory_block *mem_blk, void *arg)
return 0;
}
-/* unregister memory section under all nodes that it spans */
-int unregister_mem_sect_under_nodes(struct memory_block *mem_blk,
- unsigned long phys_index)
+/*
+ * This mem_blk is going to be removed, so let us remove the link
+ * to the node and vice versa
+ */
+void unregister_mem_sect_under_nodes(int nid, struct memory_block *mem_blk)
{
- NODEMASK_ALLOC(nodemask_t, unlinked_nodes, GFP_KERNEL);
- unsigned long pfn, sect_start_pfn, sect_end_pfn;
-
- if (!mem_blk) {
- NODEMASK_FREE(unlinked_nodes);
- return -EFAULT;
- }
- if (!unlinked_nodes)
- return -ENOMEM;
- nodes_clear(*unlinked_nodes);
-
- sect_start_pfn = section_nr_to_pfn(phys_index);
- sect_end_pfn = sect_start_pfn + PAGES_PER_SECTION - 1;
- for (pfn = sect_start_pfn; pfn <= sect_end_pfn; pfn++) {
- int nid;
-
- nid = get_nid_for_pfn(pfn);
- if (nid < 0)
- continue;
- if (!node_online(nid))
- continue;
- if (node_test_and_set(nid, *unlinked_nodes))
- continue;
- sysfs_remove_link(&node_devices[nid]->dev.kobj,
+ sysfs_remove_link(&node_devices[nid]->dev.kobj,
kobject_name(&mem_blk->dev.kobj));
- sysfs_remove_link(&mem_blk->dev.kobj,
+ sysfs_remove_link(&mem_blk->dev.kobj,
kobject_name(&node_devices[nid]->dev.kobj));
- }
- NODEMASK_FREE(unlinked_nodes);
- return 0;
}
int link_mem_sections(int nid, unsigned long start_pfn, unsigned long end_pfn)
diff --git a/include/linux/memory.h b/include/linux/memory.h
index a6ddefc60517..d75ec88ca09d 100644
--- a/include/linux/memory.h
+++ b/include/linux/memory.h
@@ -113,7 +113,7 @@ extern int register_memory_isolate_notifier(struct notifier_block *nb);
extern void unregister_memory_isolate_notifier(struct notifier_block *nb);
int hotplug_memory_register(int nid, struct mem_section *section);
#ifdef CONFIG_MEMORY_HOTREMOVE
-extern int unregister_memory_section(struct mem_section *);
+extern int unregister_memory_section(int nid, struct mem_section *);
#endif
extern int memory_dev_init(void);
extern int memory_notify(unsigned long val, void *v);
diff --git a/include/linux/node.h b/include/linux/node.h
index 257bb3d6d014..dddead9937ab 100644
--- a/include/linux/node.h
+++ b/include/linux/node.h
@@ -72,8 +72,8 @@ extern int register_cpu_under_node(unsigned int cpu, unsigned int nid);
extern int unregister_cpu_under_node(unsigned int cpu, unsigned int nid);
extern int register_mem_sect_under_node(struct memory_block *mem_blk,
void *arg);
-extern int unregister_mem_sect_under_nodes(struct memory_block *mem_blk,
- unsigned long phys_index);
+extern void unregister_mem_sect_under_nodes(int nid,
+ struct memory_block *mem_blk);
#ifdef CONFIG_HUGETLBFS
extern void register_hugetlbfs_with_node(node_registration_func_t doregister,
@@ -105,10 +105,9 @@ static inline int register_mem_sect_under_node(struct memory_block *mem_blk,
{
return 0;
}
-static inline int unregister_mem_sect_under_nodes(struct memory_block *mem_blk,
- unsigned long phys_index)
+static inline void unregister_mem_sect_under_nodes(int nid,
+ struct memory_block *mem_blk)
{
- return 0;
}
static inline void register_hugetlbfs_with_node(node_registration_func_t reg,
diff --git a/mm/memory_hotplug.c b/mm/memory_hotplug.c
index 6b98321aa52f..66ccbb5b8a88 100644
--- a/mm/memory_hotplug.c
+++ b/mm/memory_hotplug.c
@@ -528,7 +528,7 @@ static int __remove_section(int nid, struct mem_section *ms,
if (!valid_section(ms))
return ret;
- ret = unregister_memory_section(ms);
+ ret = unregister_memory_section(nid, ms);
if (ret)
return ret;
--
2.13.6
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-10-15 15:31 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-10-15 15:30 [PATCH 0/5] Do not touch pages/zones during hot-remove path Oscar Salvador
2018-10-15 15:30 ` [PATCH 1/5] mm/memory_hotplug: Add nid parameter to arch_remove_memory Oscar Salvador
2018-11-12 18:52 ` Pavel Tatashin
2018-10-15 15:30 ` [PATCH 2/5] mm/memory_hotplug: Create add/del_device_memory functions Oscar Salvador
2018-10-16 8:55 ` David Hildenbrand
2018-10-17 9:33 ` Oscar Salvador
2018-10-17 9:45 ` David Hildenbrand
2018-10-18 6:57 ` Oscar Salvador
2018-11-12 19:14 ` Pavel Tatashin
2018-11-12 19:21 ` Dan Williams
2018-11-12 21:28 ` Pavel Tatashin
2018-11-16 13:06 ` osalvador
2018-11-16 13:03 ` osalvador
2018-10-15 15:30 ` [PATCH 3/5] mm/memory_hotplug: Check for IORESOURCE_SYSRAM in release_mem_region_adjustable Oscar Salvador
2018-10-16 9:54 ` David Hildenbrand
2018-11-12 19:27 ` Pavel Tatashin
2018-10-15 15:30 ` [PATCH 4/5] mm/memory_hotplug: Move zone/pages handling to offline stage Oscar Salvador
2018-10-15 15:30 ` Oscar Salvador [this message]
2018-10-18 14:24 ` [PATCH 5/5] mm/memory-hotplug: Rework unregister_mem_sect_under_nodes Jonathan Cameron
2018-10-18 15:02 ` Oscar Salvador
2018-10-18 15:38 ` Jonathan Cameron
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20181015153034.32203-6-osalvador@techadventures.net \
--to=osalvador@techadventures.net \
--cc=Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=alexander.h.duyck@linux.intel.com \
--cc=dan.j.williams@intel.com \
--cc=dave.jiang@intel.com \
--cc=david@redhat.com \
--cc=jglisse@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=malat@debian.org \
--cc=mhocko@suse.com \
--cc=osalvador@suse.de \
--cc=pavel.tatashin@microsoft.com \
--cc=rafael@kernel.org \
--cc=rppt@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=yasu.isimatu@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).