platform-driver-x86.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Mark Pearson <mpearson-lenovo@squebb.ca>
To: mpearson-lenovo@squebb.ca
Cc: hdegoede@redhat.com, markgross@kernel.org,
	markpearson@lenovo.com, platform-driver-x86@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH v3 2/3] platform/x86: think-lmi: Add possible_values for ThinkStation
Date: Fri, 17 Mar 2023 11:46:34 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20230317154635.39692-2-mpearson-lenovo@squebb.ca> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230317154635.39692-1-mpearson-lenovo@squebb.ca>

ThinkStation platforms don't support the API to return possible_values
but instead embed it in the settings string.

Try and extract this information and set the possible_values attribute
appropriately.

If there aren't any values possible then don't display possible_values.

Signed-off-by: Mark Pearson <mpearson-lenovo@squebb.ca>
---
Changes in V3:
 - Use is_visible attribute to determine if possible_values should be
   available
 - Code got refactored a bit to make compilation cleaner
Changes in V2:
 - Move no value for possible_values handling into show function
 - use kstrndup for allocating string

 drivers/platform/x86/think-lmi.c | 82 ++++++++++++++++++++++----------
 1 file changed, 56 insertions(+), 26 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/platform/x86/think-lmi.c b/drivers/platform/x86/think-lmi.c
index 5fa5451c4802..d89a1c9bdbf1 100644
--- a/drivers/platform/x86/think-lmi.c
+++ b/drivers/platform/x86/think-lmi.c
@@ -917,6 +917,8 @@ static ssize_t display_name_show(struct kobject *kobj, struct kobj_attribute *at
 	return sysfs_emit(buf, "%s\n", setting->display_name);
 }
 
+static struct kobj_attribute attr_displ_name = __ATTR_RO(display_name);
+
 static ssize_t current_value_show(struct kobject *kobj, struct kobj_attribute *attr, char *buf)
 {
 	struct tlmi_attr_setting *setting = to_tlmi_attr_setting(kobj);
@@ -937,30 +939,6 @@ static ssize_t current_value_show(struct kobject *kobj, struct kobj_attribute *a
 	return ret;
 }
 
-static ssize_t possible_values_show(struct kobject *kobj, struct kobj_attribute *attr, char *buf)
-{
-	struct tlmi_attr_setting *setting = to_tlmi_attr_setting(kobj);
-
-	if (!tlmi_priv.can_get_bios_selections)
-		return -EOPNOTSUPP;
-
-	return sysfs_emit(buf, "%s\n", setting->possible_values);
-}
-
-static ssize_t type_show(struct kobject *kobj, struct kobj_attribute *attr,
-		char *buf)
-{
-	struct tlmi_attr_setting *setting = to_tlmi_attr_setting(kobj);
-
-	if (setting->possible_values) {
-		/* Figure out what setting type is as BIOS does not return this */
-		if (strchr(setting->possible_values, ','))
-			return sysfs_emit(buf, "enumeration\n");
-	}
-	/* Anything else is going to be a string */
-	return sysfs_emit(buf, "string\n");
-}
-
 static ssize_t current_value_store(struct kobject *kobj,
 		struct kobj_attribute *attr,
 		const char *buf, size_t count)
@@ -1044,14 +1022,46 @@ static ssize_t current_value_store(struct kobject *kobj,
 	return ret ?: count;
 }
 
-static struct kobj_attribute attr_displ_name = __ATTR_RO(display_name);
+static struct kobj_attribute attr_current_val = __ATTR_RW_MODE(current_value, 0600);
+
+static ssize_t possible_values_show(struct kobject *kobj, struct kobj_attribute *attr, char *buf)
+{
+	struct tlmi_attr_setting *setting = to_tlmi_attr_setting(kobj);
+
+	return sysfs_emit(buf, "%s\n", setting->possible_values);
+}
 
 static struct kobj_attribute attr_possible_values = __ATTR_RO(possible_values);
 
-static struct kobj_attribute attr_current_val = __ATTR_RW_MODE(current_value, 0600);
+static ssize_t type_show(struct kobject *kobj, struct kobj_attribute *attr,
+		char *buf)
+{
+	struct tlmi_attr_setting *setting = to_tlmi_attr_setting(kobj);
+
+	if (setting->possible_values) {
+		/* Figure out what setting type is as BIOS does not return this */
+		if (strchr(setting->possible_values, ','))
+			return sysfs_emit(buf, "enumeration\n");
+	}
+	/* Anything else is going to be a string */
+	return sysfs_emit(buf, "string\n");
+}
 
 static struct kobj_attribute attr_type = __ATTR_RO(type);
 
+static umode_t attr_is_visible(struct kobject *kobj,
+					     struct attribute *attr, int n)
+{
+	struct tlmi_attr_setting *setting = to_tlmi_attr_setting(kobj);
+
+	/* We don't want to display possible_values attributes if not available */
+	if (attr == (struct attribute *)&attr_possible_values)
+		if (!setting->possible_values)
+			return 0;
+
+	return attr->mode;
+}
+
 static struct attribute *tlmi_attrs[] = {
 	&attr_displ_name.attr,
 	&attr_current_val.attr,
@@ -1061,6 +1071,7 @@ static struct attribute *tlmi_attrs[] = {
 };
 
 static const struct attribute_group tlmi_attr_group = {
+	.is_visible = attr_is_visible,
 	.attrs = tlmi_attrs,
 };
 
@@ -1440,6 +1451,25 @@ static int tlmi_analyze(void)
 			if (ret || !setting->possible_values)
 				pr_info("Error retrieving possible values for %d : %s\n",
 						i, setting->display_name);
+		} else {
+			/*
+			 * Older Thinkstations don't support the bios_selections API.
+			 * Instead they store this as a [Optional:Option1,Option2] section of the
+			 * name string.
+			 * Try and pull that out if it's available.
+			 */
+			char *item, *optstart, *optend;
+
+			if (!tlmi_setting(setting->index, &item, LENOVO_BIOS_SETTING_GUID)) {
+				optstart = strstr(item, "[Optional:");
+				if (optstart) {
+					optstart += strlen("[Optional:");
+					optend = strstr(optstart, "]");
+					if (optend)
+						setting->possible_values =
+							kstrndup(optstart, optend - optstart, GFP_KERNEL);
+				}
+			}
 		}
 		kobject_init(&setting->kobj, &tlmi_attr_setting_ktype);
 		tlmi_priv.setting[i] = setting;
-- 
2.39.2


  reply	other threads:[~2023-03-17 15:47 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-03-17 15:46 [PATCH v3 1/3] platform/x86: think-lmi: add missing type attribute Mark Pearson
2023-03-17 15:46 ` Mark Pearson [this message]
2023-03-18 16:35   ` [PATCH v3 2/3] platform/x86: think-lmi: Add possible_values for ThinkStation Thomas Weißschuh
2023-03-18 17:53     ` Mark Pearson
2023-03-18 23:52       ` Thomas Weißschuh
2023-03-19  0:08         ` Mark Pearson
2023-03-19  9:34           ` Hans de Goede
2023-03-18 17:59     ` Mark Pearson
2023-03-19  0:01       ` Thomas Weißschuh
2023-03-19  0:04         ` Mark Pearson
2023-03-17 15:46 ` [PATCH v3 3/3] platform/x86: think-lmi: use correct possible_values delimters Mark Pearson
2023-03-18 14:37   ` Barnabás Pőcze
2023-03-18 17:55     ` Mark Pearson
2023-03-18 16:39   ` Thomas Weißschuh
2023-03-18 18:06     ` Mark Pearson
2023-03-19  0:11       ` Thomas Weißschuh
2023-03-19  0:18         ` Mark Pearson
2023-03-20  0:52 ` [PATCH v3 1/3] platform/x86: think-lmi: add missing type attribute Limonciello, Mario

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20230317154635.39692-2-mpearson-lenovo@squebb.ca \
    --to=mpearson-lenovo@squebb.ca \
    --cc=hdegoede@redhat.com \
    --cc=markgross@kernel.org \
    --cc=markpearson@lenovo.com \
    --cc=platform-driver-x86@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).