From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 52783C05027 for ; Wed, 1 Feb 2023 19:46:53 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S230377AbjBATqw (ORCPT ); Wed, 1 Feb 2023 14:46:52 -0500 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:57350 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S230301AbjBATqp (ORCPT ); Wed, 1 Feb 2023 14:46:45 -0500 Received: from mga11.intel.com (mga11.intel.com [192.55.52.93]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 665A184188; Wed, 1 Feb 2023 11:46:30 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=intel.com; i=@intel.com; q=dns/txt; s=Intel; t=1675280791; x=1706816791; h=message-id:date:mime-version:subject:to:cc:references: from:in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding; bh=5d9faIyt3THLEq6wTmtBD/I94RAQ6aWlbTrJuUrhtBs=; b=bQQzlckcaP9Yk9nA15Wh+zpkFtdtcSJTtuCguRC6vx7y0DN0t5MlXIEX H9GtiYZuhMp7lFN2L4Yd4okJ+lemkTfK//ytj9VpogVyAbRiEbw16Ewfk oi8fnraZpZRajDp7FcWbCVHE6uJ8D3+GBDeEeQ0QjmfHDDR62s6oXzSZp af2tQrS2NMuDU/x+P0KG7hXFBHcZUMCz10zXwwLBOnMS6wvERDRQdceEH A6gQBj8EPBG7dsO8YfZLCpPh6Bc/l5AxD0Fw57iEthUnDfhcupVKRCbx+ hFpk6Z1uIzM87zJbOKIBU3mu5cPzNliygNOHTFXQWpJQLr+u6iqsaJ8PS g==; X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6500,9779,10608"; a="325951345" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.97,265,1669104000"; d="scan'208";a="325951345" Received: from fmsmga005.fm.intel.com ([10.253.24.32]) by fmsmga102.fm.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 01 Feb 2023 11:45:46 -0800 X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6500,9779,10608"; a="993811995" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.97,265,1669104000"; d="scan'208";a="993811995" Received: from sgkhacha-mobl1.amr.corp.intel.com (HELO [10.212.227.86]) ([10.212.227.86]) by fmsmga005-auth.fm.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 01 Feb 2023 11:45:45 -0800 Message-ID: <6a675f9b-2bbb-9317-2015-0b3362e49fdc@intel.com> Date: Wed, 1 Feb 2023 11:45:44 -0800 MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:102.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/102.6.1 Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/5] platform/x86/intel/ifs: Implement Array BIST test Content-Language: en-US To: Jithu Joseph , hdegoede@redhat.com, markgross@kernel.org Cc: tglx@linutronix.de, mingo@redhat.com, bp@alien8.de, dave.hansen@linux.intel.com, x86@kernel.org, hpa@zytor.com, gregkh@linuxfoundation.org, rostedt@goodmis.org, ashok.raj@intel.com, tony.luck@intel.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, platform-driver-x86@vger.kernel.org, patches@lists.linux.dev, ravi.v.shankar@intel.com, thiago.macieira@intel.com, athenas.jimenez.gonzalez@intel.com, sohil.mehta@intel.com References: <20230131234302.3997223-1-jithu.joseph@intel.com> <20230131234302.3997223-5-jithu.joseph@intel.com> From: Dave Hansen In-Reply-To: <20230131234302.3997223-5-jithu.joseph@intel.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: platform-driver-x86@vger.kernel.org On 1/31/23 15:43, Jithu Joseph wrote: > +static void ifs_array_test_core(int cpu, struct device *dev) > +{ > + union ifs_array activate, status; > + bool timed_out = false; > + struct ifs_data *ifsd; > + unsigned long timeout; > + u64 msrvals[2]; > + > + ifsd = ifs_get_data(dev); > + > + activate.data = 0; > + activate.array_bitmask = ~0U; > + activate.ctrl_result = 0; I think this whole 'ifs_array' as a union thing is bogus. It's actually obfuscating and *COMPLICATING* the code more than anything. Look what you have: union ifs_array activate; // declare it on the stack, unzeroed activate.data = 0; // zero the structure; activate.array_bitmask = ~0U; // set one field activate.ctrl_result = 0; // set the field to zero again??? Can we make it less obfuscated? How about: struct ifs_array activate = {}; // zero it ... activate.array_bitmask = ~0U; // set the only nonzero field Voila! Less code, less obfuscation, less duplicated effort. Or, worst case: struct ifs_array activate; ... memset(&activate, 0, sizeof(activate)); activate.array_bitmask = ~0U; That's sane and everyone knows what it does and doesn't have to know what unions are involved or how they are used. It's correct code no matter *WHAT* craziness lies within 'activate'.