From: Lukas Bulwahn <lukas.bulwahn@gmail.com>
To: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@intel.com>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>, Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>,
X86 ML <x86@kernel.org>, Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@infradead.org>,
"H . Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
Darren Hart <dvhart@infradead.org>,
Andy Shevchenko <andy@infradead.org>,
Lubomir Rintel <lkundrak@v3.sk>, Pavel Machek <pavel@ucw.cz>,
Lee Jones <lee.jones@linaro.org>,
"Rafael J . Wysocki" <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>,
Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com>,
Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>,
platform-driver-x86@vger.kernel.org,
kernel-janitors <kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/9] Kconfig symbol clean-up on ./arch/x86/
Date: Tue, 3 Aug 2021 17:12:47 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAKXUXMxQ83T7beOTuZ928=-eo2Tsr94TGxsaYh3+MHOJrDO8Bg@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <f9074e8d-9314-9d7d-7bf5-5b5538c8be8d@intel.com>
On Tue, Aug 3, 2021 at 4:32 PM Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@intel.com> wrote:
>
> On 8/3/21 4:35 AM, Lukas Bulwahn wrote:
> > - a reference to STRICT_IOMEM in arch/x86/mm/init.c
> > unclear to me: which exact config this refers to
>
> Are you referring to the reference in this comment?
>
> > + /*
> > + * This must follow RAM test, since System RAM is considered a
> > + * restricted resource under CONFIG_STRICT_IOMEM.
> > + */
> > + if (iomem_is_exclusive(pagenr << PAGE_SHIFT)) {
> > + /* Low 1MB bypasses iomem restrictions. */
> > + if (pagenr < 256)
> > + return 1;
> ...
>
Yes, that is what I referred to.
> That came from here:
>
> > commit a4866aa812518ed1a37d8ea0c881dc946409de94
> > Author: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>
> > Date: Wed Apr 5 09:39:08 2017 -0700
> >
> > mm: Tighten x86 /dev/mem with zeroing reads
>
> Which also added this hunk:
>
> > #ifdef CONFIG_STRICT_DEVMEM
> > +static inline int page_is_allowed(unsigned long pfn)
> > +{
> > + return devmem_is_allowed(pfn);
> > +}
>
> and talks about CONFIG_STRICT_DEVMEM in the changelog:
>
> > mm: Tighten x86 /dev/mem with zeroing reads
> >
> > Under CONFIG_STRICT_DEVMEM, reading System RAM through /dev/mem is
> > disallowed. However, on x86, the first 1MB was always allowed for BIOS
> ...
>
> It's a pretty safe guess that STRICT_IOMEM refers to CONFIG_STRICT_DEVMEM.
Thanks, Dave.
If the maintainers consider updates to comments making them consistent
with the code as worth being picked, I will turn your analysis into a
proper commit message and provide a patch to update that comment.
Lukas
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-08-03 15:13 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-08-03 11:35 [PATCH 0/9] Kconfig symbol clean-up on ./arch/x86/ Lukas Bulwahn
2021-08-03 11:35 ` [PATCH 1/9] x86/entry: correct reference to intended CONFIG_64_BIT Lukas Bulwahn
2021-08-03 11:35 ` [PATCH 2/9] x86, olpc: correct condition to intended CONFIG_OLPC_XO15_SCI Lukas Bulwahn
2021-08-03 11:35 ` [PATCH 3/9] x86/Kconfig: correct reference to MWINCHIP3D Lukas Bulwahn
2021-08-03 11:35 ` [PATCH 4/9] x86/Kconfig: remove reference to obsolete MFD_INTEL_MSIC config Lukas Bulwahn
2021-08-03 11:35 ` [PATCH 5/9] x86/Kconfig: remove reference to obsolete APB_TIMER config Lukas Bulwahn
2021-10-05 19:57 ` Borislav Petkov
2021-08-03 11:35 ` [PATCH 6/9] x86/irq: fix slightly wrong reference in comment Lukas Bulwahn
2021-08-03 11:35 ` [PATCH 7/9] x86/uaccess: adjust comment for endif of CONFIG_CC_HAS_ASM_GOTO_OUTPUT Lukas Bulwahn
2021-08-03 11:35 ` [PATCH 8/9] x86: page_32.h: adjust comment for endif of CONFIG_X86_USE_3DNOW Lukas Bulwahn
2021-08-03 11:35 ` [PATCH 9/9] x86: ia32.h: adjust comment for endif of CONFIG_IA32_EMULATION Lukas Bulwahn
2021-10-05 19:59 ` Borislav Petkov
2021-08-03 14:32 ` [PATCH 0/9] Kconfig symbol clean-up on ./arch/x86/ Dave Hansen
2021-08-03 15:12 ` Lukas Bulwahn [this message]
2021-08-03 15:40 ` Dave Hansen
2021-12-22 13:00 ` Lukas Bulwahn
2021-08-03 21:49 ` Randy Dunlap
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to='CAKXUXMxQ83T7beOTuZ928=-eo2Tsr94TGxsaYh3+MHOJrDO8Bg@mail.gmail.com' \
--to=lukas.bulwahn@gmail.com \
--cc=andy@infradead.org \
--cc=bp@alien8.de \
--cc=dave.hansen@intel.com \
--cc=dvhart@infradead.org \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=keescook@chromium.org \
--cc=kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lee.jones@linaro.org \
--cc=linus.walleij@linaro.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lkundrak@v3.sk \
--cc=mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=pavel@ucw.cz \
--cc=platform-driver-x86@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com \
--cc=rdunlap@infradead.org \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).