From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 44324C05027 for ; Wed, 1 Feb 2023 19:35:52 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S230177AbjBATfv (ORCPT ); Wed, 1 Feb 2023 14:35:51 -0500 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:52370 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S229471AbjBATfv (ORCPT ); Wed, 1 Feb 2023 14:35:51 -0500 Received: from mga06.intel.com (mga06b.intel.com [134.134.136.31]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 309A17C736; Wed, 1 Feb 2023 11:35:50 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=intel.com; i=@intel.com; q=dns/txt; s=Intel; t=1675280150; x=1706816150; h=message-id:date:mime-version:subject:to:cc:references: from:in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding; bh=/Obl8rqfTGH6trUZEs37Lq7tRxm2qrcEOy/7J7nsiCE=; b=Zu2In3ZoEL4VyT8aqMTSXGE4kthLT8jWKWExC5FXFwQAlAjeygGbALgi ZZPvSXbonUPa8ysl+GQ4JLNCMzX8obrAYqghRNMgmYXtzu2VXybdkBlcc r7gmmqx/LiqDHa+daJUa315MmI59Gt8I/HimW67EOJz+COvP/bxZ863IZ jV5raNiiaxPSZFtPfeCrm/SAPbIzCqDlmYGTS1bJSXNMUjxz+SZo1enHU Tw8XJaIVrFmkWMJTiJJGhumhXQm8WXf/LKo+0kD+9zWjcDkxIDRycYFCw UHg6OQj2RKSsLefbLzRGJb75mSsPfzqKWlGP8OHRh43NI8nSvjnVVJxzD g==; X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6500,9779,10608"; a="390643899" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.97,265,1669104000"; d="scan'208";a="390643899" Received: from orsmga005.jf.intel.com ([10.7.209.41]) by orsmga104.jf.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 01 Feb 2023 11:35:49 -0800 X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6500,9779,10608"; a="838892059" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.97,265,1669104000"; d="scan'208";a="838892059" Received: from sgkhacha-mobl1.amr.corp.intel.com (HELO [10.212.227.86]) ([10.212.227.86]) by orsmga005-auth.jf.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 01 Feb 2023 11:35:48 -0800 Message-ID: Date: Wed, 1 Feb 2023 11:35:48 -0800 MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:102.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/102.6.1 Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/5] platform/x86/intel/ifs: Implement Array BIST test Content-Language: en-US To: Jithu Joseph , hdegoede@redhat.com, markgross@kernel.org Cc: tglx@linutronix.de, mingo@redhat.com, bp@alien8.de, dave.hansen@linux.intel.com, x86@kernel.org, hpa@zytor.com, gregkh@linuxfoundation.org, rostedt@goodmis.org, ashok.raj@intel.com, tony.luck@intel.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, platform-driver-x86@vger.kernel.org, patches@lists.linux.dev, ravi.v.shankar@intel.com, thiago.macieira@intel.com, athenas.jimenez.gonzalez@intel.com, sohil.mehta@intel.com References: <20230131234302.3997223-1-jithu.joseph@intel.com> <20230131234302.3997223-5-jithu.joseph@intel.com> From: Dave Hansen In-Reply-To: <20230131234302.3997223-5-jithu.joseph@intel.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: platform-driver-x86@vger.kernel.org On 1/31/23 15:43, Jithu Joseph wrote: > +union ifs_array { > + u64 data; > + struct { > + u32 array_bitmask :32; > + u32 array_bank :16; > + u32 rsvd :15; > + u32 ctrl_result :1; > + }; > +}; Why bother with a bitfield? Just do: union ifs_array { u64 data; struct { u32 array_bitmask; u16 array_bank; u16 flags; }; }; Then you only need to mask 'ctrl_result' out of flags. You don't need any crazy macros.