From: Mark Pearson <markpearson@lenovo.com>
To: Thomas Koch <linrunner@gmx.net>,
Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>,
Nicolo' Piazzalunga <nicolopiazzalunga@gmail.com>,
<platform-driver-x86@vger.kernel.org>,
Nitin Joshi1 <njoshi1@lenovo.com>,
Sebastian Reichel <sre@kernel.org>
Cc: <smclt30p@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [External] Re: [PATCH 1/3] thinkpad_acpi: add support for force_discharge
Date: Wed, 7 Apr 2021 13:48:00 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <b99aa7c2-0086-2f0b-f7b7-8ac7033b68d4@lenovo.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <6ead1585-9743-e56b-6552-564fabdd9930@gmx.net>
Hi Thomas, Hans and Nicolo
On 07/04/2021 08:19, Thomas Koch wrote:
> Hi Hans,
>
>> 1. These features are useful, but not super useful and as such I wonder
>> how often they are used and this how well tested the firmware is wrt
>> these.
>
>> I have added Mark and Nitin from Lenovo to the Cc. Mark, Nitin, can you
>> comment on if it is ok from a firmware pov to try and use the following
>> battery related ACPI methods on all thinkpads? :
>> #define GET_DISCHARGE "BDSG"
>> #define SET_DISCHARGE "BDSS"
>> #define GET_INHIBIT "PSSG"
>> #define SET_INHIBIT "BICS"
>
> These ACPI methods are present in (with very few exceptions) all
> ThinkPads released since 2012. I am curious to hear what Mark and Nitin
> have to say, never read anything official about it.
I'm afraid I've not come across these myself before, but will go and ask
the firmware team.
<For my internal reference LO-1115>
It would be good to confirm the implementation details if I can. I found
recently that some of the temperature sensors that are read in by
thinkpad_acpi from the EC RAM are not temp sensors (patch coming
soon....hopefully later today). Hopefully I can check the internal spec
and give a thumbs up on the implementation - even if we're not allowed
to share the actual paperwork (maybe one day....)
>
> Since 2012 there is also userspace tool tpacpi-bat [1] employing them
> along with those for the start/stop threshold.
>
> My own tool TLP makes use of tpacpi-bat for force_discharge also since
> 2012. From my experience in TLP support i can say there's a significant
> user base and those who use thresholds also want to use force_discharge
> for recalibration from time to time.
This probably isn't the right place for the discussion, but I've been
meaning to dig into battery management but never really get the time. I
know in the windows world that ThinkVantage has extra hooks for setting
thresholds and I wanted to see what we can do on the Linux side. If
there is anything that would be particularly helpful that is missing
please let me know.
Thanks
Mark
>
>
> The patches at hand work flawlessly on my small ThinkPad collection.
> [1] https://github.com/teleshoes/tpacpi-bat
>
>
>
> --
>
> Freundliche Grüße / Kind regards,
>
> Thomas Koch
>
>
>
> Mail : linrunner@gmx.net
>
> Web : https://linrunner.de/tlp
>
>
> On 07.04.21 12:24, Hans de Goede wrote:
>> Hi Nicola,
>>
>> Thank you for your patch series.
>>
>> I'm not sure what to do with these. I have a couple of concerns here:
>>
>> 1. These features are useful, but not super useful and as such I wonder
>> how often they are used and this how well tested the firmware is wrt
>> these.
>> I have added Mark and Nitin from Lenovo to the Cc. Mark, Nitin, can you
>> comment on if it is ok from a firmware pov to try and use the following
>> battery related ACPI methods on all thinkpads? :
>>
>> #define GET_DISCHARGE "BDSG"
>> #define SET_DISCHARGE "BDSS"
>> #define GET_INHIBIT "PSSG"
>> #define SET_INHIBIT "BICS"
>>
>>
>> 2. If we add support for this to the kernel we should probably
>> first agree on standardized power-supply class property names for
>> these, rather then coming up with our own names. ATM we register
>> 2 names for the charge start threshold, the one which the thinkpad_acpi
>> code invented and the standardized name which was later added.
>>
>> I've added Sebastian, the power-supply class / driver maintainer to
>> the Cc. for this. Sebastian Nicolo wants to add support for 2 new
>> features as power-supply properties:
>>
>> --- a/Documentation/admin-guide/laptops/thinkpad-acpi.rst
>> +++ b/Documentation/admin-guide/laptops/thinkpad-acpi.rst
>> ...
>> +Battery forced discharging
>> +--------------------------
>> +
>> +sysfs attribute:
>> +/sys/class/power_supply/BATx/force_discharge
>> +
>> +Setting this attribute to 1 forces the battery to discharge while AC
>> is attached.
>> +Setting it to 0 terminates forced discharging.
>> +
>> +Battery charge inhibiting
>> +--------------------------
>> +
>> +sysfs attribute:
>> +/sys/class/power_supply/BATx/inhibit_discharge
>> +
>> +Setting this attribute to 1 stops charging of the battery as a manual
>> override
>> +over the threshold attributes. Setting it to 0 terminates the override.
>>
>> Sebastian, I believe that this should be changes to instead be documented
>> in: Documentation/ABI/testing/sysfs-class-power
>> and besides the rename I was wondering if you have any remarks on the
>> proposed
>> API before Nicolo sends out a v2 ?
>>
>> Regards,
>>
>> Hans
>>
>>
>> On 3/17/21 3:01 PM, Nicolo' Piazzalunga wrote:
>>> Lenovo ThinkPad systems have a feature that lets you
>>> force the battery to discharge when AC is attached.
>>>
>>> This patch implements that feature and exposes it via the generic
>>> ACPI battery driver in the generic location:
>>>
>>> /sys/class/power_supply/BATx/force_discharge
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Ognjen Galic <smclt30p@gmail.com>
>>> Signed-off-by: Thomas Koch <linrunner@gmx.net>
>>> Signed-off-by: Nicolo' Piazzalunga <nicolopiazzalunga@gmail.com>
>>> ---
>>> drivers/platform/x86/thinkpad_acpi.c | 59 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++--
>>> 1 file changed, 55 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/drivers/platform/x86/thinkpad_acpi.c
>>> b/drivers/platform/x86/thinkpad_acpi.c
>>> index 9c4df41687a3..6c7dca3a10d2 100644
>>> --- a/drivers/platform/x86/thinkpad_acpi.c
>>> +++ b/drivers/platform/x86/thinkpad_acpi.c
>>> @@ -9317,6 +9317,8 @@ static struct ibm_struct mute_led_driver_data = {
>>> #define SET_START "BCCS"
>>> #define GET_STOP "BCSG"
>>> #define SET_STOP "BCSS"
>>> +#define GET_DISCHARGE "BDSG"
>>> +#define SET_DISCHARGE "BDSS"
>>>
>>> enum {
>>> BAT_ANY = 0,
>>> @@ -9333,6 +9335,7 @@ enum {
>>> /* This is used in the get/set helpers */
>>> THRESHOLD_START,
>>> THRESHOLD_STOP,
>>> + FORCE_DISCHARGE
>>> };
>>>
>>> struct tpacpi_battery_data {
>>> @@ -9340,6 +9343,7 @@ struct tpacpi_battery_data {
>>> int start_support;
>>> int charge_stop;
>>> int stop_support;
>>> + int discharge_support;
>>> };
>>>
>>> struct tpacpi_battery_driver_data {
>>> @@ -9397,6 +9401,12 @@ static int tpacpi_battery_get(int what, int
>>> battery, int *ret)
>>> if (*ret == 0)
>>> *ret = 100;
>>> return 0;
>>> + case FORCE_DISCHARGE:
>>> + if ACPI_FAILURE(tpacpi_battery_acpi_eval(GET_DISCHARGE, ret,
>>> battery))
>>> + return -ENODEV;
>>> + /* The force discharge status is in bit 0 */
>>> + *ret = *ret & 0x01;
>>> + return 0;
>>> default:
>>> pr_crit("wrong parameter: %d", what);
>>> return -EINVAL;
>>> @@ -9425,6 +9435,16 @@ static int tpacpi_battery_set(int what, int
>>> battery, int value)
>>> return -ENODEV;
>>> }
>>> return 0;
>>> + case FORCE_DISCHARGE:
>>> + /* Force discharge is in bit 0,
>>> + * break on AC attach is in bit 1 (won't work on some
>>> ThinkPads),
>>> + * battery ID is in bits 8-9, 2 bits.
>>> + */
>>> + if ACPI_FAILURE(tpacpi_battery_acpi_eval(SET_DISCHARGE,
>>> &ret, param)) {
>>> + pr_err("failed to set force dischrage on %d", battery);
>>> + return -ENODEV;
>>> + }
>>> + return 0;
>>> default:
>>> pr_crit("wrong parameter: %d", what);
>>> return -EINVAL;
>>> @@ -9443,6 +9463,8 @@ static int tpacpi_battery_probe(int battery)
>>> * 2) Check for support
>>> * 3) Get the current stop threshold
>>> * 4) Check for support
>>> + * 5) Get the current force discharge status
>>> + * 6) Check for support
>>> */
>>> if (acpi_has_method(hkey_handle, GET_START)) {
>>> if ACPI_FAILURE(tpacpi_battery_acpi_eval(GET_START, &ret,
>>> battery)) {
>>> @@ -9479,11 +9501,16 @@ static int tpacpi_battery_probe(int battery)
>>> return -ENODEV;
>>> }
>>> }
>>> - pr_info("battery %d registered (start %d, stop %d)",
>>> + if (acpi_has_method(hkey_handle, GET_DISCHARGE))
>>> + if (!ACPI_FAILURE(tpacpi_battery_acpi_eval(GET_DISCHARGE,
>>> &ret, battery)))
>>> + /* Support is marked in bit 8 */
>>> + battery_info.batteries[battery].discharge_support = ret
>>> & BIT(8);
>>> +
>>> + pr_info("battery %d registered (start %d, stop %d, force: %d)",
>>> battery,
>>> battery_info.batteries[battery].charge_start,
>>> - battery_info.batteries[battery].charge_stop);
>>> -
>>> + battery_info.batteries[battery].charge_stop,
>>> + battery_info.batteries[battery].discharge_support);
>>> return 0;
>>> }
>>>
>>> @@ -9569,6 +9596,15 @@ static ssize_t tpacpi_battery_store(int what,
>>> if (tpacpi_battery_set(THRESHOLD_STOP, battery, value))
>>> return -EINVAL;
>>> return count;
>>> + case FORCE_DISCHARGE:
>>> + if (!battery_info.batteries[battery].discharge_support)
>>> + return -ENODEV;
>>> + /* The only valid values are 1 and 0 */
>>> + if (value != 0 && value != 1)
>>> + return -EINVAL;
>>> + if (tpacpi_battery_set(FORCE_DISCHARGE, battery, value))
>>> + return -ENODEV;
>>> + return count;
>>> default:
>>> pr_crit("Wrong parameter: %d", what);
>>> return -EINVAL;
>>> @@ -9617,6 +9653,13 @@ static ssize_t
>>> charge_control_end_threshold_show(struct device *device,
>>> return tpacpi_battery_show(THRESHOLD_STOP, device, buf);
>>> }
>>>
>>> +static ssize_t force_discharge_show(struct device *device,
>>> + struct device_attribute *attr,
>>> + char *buf)
>>> +{
>>> + return tpacpi_battery_show(FORCE_DISCHARGE, device, buf);
>>> +}
>>> +
>>> static ssize_t charge_control_start_threshold_store(struct device
>>> *dev,
>>> struct device_attribute *attr,
>>> const char *buf, size_t count)
>>> @@ -9631,8 +9674,16 @@ static ssize_t
>>> charge_control_end_threshold_store(struct device *dev,
>>> return tpacpi_battery_store(THRESHOLD_STOP, dev, buf, count);
>>> }
>>>
>>> +static ssize_t force_discharge_store(struct device *dev,
>>> + struct device_attribute *attr,
>>> + const char *buf, size_t count)
>>> +{
>>> + return tpacpi_battery_store(FORCE_DISCHARGE, dev, buf, count);
>>> +}
>>> +
>>> static DEVICE_ATTR_RW(charge_control_start_threshold);
>>> static DEVICE_ATTR_RW(charge_control_end_threshold);
>>> +static DEVICE_ATTR_RW(force_discharge);
>>> static struct device_attribute dev_attr_charge_start_threshold =
>>> __ATTR(
>>> charge_start_threshold,
>>> 0644,
>>> @@ -9645,12 +9696,12 @@ static struct device_attribute
>>> dev_attr_charge_stop_threshold = __ATTR(
>>> charge_control_end_threshold_show,
>>> charge_control_end_threshold_store
>>> );
>>> -
>>> static struct attribute *tpacpi_battery_attrs[] = {
>>> &dev_attr_charge_control_start_threshold.attr,
>>> &dev_attr_charge_control_end_threshold.attr,
>>> &dev_attr_charge_start_threshold.attr,
>>> &dev_attr_charge_stop_threshold.attr,
>>> + &dev_attr_force_discharge.attr,
>>> NULL,
>>> };
>>>
>>>
>>
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-04-07 17:48 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-03-17 14:01 [PATCH 1/3] thinkpad_acpi: add support for force_discharge Nicolo' Piazzalunga
2021-04-07 10:24 ` Hans de Goede
2021-04-07 10:33 ` Barnabás Pőcze
2021-04-08 13:51 ` Sebastian Reichel
2021-04-08 18:18 ` Thomas Koch
2021-04-09 18:33 ` Thomas Koch
2021-04-13 8:05 ` Hans de Goede
2021-04-17 11:49 ` Thomas Koch
2021-04-17 17:03 ` Hans de Goede
2021-05-19 14:45 ` Nicolo' Piazzalunga
2021-04-07 12:19 ` Thomas Koch
2021-04-07 17:48 ` Mark Pearson [this message]
[not found] ` <VI1PR09MB2302B7C3AD8014CC98D36AA595759@VI1PR09MB2302.eurprd09.prod.outlook.com>
2021-04-12 17:10 ` [External] " Mark Pearson
2021-09-27 13:59 ` Mark Pearson
2021-09-27 15:00 ` Nicolò Piazzalunga
2021-09-27 15:12 ` Hans de Goede
2021-09-27 16:50 ` [External] " Mark Pearson
2021-09-29 5:47 ` Thomas Koch
2021-09-29 9:55 ` Hans de Goede
2021-09-29 10:45 ` Thomas Koch
2021-09-29 10:56 ` Hans de Goede
2021-09-29 13:45 ` [External] " Mark Pearson
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=b99aa7c2-0086-2f0b-f7b7-8ac7033b68d4@lenovo.com \
--to=markpearson@lenovo.com \
--cc=hdegoede@redhat.com \
--cc=linrunner@gmx.net \
--cc=nicolopiazzalunga@gmail.com \
--cc=njoshi1@lenovo.com \
--cc=platform-driver-x86@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=smclt30p@gmail.com \
--cc=sre@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).