From: Max Reitz <mreitz@redhat.com>
To: Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy <vsementsov@virtuozzo.com>,
qemu-block@nongnu.org
Cc: kwolf@redhat.com, qemu-devel@nongnu.org
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] block: fix permission update in bdrv_replace_node
Date: Mon, 26 Aug 2019 13:21:55 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <01661ed8-9bf5-4d1e-5637-2669d4df23a3@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190824100740.61635-1-vsementsov@virtuozzo.com>
[-- Attachment #1.1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1016 bytes --]
On 24.08.19 12:07, Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy wrote:
> It's wrong to OR shared permissions. It may lead to crash on further
> permission updates.
> Also, no needs to consider previously calculated permissions, as at
> this point we already bind all new parents and bdrv_get_cumulative_perm
> result is enough. So fix the bug by just set permissions by
> bdrv_get_cumulative_perm result.
>
> Bug was introduced in long ago 234ac1a9025, in 2.9.
>
> Signed-off-by: Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy <vsementsov@virtuozzo.com>
> ---
>
> Hi all!
>
> I found this bug during my work around backup-top filter. It happens that
> on filter removing, bdrv_replace_node() breaks permissions in graph which
> lead to bdrv_set_backing_hd(new backing: NULL) on
> assert(tighten_restrictions == false).
>
> block.c | 5 ++---
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
Thanks, that makes sense.
Applied to my block branch:
https://git.xanclic.moe/XanClic/qemu/commits/branch/block
Max
[-- Attachment #2: OpenPGP digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 488 bytes --]
prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-08-26 11:23 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-08-24 10:07 [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] block: fix permission update in bdrv_replace_node Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy
2019-08-26 11:21 ` Max Reitz [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=01661ed8-9bf5-4d1e-5637-2669d4df23a3@redhat.com \
--to=mreitz@redhat.com \
--cc=kwolf@redhat.com \
--cc=qemu-block@nongnu.org \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
--cc=vsementsov@virtuozzo.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).