qemu-devel.nongnu.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Dov Murik <dovmurik@linux.ibm.com>
To: Brijesh Singh <brijesh.singh@amd.com>, qemu-devel@nongnu.org
Cc: "Tom Lendacky" <thomas.lendacky@amd.com>,
	"Daniel P. Berrangé" <berrange@redhat.com>,
	"Eduardo Habkost" <ehabkost@redhat.com>,
	kvm@vger.kernel.org, "Michael S . Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>,
	"Connor Kuehl" <ckuehl@redhat.com>,
	"Michael Roth" <michael.roth@amd.com>,
	"James Bottomley" <jejb@linux.ibm.com>,
	"Dr . David Alan Gilbert" <dgilbert@redhat.com>,
	"Dov Murik" <dovmurik@linux.ibm.com>,
	"Paolo Bonzini" <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
	"Philippe Mathieu-Daudé" <philmd@redhat.com>,
	"David Gibson" <david@gibson.dropbear.id.au>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 5/6] i386/sev: add support to encrypt BIOS when SEV-SNP is enabled
Date: Mon, 19 Jul 2021 16:00:55 +0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <0ab7b398-238e-38c5-aed1-fd39fd9c7f7c@linux.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210709215550.32496-6-brijesh.singh@amd.com>



On 10/07/2021 0:55, Brijesh Singh wrote:
> The KVM_SEV_SNP_LAUNCH_UPDATE command is used for encrypting the bios
> image used for booting the SEV-SNP guest.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Brijesh Singh <brijesh.singh@amd.com>
> ---
>  target/i386/sev.c        | 33 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
>  target/i386/trace-events |  1 +
>  2 files changed, 33 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/target/i386/sev.c b/target/i386/sev.c
> index 259408a8f1..41dcb084d1 100644
> --- a/target/i386/sev.c
> +++ b/target/i386/sev.c
> @@ -883,6 +883,30 @@ out:
>      return ret;
>  }
>  
> +static int
> +sev_snp_launch_update(SevGuestState *sev, uint8_t *addr, uint64_t len, int type)

This seems similar to the SEV LAUNCH_UPDATE_DATA API (with the added
`type` argument).  In SEV API these are the limitations (from the SEV
API document):

* PADDR - System physical address of the data to be encrypted.
          Must be 16 B aligned.
* LENGTH - Length of the data to be encrypted.
           Must be a multiple of 16 B.

But in SNP_LAUNCH_UPDATE it is my understanding that addr must be page
aligned (4KB) and length must be in whole pages (because the underlying
types are PAGE_TYPE_NORMAL, PAGE_TYPE_ZERO, ...).

So what happens if we call sev_encrypt_flash with a non-page-aligned
addr / length?

Or maybe I misunderstood the SNP ABI document?

-Dov



> +{
> +    int ret, fw_error;
> +    struct kvm_sev_snp_launch_update update = {};
> +
> +    if (!addr || !len) {
> +        return 1;
> +    }
> +
> +    update.uaddr = (__u64)(unsigned long)addr;
> +    update.len = len;
> +    update.page_type = type;
> +    trace_kvm_sev_snp_launch_update(addr, len, type);
> +    ret = sev_ioctl(sev->sev_fd, KVM_SEV_SNP_LAUNCH_UPDATE,
> +                    &update, &fw_error);
> +    if (ret) {
> +        error_report("%s: SNP_LAUNCH_UPDATE ret=%d fw_error=%d '%s'",
> +                __func__, ret, fw_error, fw_error_to_str(fw_error));
> +    }
> +
> +    return ret;
> +}
> +
>  static int
>  sev_launch_update_data(SevGuestState *sev, uint8_t *addr, uint64_t len)
>  {
> @@ -1161,7 +1185,14 @@ sev_encrypt_flash(uint8_t *ptr, uint64_t len, Error **errp)
>  
>      /* if SEV is in update state then encrypt the data else do nothing */
>      if (sev_check_state(sev_guest, SEV_STATE_LAUNCH_UPDATE)) {
> -        int ret = sev_launch_update_data(sev_guest, ptr, len);
> +        int ret;
> +
> +        if (sev_snp_enabled()) {
> +            ret = sev_snp_launch_update(sev_guest, ptr, len,
> +                                        KVM_SEV_SNP_PAGE_TYPE_NORMAL);
> +        } else {
> +            ret = sev_launch_update_data(sev_guest, ptr, len);
> +        }
>          if (ret < 0) {
>              error_setg(errp, "failed to encrypt pflash rom");
>              return ret;
> diff --git a/target/i386/trace-events b/target/i386/trace-events
> index 18cc14b956..0c2d250206 100644
> --- a/target/i386/trace-events
> +++ b/target/i386/trace-events
> @@ -12,3 +12,4 @@ kvm_sev_launch_finish(void) ""
>  kvm_sev_launch_secret(uint64_t hpa, uint64_t hva, uint64_t secret, int len) "hpa 0x%" PRIx64 " hva 0x%" PRIx64 " data 0x%" PRIx64 " len %d"
>  kvm_sev_attestation_report(const char *mnonce, const char *data) "mnonce %s data %s"
>  kvm_sev_snp_launch_start(uint64_t policy) "policy 0x%" PRIx64
> +kvm_sev_snp_launch_update(void *addr, uint64_t len, int type) "addr %p len 0x%" PRIx64 " type %d"
> 


  parent reply	other threads:[~2021-07-19 13:05 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 45+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-07-09 21:55 [RFC PATCH 0/6] Add AMD Secure Nested Paging (SEV-SNP) support Brijesh Singh
2021-07-09 21:55 ` [RFC PATCH 1/6] linux-header: add the SNP specific command Brijesh Singh
2021-07-10 20:32   ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2021-07-12 15:48     ` Brijesh Singh
2021-07-19 11:35   ` Dov Murik
2021-07-19 14:40     ` Brijesh Singh
2021-07-09 21:55 ` [RFC PATCH 2/6] i386/sev: extend sev-guest property to include SEV-SNP Brijesh Singh
2021-07-12  6:09   ` Dov Murik
2021-07-12 14:34   ` Dr. David Alan Gilbert
2021-07-12 15:59     ` Brijesh Singh
2021-07-12 16:16       ` Dr. David Alan Gilbert
2021-07-12 14:43   ` Daniel P. Berrangé
2021-07-12 15:56     ` Brijesh Singh
2021-07-12 16:24       ` Daniel P. Berrangé
2021-07-13 13:54         ` Brijesh Singh
2021-07-13 13:46   ` Markus Armbruster
2021-07-14 14:18     ` Brijesh Singh
2021-07-20 19:42     ` Michael Roth
2021-07-20 21:54       ` Daniel P. Berrangé
2021-07-21 13:08         ` Markus Armbruster
2021-07-22  0:02           ` Michael Roth via
2021-07-13 18:21   ` Eric Blake
2021-07-09 21:55 ` [RFC PATCH 3/6] i386/sev: initialize SNP context Brijesh Singh
2021-07-15  9:32   ` Dov Murik
2021-07-15 13:24     ` Brijesh Singh
2021-07-09 21:55 ` [RFC PATCH 4/6] i386/sev: add the SNP launch start context Brijesh Singh
2021-07-19 12:34   ` Dov Murik
2021-07-19 15:27     ` Brijesh Singh
2021-07-09 21:55 ` [RFC PATCH 5/6] i386/sev: add support to encrypt BIOS when SEV-SNP is enabled Brijesh Singh
2021-07-14 17:08   ` Connor Kuehl
2021-07-14 18:52     ` Brijesh Singh
2021-07-15  5:54       ` Dov Murik
2021-07-19 13:00   ` Dov Murik [this message]
2021-07-09 21:55 ` [RFC PATCH 6/6] i386/sev: populate secrets and cpuid page and finalize the SNP launch Brijesh Singh
2021-07-14 17:29   ` Dr. David Alan Gilbert
2021-07-14 18:53     ` Brijesh Singh
2021-07-19 11:24   ` Dov Murik
2021-07-19 14:45     ` Brijesh Singh
2021-07-12 17:00 ` [RFC PATCH 0/6] Add AMD Secure Nested Paging (SEV-SNP) support Tom Lendacky
2021-07-13  8:05 ` Dov Murik
2021-07-13  8:31   ` Dr. David Alan Gilbert
2021-07-13 13:57     ` Brijesh Singh
2021-07-13 14:01   ` Brijesh Singh
2021-07-14  9:52     ` Dr. David Alan Gilbert
2021-07-14 14:23       ` Brijesh Singh

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=0ab7b398-238e-38c5-aed1-fd39fd9c7f7c@linux.ibm.com \
    --to=dovmurik@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=berrange@redhat.com \
    --cc=brijesh.singh@amd.com \
    --cc=ckuehl@redhat.com \
    --cc=david@gibson.dropbear.id.au \
    --cc=dgilbert@redhat.com \
    --cc=ehabkost@redhat.com \
    --cc=jejb@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=michael.roth@amd.com \
    --cc=mst@redhat.com \
    --cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
    --cc=philmd@redhat.com \
    --cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
    --cc=thomas.lendacky@amd.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).