qemu-devel.nongnu.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Max Reitz <mreitz@redhat.com>
To: Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy <vsementsov@virtuozzo.com>,
	"qemu-block@nongnu.org" <qemu-block@nongnu.org>
Cc: "kwolf@redhat.com" <kwolf@redhat.com>,
	"jsnow@redhat.com" <jsnow@redhat.com>,
	"qemu-devel@nongnu.org" <qemu-devel@nongnu.org>,
	Denis Lunev <den@virtuozzo.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 04/10] hbitmap: drop meta bitmaps as they are unused
Date: Mon, 20 Jan 2020 18:05:46 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <0cf94b1f-e7cb-081a-34ab-63a7d9ba80ce@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <e6d654fb-7c04-c709-6b2a-3801ae1008d6@virtuozzo.com>


[-- Attachment #1.1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1492 bytes --]

On 20.01.20 17:20, Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy wrote:
> 20.01.2020 14:13, Max Reitz wrote:
>> On 19.12.19 11:03, Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy wrote:
>>> Signed-off-by: Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy <vsementsov@virtuozzo.com>
>>> ---
>>>   include/qemu/hbitmap.h |  21 --------
>>>   tests/test-hbitmap.c   | 115 -----------------------------------------
>>>   util/hbitmap.c         |  16 ------
>>>   3 files changed, 152 deletions(-)
>>
>> Er, hrm, well.
>>
>> Reviewed-by: Max Reitz <mreitz@redhat.com>
>>
>> git log me the only commits that touched anything to the regard of
>> '*create_meta*' were the ones that introduced it and your commit that
>> dropped it.
>>
>> Soo, er, well, okay.  Why did we introduce these again?  (I suppose I
>> should know since they have my S-o-b on them.  But I actually don’t.)
>>
>> Max
>>
> 
> I'm a bit not follow what you mean. I can just note, that dirty-bitmap.c
> part of meta bitmaps was recently removed, and hbitmap.c part I forgot to
> remove...

Yes, but who used that dirty-bitmap.c interface?  As far as I can tell,
nobody.

> Meta bitmaps were intended to control live migration of bitmaps and to
> implement something like partial sync of bitmaps (write to qcow2 only
> changed part of bitmap), but migration implemented in other way
> (postcopy) and the second thing was not implemented.

OK.  I was wondering why they were implemented without ever having been
used (as far as I can tell).

Max


[-- Attachment #2: OpenPGP digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 488 bytes --]

  reply	other threads:[~2020-01-20 17:11 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 39+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-12-19 10:03 [PATCH v3 00/10] Further bitmaps improvements Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy
2019-12-19 10:03 ` [PATCH v3 01/10] hbitmap: assert that we don't create bitmap larger than INT64_MAX Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy
2020-01-20 10:51   ` Max Reitz
2019-12-19 10:03 ` [PATCH v3 02/10] hbitmap: move hbitmap_iter_next_word to hbitmap.c Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy
2020-01-20 10:55   ` Max Reitz
2020-01-20 16:14     ` Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy
2019-12-19 10:03 ` [PATCH v3 03/10] hbitmap: unpublish hbitmap_iter_skip_words Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy
2020-01-20 10:59   ` Max Reitz
2019-12-19 10:03 ` [PATCH v3 04/10] hbitmap: drop meta bitmaps as they are unused Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy
2020-01-20 11:13   ` Max Reitz
2020-01-20 16:20     ` Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy
2020-01-20 17:05       ` Max Reitz [this message]
2020-01-20 17:28         ` Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy
2020-01-20 19:53           ` Eric Blake
2020-01-21  9:15             ` Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy
2019-12-19 10:03 ` [PATCH v3 05/10] block/dirty-bitmap: switch _next_dirty_area and _next_zero to int64_t Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy
2020-01-20 11:59   ` Max Reitz
2020-01-20 12:28     ` Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy
2020-01-20 12:53       ` Max Reitz
2020-01-20 19:56       ` Eric Blake
2019-12-19 10:03 ` [PATCH v3 06/10] block/dirty-bitmap: add _next_dirty API Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy
2020-01-20 13:14   ` Max Reitz
2020-01-20 16:30     ` Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy
2020-01-21  9:35       ` Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy
2019-12-19 10:03 ` [PATCH v3 07/10] block/dirty-bitmap: improve _next_dirty_area API Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy
2020-01-20 13:58   ` Max Reitz
2020-01-20 16:26     ` Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy
2019-12-19 10:03 ` [PATCH v3 08/10] nbd/server: introduce NBDExtentArray Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy
2020-01-20 20:20   ` Eric Blake
2020-01-21 10:25     ` Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy
2019-12-19 10:03 ` [PATCH v3 09/10] nbd/server: use bdrv_dirty_bitmap_next_dirty_area Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy
2020-01-20 20:23   ` Eric Blake
2019-12-19 10:03 ` [PATCH v3 10/10] block/qcow2-bitmap: use bdrv_dirty_bitmap_next_dirty Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy
2020-01-20 14:18   ` Max Reitz
2020-01-20 16:05     ` Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy
2020-01-20  9:08 ` [PATCH v3 00/10] Further bitmaps improvements Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy
2020-01-20 14:20 ` Max Reitz
2020-01-20 16:33   ` Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy
2020-01-20 20:25     ` Eric Blake

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=0cf94b1f-e7cb-081a-34ab-63a7d9ba80ce@redhat.com \
    --to=mreitz@redhat.com \
    --cc=den@virtuozzo.com \
    --cc=jsnow@redhat.com \
    --cc=kwolf@redhat.com \
    --cc=qemu-block@nongnu.org \
    --cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
    --cc=vsementsov@virtuozzo.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).