qemu-devel.nongnu.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org
Cc: stefanha@redhat.com
Subject: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 02/16] aio: do not really acquire/release the main AIO context
Date: Tue,  9 Feb 2016 12:46:00 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1455018374-4706-3-git-send-email-pbonzini@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1455018374-4706-1-git-send-email-pbonzini@redhat.com>

The main AIO context is used in many places that are not aware
of AioContexts at all.  bdrv_drain will soon do a release/acquire
itself, which for the main AIO context would break because code
calls bdrv_drain on it without acquiring anything.

Very soon, bdrv will be ready for removal of aio_context_acquire
from non-block-layer code.  The idea is that the AioContext will be
acquired by bdrv_*, and no one will care of what's running in the
main I/O thread or in the dataplane thread.  Even if there are two
concurrent instances of the I/O thread, locks protect the data
structures; this evolves naturally to the multiqueue case where
there are multiple I/O threads touching the same BlockDriverState.

When this happens, aio_context_acquire/release can go away, replaced
by fine-grained locks, and this hack will also go away with it.

Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
---
 async.c | 12 ++++++++++--
 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/async.c b/async.c
index d4dd2cc..d083564 100644
--- a/async.c
+++ b/async.c
@@ -369,10 +369,18 @@ void aio_context_unref(AioContext *ctx)
 
 void aio_context_acquire(AioContext *ctx)
 {
-    rfifolock_lock(&ctx->lock);
+    if (ctx == qemu_get_aio_context()) {
+        assert(qemu_mutex_iothread_locked());
+    } else {
+        rfifolock_lock(&ctx->lock);
+    }
 }
 
 void aio_context_release(AioContext *ctx)
 {
-    rfifolock_unlock(&ctx->lock);
+    if (ctx == qemu_get_aio_context()) {
+        assert(qemu_mutex_iothread_locked());
+    } else {
+        rfifolock_unlock(&ctx->lock);
+    }
 }
-- 
2.5.0

  parent reply	other threads:[~2016-02-09 11:46 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-02-09 11:45 [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v3 00/16] aio: first part of aio_context_acquire/release pushdown Paolo Bonzini
2016-02-09 11:45 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 01/16] aio: introduce aio_context_in_iothread Paolo Bonzini
2016-02-09 11:46 ` Paolo Bonzini [this message]
2016-02-09 11:46 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 03/16] aio: introduce aio_poll_internal Paolo Bonzini
2016-02-09 11:46 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 04/16] aio: only call aio_poll_internal from iothread Paolo Bonzini
2016-02-09 11:46 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 05/16] iothread: release AioContext around aio_poll Paolo Bonzini
2016-02-09 11:46 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 06/16] qemu-thread: introduce QemuRecMutex Paolo Bonzini
2016-02-09 11:46 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 07/16] aio: convert from RFifoLock to QemuRecMutex Paolo Bonzini
2016-02-09 11:46 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 08/16] aio: rename bh_lock to list_lock Paolo Bonzini
2016-02-09 11:46 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 09/16] qemu-thread: introduce QemuLockCnt Paolo Bonzini
2016-02-09 11:46 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 10/16] aio: make ctx->list_lock a QemuLockCnt, subsuming ctx->walking_bh Paolo Bonzini
2016-02-09 11:46 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 11/16] qemu-thread: optimize QemuLockCnt with futexes on Linux Paolo Bonzini
2016-02-09 11:46 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 12/16] aio: tweak walking in dispatch phase Paolo Bonzini
2016-02-09 11:46 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 13/16] aio-posix: remove walking_handlers, protecting AioHandler list with list_lock Paolo Bonzini
2016-02-09 11:46 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 14/16] aio-win32: " Paolo Bonzini
2016-02-09 11:46 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 15/16] aio: document locking Paolo Bonzini
2016-02-09 11:46 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 16/16] aio: push aio_context_acquire/release down to dispatching Paolo Bonzini
2016-02-09 14:01 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v3 00/16] aio: first part of aio_context_acquire/release pushdown Stefan Hajnoczi
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2016-02-08 16:14 [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2 " Paolo Bonzini
2016-02-08 16:14 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 02/16] aio: do not really acquire/release the main AIO context Paolo Bonzini
2016-01-15 15:12 [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 00/16] aio: first part of aio_context_acquire/release pushdown Paolo Bonzini
2016-01-15 15:12 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 02/16] aio: do not really acquire/release the main AIO context Paolo Bonzini

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1455018374-4706-3-git-send-email-pbonzini@redhat.com \
    --to=pbonzini@redhat.com \
    --cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
    --cc=stefanha@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).