From: Daniel Henrique Barboza <danielhb413@gmail.com>
To: "qemu-devel@nongnu.org" <qemu-devel@nongnu.org>,
"qemu-ppc@nongnu.org" <qemu-ppc@nongnu.org>
Cc: michael.roth@amd.com, Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com>,
David Gibson <david@gibson.dropbear.id.au>
Subject: [RFC] adding a generic QAPI event for failed device hotunplug
Date: Fri, 5 Mar 2021 15:16:10 -0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <155911cc-8764-1a65-4bb3-2fc0628d52e5@gmail.com> (raw)
Hi,
Recent changes in pseries code (not yet pushed, available at David's
ppc-for-6.0) are using the QAPI event MEM_UNPLUG_ERROR to report memory
hotunplug errors in the pseries machine.
The pseries machine is also using a timeout to cancel CPU hotunplugs that
takes too long to finish (in which we're assuming a guest side error) and
it would be desirable to also send a QAPI event for this case as well.
At this moment, there is no "CPU_UNPLUG_ERROR" in QAPI (guess ACPI doesn't
need it). Before sending patches to implement this new event I had a talk
with David Gibson and he suggested that, instead of adding a new CPU_UNPLUG_ERROR
event, we could add a generic event (e.g. DEVICE_UNPLUG_ERROR) that can be
used by the pseries machine in both error scenarios (MEM and CPU).
This could also be used by x86 as well, although I believe the use of
MEM_UNPLUG_ERROR would need to be kept for awhile to avoid breaking ABI.
Any suggestions/comments?
Thanks,
DHB
next reply other threads:[~2021-03-05 18:51 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-03-05 18:16 Daniel Henrique Barboza [this message]
2021-03-06 6:57 ` [RFC] adding a generic QAPI event for failed device hotunplug Markus Armbruster
2021-03-08 14:22 ` Daniel Henrique Barboza
2021-03-08 17:04 ` Markus Armbruster
2021-03-08 18:01 ` Daniel Henrique Barboza
2021-03-09 3:22 ` David Gibson
2021-03-09 6:22 ` Markus Armbruster
2021-03-11 20:50 ` Daniel Henrique Barboza
2021-03-12 1:19 ` David Gibson
2021-03-12 8:12 ` Markus Armbruster
2021-03-19 7:55 ` Markus Armbruster
2021-03-22 6:39 ` David Gibson
2021-03-22 12:06 ` Paolo Bonzini
2021-03-23 3:33 ` David Gibson
2021-03-23 13:06 ` Igor Mammedov
2021-03-29 5:35 ` David Gibson
2021-03-29 9:38 ` Paolo Bonzini
2021-03-12 13:38 ` Laine Stump
2021-03-22 6:43 ` David Gibson
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=155911cc-8764-1a65-4bb3-2fc0628d52e5@gmail.com \
--to=danielhb413@gmail.com \
--cc=armbru@redhat.com \
--cc=david@gibson.dropbear.id.au \
--cc=michael.roth@amd.com \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
--cc=qemu-ppc@nongnu.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).