From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.8 required=3.0 tests=HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 55A90C3A5A0 for ; Mon, 19 Aug 2019 18:11:35 +0000 (UTC) Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 306B62087E for ; Mon, 19 Aug 2019 18:11:35 +0000 (UTC) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 306B62087E Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=bugs.launchpad.net Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=qemu-devel-bounces+qemu-devel=archiver.kernel.org@nongnu.org Received: from localhost ([::1]:56024 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1hzm7y-0004Tb-EJ for qemu-devel@archiver.kernel.org; Mon, 19 Aug 2019 14:11:34 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:54869) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1hzm7E-0003ei-P3 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 19 Aug 2019 14:10:49 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1hzm7D-0004NY-Gm for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 19 Aug 2019 14:10:48 -0400 Received: from indium.canonical.com ([91.189.90.7]:52130) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1hzm7D-0004NC-BD for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 19 Aug 2019 14:10:47 -0400 Received: from loganberry.canonical.com ([91.189.90.37]) by indium.canonical.com with esmtp (Exim 4.86_2 #2 (Debian)) id 1hzm7B-0004nT-U9 for ; Mon, 19 Aug 2019 18:10:45 +0000 Received: from loganberry.canonical.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by loganberry.canonical.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DE8E32E80CC for ; Mon, 19 Aug 2019 18:10:45 +0000 (UTC) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Date: Mon, 19 Aug 2019 17:55:50 -0000 From: =?utf-8?q?Philippe_Mathieu-Daud=C3=A9?= <1819289@bugs.launchpad.net> To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org X-Launchpad-Notification-Type: bug X-Launchpad-Bug: product=qemu; status=New; importance=Undecided; assignee=None; X-Launchpad-Bug-Information-Type: Public X-Launchpad-Bug-Private: no X-Launchpad-Bug-Security-Vulnerability: no X-Launchpad-Bug-Commenters: cbparker curryrice71 philmd X-Launchpad-Bug-Reporter: John M (curryrice71) X-Launchpad-Bug-Modifier: =?utf-8?q?Philippe_Mathieu-Daud=C3=A9_=28philmd?= =?utf-8?q?=29?= References: <155216177409.9624.16357609956497374456.malonedeb@gac.canonical.com> Message-Id: <156623735058.22999.5452030542189411929.malone@chaenomeles.canonical.com> X-Launchpad-Message-Rationale: Subscriber (QEMU) @qemu-devel-ml X-Launchpad-Message-For: qemu-devel-ml Precedence: bulk X-Generated-By: Launchpad (canonical.com); Revision="19022"; Instance="launchpad-lazr.conf" X-Launchpad-Hash: 9a9c095989f5006fd881d0b5cbba17906a01dbda X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 91.189.90.7 Subject: [Qemu-devel] [Bug 1819289] Re: Windows 95 and Windows 98 will not install or run X-BeenThere: qemu-devel@nongnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Reply-To: Bug 1819289 <1819289@bugs.launchpad.net> Errors-To: qemu-devel-bounces+qemu-devel=archiver.kernel.org@nongnu.org Sender: "Qemu-devel" On 8/19/19 7:26 PM, Brad Parker wrote: > Whoops, 3.11.0 does not exist. Went back and did a full bisect. 3.0.0 > works fine, and the breakage starts before 3.0.1 and 3.1.0 was released, > specifically, with commit 05306935b1ae49107c2dc2f301574dd6c29b6838. This commit is migration related. Are you trying to restore/launch a pre-installed image? John reported "either not install or will not run 95 or 98 at all" but you report "95 just reboots infinitely after trying to boot from HDD after the initial setup." which is slighly different. What host/os/distrib are you using? What command line are you using to start QEMU? If you are using migration, I wonder if the following commit might affect here: commit 341ba0df4c69269cac839ddbacb2a0ca641a856d Author: Peter Maydell Date: Tue Sep 25 17:19:24 2018 +0100 migration/ram.c: Avoid taking address of fields in packed MultiFDInit_t= struct = Taking the address of a field in a packed struct is a bad idea, because it might not be actually aligned enough for that pointer type (and thus cause a crash on dereference on some host architectures). Newer versions of clang warn about this: = Avoid the bug by not using the "modify in place" byteswapping functions. -- = You received this bug notification because you are a member of qemu- devel-ml, which is subscribed to QEMU. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1819289 Title: Windows 95 and Windows 98 will not install or run Status in QEMU: New Bug description: The last version of QEMU I have been able to run Windows 95 or Windows 98 on was 2.7 or 2.8. Recent versions since then even up to 3.1 will either not install or will not run 95 or 98 at all. I have tried every combination of options like isapc or no isapc, cpu pentium or cpu as 486. Tried different memory configurations, but they just don't work anymore. To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/qemu/+bug/1819289/+subscriptions