qemu-devel.nongnu.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Philippe Mathieu-Daudé" <philmd@redhat.com>
To: "Markus Armbruster" <armbru@redhat.com>,
	"Alex Bennée" <alex.bennee@linaro.org>
Cc: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>,
	Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>,
	Jason Wang <jasowang@redhat.com>,
	qemu-devel@nongnu.org, Gerd Hoffmann <kraxel@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: please try to avoid sending pullreqs late on release-candidate day
Date: Thu, 23 Jul 2020 12:26:57 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <16f1e661-edaa-2ee2-008d-3c9ad0e5e10d@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <87o8o6pwwm.fsf@dusky.pond.sub.org>

On 7/23/20 8:28 AM, Markus Armbruster wrote:
> Alex Bennée <alex.bennee@linaro.org> writes:
> 
>> Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com> writes:
>>
>>> Am 21.07.2020 um 17:56 hat Peter Maydell geschrieben:
>>>> It is not helpful if everybody sends their pullrequests late
>>>> on the Tuesday afternoon, as there just isn't enough time in the
>>>> day to merge test and apply them all before I have to cut the tag.
>>>> Please, if you can, try to send pullrequests earlier, eg Monday.
>>>
>> <snip>
>>>
>>> So given that we _will_ have some late patches, what can we do to
>>> improve the situation?
>>>
>>> Maybe I could send the pull request before testing it to save some time.
>>> Your tests will take a while anyway, so if my own testing fails (e.g.
>>> for the parts of iotests that you don't test), I would still have time
>>> to NACK my own pull request. This wouldn't buy us more than an hour at
>>> most and could lead to wasted testing effort on your side (which is
>>> exactly the resource we want to save).
>>>
>>> Can you test multiple pull requests at once? The Tuesday ones tend to be
>>> small (between 1 and 3 patches was what I saw yesterday), so they should
>>> be much less likely to fail than large pull requests. If you test two
>>> pull requests together and it fails so you have to retest one of them in
>>> isolation, you still haven't really lost time compared to testing both
>>> individually. And if it succeeds, you cut the testing time in half.
>>
>> I've taken to just stacking up patches from my multiple trees to avoid
>> sending more than one PR a week. Of course sometimes the stack grows a
>> bit too tall and becomes unwieldy :-/
> 
> You're right, stacking unrelated smaller pull requests makes sense when
> pulling all the pull requests in flight races with a deadline.

I tend to disagree, since few patches from the "candidate fixes for
5.1-rc1" series are still being discussed, and we are past rc1. Half
of them could have been merged in for rc1.



  reply	other threads:[~2020-07-23 10:27 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-07-21 15:56 please try to avoid sending pullreqs late on release-candidate day Peter Maydell
2020-07-21 21:16 ` Gerd Hoffmann
2020-07-22  8:05   ` Peter Maydell
2020-07-22  3:34 ` Jason Wang
2020-07-22  9:36 ` Kevin Wolf
2020-07-22 11:50   ` Peter Maydell
2020-07-22 12:16   ` Alex Bennée
2020-07-23  6:28     ` Markus Armbruster
2020-07-23 10:26       ` Philippe Mathieu-Daudé [this message]
2020-07-23 11:12         ` Markus Armbruster
2020-07-23 16:36         ` Alex Bennée

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=16f1e661-edaa-2ee2-008d-3c9ad0e5e10d@redhat.com \
    --to=philmd@redhat.com \
    --cc=alex.bennee@linaro.org \
    --cc=armbru@redhat.com \
    --cc=jasowang@redhat.com \
    --cc=kraxel@redhat.com \
    --cc=kwolf@redhat.com \
    --cc=peter.maydell@linaro.org \
    --cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).