From: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
To: Eugenio Perez Martin <eperezma@redhat.com>
Cc: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>,
Juan Quintela <quintela@redhat.com>,
Jason Wang <jasowang@redhat.com>,
qemu-devel@nongnu.org, Peter Xu <peterx@redhat.com>,
Avi Kivity <avi@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC v2 0/1] memory: Delete assertion in memory_region_unregister_iommu_notifier
Date: Fri, 3 Jul 2020 12:10:53 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <19ad73ce-8e21-5ec2-f88f-6ec183bc1b6b@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAJaqyWe3QoCQ7=pe7mCpa548kLRDdhhfLydtbgzX7nkSkJ6img@mail.gmail.com>
On 03/07/20 09:39, Eugenio Perez Martin wrote:
> #4 0x0000555555888171 in memory_region_notify_one
> (notifier=0x7ffde0487fa8, entry=0x7ffde5dfe200) at
> /home/qemu/memory.c:1918
> 1918 assert(entry->iova >= notifier->start && entry_end <=
> notifier->end);
> (gdb) p *entry
> $1 = {target_as = 0x555556f6c050, iova = 0, translated_addr = 0,
> addr_mask = 18446744073709551615, perm = IOMMU_NONE}
Oh, I see now. I am worried that an IOMMU notifier could interpret the
IOMMUTLBEntry incorrectly if there is only partial overlap. There are
various possibilities:
1) create another IOMMUTLBEntry like
hwaddr offset = notifier->start > entry->iova ? notifier->start -
entry->iova : 0;
IOMMUTLBEntry partial = {
.target_as = entry->target_as,
.iova = entry->iova + offset,
.translated_addr = entry->translated_addr + offset,
.addr_mask = MIN(entry->addr_mask, notifier->end - notifier->start),
.perm = entry->perm
};
The addr_mask however would not be a mask if the notifier is not
naturally aligned
2) pass the offset/size pair (computed as above) as extra arguments to
the IOMMUNotify function
3) add a function to compute the offset/size and call it in the notifier
You choose. :)
Paolo
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-07-03 10:19 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 68+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-06-26 6:41 [RFC v2 0/1] memory: Delete assertion in memory_region_unregister_iommu_notifier Eugenio Pérez
2020-06-26 6:41 ` [RFC v2 1/1] " Eugenio Pérez
2020-06-26 21:29 ` Peter Xu
2020-06-27 7:26 ` Yan Zhao
2020-06-27 12:57 ` Peter Xu
2020-06-28 1:36 ` Yan Zhao
2020-06-28 7:03 ` Jason Wang
2020-06-28 14:47 ` Peter Xu
2020-06-29 5:51 ` Jason Wang
2020-06-29 13:34 ` Peter Xu
2020-06-30 2:41 ` Jason Wang
2020-06-30 8:29 ` Jason Wang
2020-06-30 9:21 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2020-06-30 9:23 ` Jason Wang
2020-06-30 15:20 ` Peter Xu
2020-07-01 8:11 ` Jason Wang
2020-07-01 12:16 ` Peter Xu
2020-07-01 12:30 ` Jason Wang
2020-07-01 12:41 ` Peter Xu
2020-07-02 3:00 ` Jason Wang
2020-06-30 15:39 ` Peter Xu
2020-07-01 8:09 ` Jason Wang
2020-07-02 3:01 ` Jason Wang
2020-07-02 15:45 ` Peter Xu
2020-07-03 7:24 ` Jason Wang
2020-07-03 13:03 ` Peter Xu
2020-07-07 8:03 ` Jason Wang
2020-07-07 19:54 ` Peter Xu
2020-07-08 5:42 ` Jason Wang
2020-07-08 14:16 ` Peter Xu
2020-07-09 5:58 ` Jason Wang
2020-07-09 14:10 ` Peter Xu
2020-07-10 6:34 ` Jason Wang
2020-07-10 13:30 ` Peter Xu
2020-07-13 4:04 ` Jason Wang
2020-07-16 1:00 ` Peter Xu
2020-07-16 2:54 ` Jason Wang
2020-07-17 14:18 ` Peter Xu
2020-07-20 4:02 ` Jason Wang
2020-07-20 13:03 ` Peter Xu
2020-07-21 6:20 ` Jason Wang
2020-07-21 15:10 ` Peter Xu
2020-08-03 16:00 ` Eugenio Pérez
2020-08-04 20:30 ` Peter Xu
2020-08-05 5:45 ` Jason Wang
2020-08-11 17:01 ` Eugenio Perez Martin
2020-08-11 17:10 ` Eugenio Perez Martin
2020-06-29 15:05 ` [RFC v2 0/1] " Paolo Bonzini
2020-07-03 7:39 ` Eugenio Perez Martin
2020-07-03 10:10 ` Paolo Bonzini [this message]
2020-08-11 17:55 ` [RFC v3 " Eugenio Pérez
2020-08-11 17:55 ` [RFC v3 1/1] memory: Skip bad range assertion if notifier supports arbitrary masks Eugenio Pérez
2020-08-12 2:24 ` Jason Wang
2020-08-12 8:49 ` Eugenio Perez Martin
2020-08-18 14:24 ` Eugenio Perez Martin
2020-08-19 7:15 ` Jason Wang
2020-08-19 8:22 ` Eugenio Perez Martin
2020-08-19 9:36 ` Jason Wang
2020-08-19 15:50 ` Peter Xu
2020-08-20 2:28 ` Jason Wang
2020-08-21 14:12 ` Peter Xu
2020-09-01 3:05 ` Jason Wang
2020-09-01 19:35 ` Peter Xu
2020-09-02 5:13 ` Jason Wang
2020-08-11 18:10 ` [RFC v3 0/1] memory: Delete assertion in memory_region_unregister_iommu_notifier Eugenio Perez Martin
2020-08-11 19:27 ` Peter Xu
2020-08-12 14:33 ` Eugenio Perez Martin
2020-08-12 21:12 ` Peter Xu
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=19ad73ce-8e21-5ec2-f88f-6ec183bc1b6b@redhat.com \
--to=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=avi@redhat.com \
--cc=eperezma@redhat.com \
--cc=jasowang@redhat.com \
--cc=peter.maydell@linaro.org \
--cc=peterx@redhat.com \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
--cc=quintela@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).