qemu-devel.nongnu.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Andrew Jeffery" <andrew@aj.id.au>
To: "Philippe Mathieu-Daudé" <f4bug@amsat.org>,
	"Cameron Esfahani via" <qemu-devel@nongnu.org>
Cc: "Kevin Wolf" <kwolf@redhat.com>,
	"Peter Maydell" <peter.maydell@linaro.org>,
	qemu-block@nongnu.org, "Corey Minyard" <minyard@acm.org>,
	"Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>,
	"David Hildenbrand" <david@redhat.com>,
	"Mark Cave-Ayland" <mark.cave-ayland@ilande.co.uk>,
	"Max Reitz" <mreitz@redhat.com>,
	qemu-arm@nongnu.org, "Joel Stanley" <joel@jms.id.au>,
	"Paolo Bonzini" <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
	"Cédric Le Goater" <clg@kaod.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 7/7] hw/watchdog/wdt_aspeed: Reduce timer precision to micro-second
Date: Mon, 22 Jun 2020 09:51:59 +0930	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1acc89c9-8a5c-4ba5-9201-2f0124cd7969@www.fastmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <ad812821-8b06-bb82-d336-ffb1e7c14839@amsat.org>



On Wed, 17 Jun 2020, at 13:11, Philippe Mathieu-Daudé wrote:
> Hi Andrew,
> 
> On 6/17/20 3:18 AM, Andrew Jeffery wrote:
> > On Tue, 16 Jun 2020, at 17:21, Philippe Mathieu-Daudé wrote:
> >> The current implementation uses nano-second precision, while
> >> the watchdog can not be more precise than a micro-second.
> > 
> > What's the basis for this assertion? It's true for the AST2500 and AST2600, but 
> > the AST2400 can run the watchdog from either a 1MHz clock source or the APB 
> > clock (which must be at least 16.5MHz on palmetto). The reset state on the
> > AST2400 configures the watchdog for the APB clock rate.
> > 
> > The Linux driver will eventually configure the watchdog for 1MHz mode
> > regardless so perhaps the AST2400 reset state is a bit of a corner case, but
> > I feel the assertion should be watered down a bit?
> 
> What about this description?
> 
> "The current implementation uses nano-second precision, but
>  is not more precise than micro-second precision.
>  Simplify by using a micro-second based timer.
>  Rename the timer 'timer_us' to have the unit explicit."

So is this a limitation of QEMUTimer? I was establishing that the hardware can 
operate at greater than 1 micro-second precision.

Andrew


  reply	other threads:[~2020-06-22  0:23 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-06-16  7:51 [PATCH 0/7] misc: Reduce QEMUTimer pressure by using lower precision when possible Philippe Mathieu-Daudé
2020-06-16  7:51 ` [PATCH 1/7] qemu-common: Briefly document qemu_timedate_diff() unit Philippe Mathieu-Daudé
2020-06-18  5:47   ` Markus Armbruster
2020-06-22  8:50     ` Philippe Mathieu-Daudé
2020-06-16  7:51 ` [PATCH 2/7] block/qcow2: Document cache_clean_interval field holds seconds Philippe Mathieu-Daudé
2020-06-16  7:51 ` [PATCH 3/7] block/curl: Reduce timer precision to milli-second Philippe Mathieu-Daudé
2020-06-16  7:51 ` [PATCH 4/7] hw/virtio/virtio-balloon: Rename timer field including 'ms' unit Philippe Mathieu-Daudé
2020-06-16  7:57   ` David Hildenbrand
2020-06-16  7:51 ` [PATCH 5/7] hw/rtc/m48t59: Reduce timer precision to milli-second Philippe Mathieu-Daudé
2020-07-08 23:39   ` Richard Henderson
2020-06-16  7:51 ` [PATCH 6/7] hw/ipmi/ipmi_bmc_extern: " Philippe Mathieu-Daudé
2020-06-16  7:51 ` [PATCH 7/7] hw/watchdog/wdt_aspeed: Reduce timer precision to micro-second Philippe Mathieu-Daudé
2020-06-17  1:18   ` Andrew Jeffery
2020-06-17  3:41     ` Philippe Mathieu-Daudé
2020-06-22  0:21       ` Andrew Jeffery [this message]
2020-06-22  8:43         ` Philippe Mathieu-Daudé
2020-06-22 23:45           ` Andrew Jeffery
2020-07-08 23:40   ` Richard Henderson
2020-06-18 12:23 ` [PATCH 0/7] misc: Reduce QEMUTimer pressure by using lower precision when possible Paolo Bonzini
2020-06-18 12:26   ` Philippe Mathieu-Daudé
2020-06-18 12:42     ` Paolo Bonzini
2020-07-08 23:37 ` Richard Henderson

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1acc89c9-8a5c-4ba5-9201-2f0124cd7969@www.fastmail.com \
    --to=andrew@aj.id.au \
    --cc=clg@kaod.org \
    --cc=david@redhat.com \
    --cc=f4bug@amsat.org \
    --cc=joel@jms.id.au \
    --cc=kwolf@redhat.com \
    --cc=mark.cave-ayland@ilande.co.uk \
    --cc=minyard@acm.org \
    --cc=mreitz@redhat.com \
    --cc=mst@redhat.com \
    --cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
    --cc=peter.maydell@linaro.org \
    --cc=qemu-arm@nongnu.org \
    --cc=qemu-block@nongnu.org \
    --cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).