On Wed, Nov 11, 2015 at 11:27:45AM +1100, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
> The "ICP" is a different object than the "XICS". For historical reasons,
> we have a number of places where we name a variable "icp" while it contains
> a XICSState pointer. There *is* an ICPState structure too so this makes
> the code really confusing.
> 
> This is a mechanical replacement of all those instances to use the name
> "xics" instead. There should be no functional change.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>

Ah, good idea.  I think I'll take this one independently as well.

-- 
David Gibson			| I'll have my music baroque, and my code
david AT gibson.dropbear.id.au	| minimalist, thank you.  NOT _the_ _other_
				| _way_ _around_!
http://www.ozlabs.org/~dgibson