From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:56241) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aNdw3-0002FU-Kc for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 25 Jan 2016 04:59:48 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aNdw0-0004Wa-Et for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 25 Jan 2016 04:59:47 -0500 Date: Mon, 25 Jan 2016 10:00:34 +0000 From: Alyssa Milburn Message-ID: <20160125100034.GA23365@li141-249.members.linode.com> References: <1453581610-23179-1-git-send-email-hpoussin@reactos.org> <1453581610-23179-14-git-send-email-hpoussin@reactos.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1453581610-23179-14-git-send-email-hpoussin@reactos.org> Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 13/13] cuda: remove CUDA_GET_SET_IIC/CUDA_COMBINED_FORMAT_IIC commands List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: =?iso-8859-1?Q?Herv=E9?= Poussineau Cc: Mark Cave-Ayland , qemu-devel@nongnu.org, Alexander Graf , Alyssa Milburn , qemu-ppc@nongnu.org, David Gibson On Sat, Jan 23, 2016 at 09:40:10PM +0100, Herv=E9 Poussineau wrote: > We currently don't emulate the I2C bus provided by CUDA. The MOL source has the comment /* this reply is important on B&W G3 */ in the CUDA_COMBINED_FORMAT_IIC case (differentiating it from the general 0x= 2 error case); any idea if that's relevant? (0x5 is an SRQ error? I guess i= t would also be nice to add constants for all these magic numbers.) - Alyssa