From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:54096) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aRIg3-0003Nk-NK for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 04 Feb 2016 07:06:24 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aRIfy-0004XF-JC for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 04 Feb 2016 07:06:22 -0500 Date: Thu, 4 Feb 2016 14:06:10 +0200 From: "Michael S. Tsirkin" Message-ID: <20160204140322-mutt-send-email-mst@redhat.com> References: <1453978470-222624-1-git-send-email-imammedo@redhat.com> <1453978688-222752-1-git-send-email-imammedo@redhat.com> <20160128140212.GS3869@thinpad.lan.raisama.net> <20160128180031.1d940e2f@nial.brq.redhat.com> <20160203175504.GI26314@thinpad.lan.raisama.net> <20160203205556-mutt-send-email-mst@redhat.com> <56B33676.6000502@redhat.com> <56B338F3.8000500@suse.de> <56B33C2A.8030405@redhat.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <56B33C2A.8030405@redhat.com> Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] qdev & hw/core owner? (was Re: [PATCH v19 7/9] machine: add properties to compat_props incrementaly) List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Paolo Bonzini Cc: agraf@suse.de, Eduardo Habkost , Peter Maydell , ghammer@redhat.com, qemu-devel@nongnu.org, lcapitulino@redhat.com, borntraeger@de.ibm.com, qemu-ppc@nongnu.org, Gerd Hoffmann , cornelia.huck@de.ibm.com, Igor Mammedov , rth@twiddle.net, lersek@redhat.com, Andreas =?iso-8859-1?Q?F=E4rber?= , Marcel Apfelbaum , david@gibson.dropbear.id.au On Thu, Feb 04, 2016 at 12:55:22PM +0100, Paolo Bonzini wrote: >=20 >=20 > On 04/02/2016 12:41, Andreas F=E4rber wrote: > > You're talking about machine, right? Some time ago I had proposed Mar= cel > > who initially worked on it, but I'm fine with anyone taking it. >=20 > Yes. >=20 > > For some (but not all) core qdev parts related to the (stalled) QOM > > migration I've been taking care of via qom-next. Last time this came = up > > you didn't want anyone to be M: for qdev, so maybe we can use R: so t= hat > > at least people automatically get CC'ed and we avoid this recurring > > discussion? >=20 > I might have changed my mind on that. You definitely should be M: for = qdev. >=20 > Paolo If Andreas wants to, that's also fine. Several maintainers are better than one. --=20 MST