From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:38366)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from
	<SRS0=jubA=OJ=ens-lyon.org=samuel.thibault@bounce.ens-lyon.org>)
	id 1aTPLF-0007y2-1b
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 10 Feb 2016 02:37:37 -0500
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from
	<SRS0=jubA=OJ=ens-lyon.org=samuel.thibault@bounce.ens-lyon.org>)
	id 1aTPLA-0003WA-1t
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 10 Feb 2016 02:37:36 -0500
Received: from sonata.ens-lyon.org ([140.77.166.138]:40719)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from
	<SRS0=jubA=OJ=ens-lyon.org=samuel.thibault@bounce.ens-lyon.org>)
	id 1aTPL9-0003UL-RV
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 10 Feb 2016 02:37:31 -0500
Date: Wed, 10 Feb 2016 08:37:27 +0100
From: Samuel Thibault <samuel.thibault@gnu.org>
Message-ID: <20160210073727.GI2673@var.home>
References: <cover.1454927009.git.samuel.thibault@ens-lyon.org>
	<e4a16e2d4a3d7cd589639222c0414d265ed41226.1454927009.git.samuel.thibault@ens-lyon.org>
	<56BA4FA2.1070809@redhat.com> <20160209211359.GK2673@var.home>
	<20160209211912.GM2673@var.home> <56BAE455.1040909@redhat.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <56BAE455.1040909@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCHv7 3/9] slirp: Adding IPv6 UDP support
List-Id: <qemu-devel.nongnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/options/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.nongnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:qemu-devel@nongnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=subscribe>
To: Thomas Huth <thuth@redhat.com>
Cc: zhanghailiang <zhang.zhanghailiang@huawei.com>, Li Zhijian <lizhijian@cn.fujitsu.com>, Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@gmail.com>, Jason Wang <jasowang@redhat.com>, qemu-devel@nongnu.org, Vasiliy Tolstov <v.tolstov@selfip.ru>, Dave Gilbert <dgilbert@redhat.com>, Gonglei <arei.gonglei@huawei.com>, Jan Kiszka <jan.kiszka@siemens.com>, Huangpeng <peter.huangpeng@huawei.com>, Guillaume Subiron <maethor@subiron.org>

Thomas Huth, on Wed 10 Feb 2016 08:18:45 +0100, wrote:
> On 09.02.2016 22:19, Samuel Thibault wrote:
> > Thanks for your reviews so far!  I have integrated the rest of comments,
> > the only remaining question for patches 1-3 is about srand() and rand().
> 
> I personally don't mind whether you use rand(), g_random_int_range() or
> g_rand_int_range() here, but of course, the ..._range() functions seem
> to fit more naturally here.
> I just think that if you use rand() or g_random_int_range(), the rng
> should be seeded from the main() function, not from the slirp code.

Understood, but what do maintainers prefer?  I don't mind either way, I
just want to write what will be preferred.

Samuel