From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.9 required=3.0 tests=HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 78346C10F11 for ; Sat, 13 Apr 2019 08:41:36 +0000 (UTC) Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4AE5E20850 for ; Sat, 13 Apr 2019 08:41:36 +0000 (UTC) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 4AE5E20850 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=durchholz.org Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=qemu-devel-bounces+qemu-devel=archiver.kernel.org@nongnu.org Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:48583 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1hFEEB-00029V-Kn for qemu-devel@archiver.kernel.org; Sat, 13 Apr 2019 04:41:35 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:40619) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1hFEDQ-0001iH-CY for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sat, 13 Apr 2019 04:40:49 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1hFEDP-0007E9-Dc for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sat, 13 Apr 2019 04:40:48 -0400 Received: from indium.canonical.com ([91.189.90.7]:47850) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1hFEDP-0007Di-5F for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sat, 13 Apr 2019 04:40:47 -0400 Received: from loganberry.canonical.com ([91.189.90.37]) by indium.canonical.com with esmtp (Exim 4.86_2 #2 (Debian)) id 1hFEDO-0001h4-GR for ; Sat, 13 Apr 2019 08:40:46 +0000 Received: from loganberry.canonical.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by loganberry.canonical.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 748472E80C8 for ; Sat, 13 Apr 2019 08:40:46 +0000 (UTC) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Date: Sat, 13 Apr 2019 08:32:30 -0000 From: Joachim Durchholz To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org X-Launchpad-Notification-Type: bug X-Launchpad-Bug: product=qemu; status=New; importance=Undecided; assignee=None; X-Launchpad-Bug-Information-Type: Public X-Launchpad-Bug-Private: no X-Launchpad-Bug-Security-Vulnerability: no X-Launchpad-Bug-Commenters: jo-durchholz X-Launchpad-Bug-Reporter: Joachim Durchholz (jo-durchholz) X-Launchpad-Bug-Modifier: Joachim Durchholz (jo-durchholz) References: <155514426371.20376.231958396525560199.malonedeb@soybean.canonical.com> Message-Id: <155514435111.20985.14040450486717845008.malone@soybean.canonical.com> X-Launchpad-Message-Rationale: Subscriber (QEMU) @qemu-devel-ml X-Launchpad-Message-For: qemu-devel-ml Precedence: bulk X-Generated-By: Launchpad (canonical.com); Revision="18920"; Instance="launchpad-lazr.conf" X-Launchpad-Hash: ba65ab3c75c3be7ccf4efe165f3f8ee9a931ecb2 X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 91.189.90.7 Subject: [Qemu-devel] [Bug 1824616] Re: Build succeeds despite flex/bison missing X-BeenThere: qemu-devel@nongnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Reply-To: Bug 1824616 <1824616@bugs.launchpad.net> Errors-To: qemu-devel-bounces+qemu-devel=archiver.kernel.org@nongnu.org Sender: "Qemu-devel" Message-ID: <20190413083230.K8W3DGjWhuWVGb8zjQfGjhDANqAWRO4o89oCVAnhEr8@z> s/install/git clone/ -- = You received this bug notification because you are a member of qemu- devel-ml, which is subscribed to QEMU. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1824616 Title: Build succeeds despite flex/bison missing Status in QEMU: New Bug description: I just built qemu using a fresh install, and "make" would report success despite messages of "flex: command not found" and "bison: command not found". I didn't notice any errors, but I don't know whether that's because there's a workaround in case the tools aren't there, or because I didn't exercize the code paths that would fail. To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/qemu/+bug/1824616/+subscriptions