From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.3 required=3.0 tests=HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6D9D1C0650F for ; Tue, 30 Jul 2019 11:37:06 +0000 (UTC) Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 41A8A206E0 for ; Tue, 30 Jul 2019 11:37:06 +0000 (UTC) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 41A8A206E0 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=redhat.com Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=qemu-devel-bounces+qemu-devel=archiver.kernel.org@nongnu.org Received: from localhost ([::1]:59937 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.86_2) (envelope-from ) id 1hsQRF-0008F2-GL for qemu-devel@archiver.kernel.org; Tue, 30 Jul 2019 07:37:05 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:54295) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.86_2) (envelope-from ) id 1hsQPu-0006qs-OV for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 30 Jul 2019 07:35:44 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1hsQPt-0004IG-H7 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 30 Jul 2019 07:35:42 -0400 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:47152) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1hsQPp-0004FZ-CM; Tue, 30 Jul 2019 07:35:37 -0400 Received: from smtp.corp.redhat.com (int-mx04.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.14]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6C35630C1342; Tue, 30 Jul 2019 11:35:36 +0000 (UTC) Received: from sirius.home.kraxel.org (ovpn-116-54.ams2.redhat.com [10.36.116.54]) by smtp.corp.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5116E5D96F; Tue, 30 Jul 2019 11:35:29 +0000 (UTC) Received: by sirius.home.kraxel.org (Postfix, from userid 1000) id B593E16E1A; Tue, 30 Jul 2019 13:35:27 +0200 (CEST) Date: Tue, 30 Jul 2019 13:35:27 +0200 From: Gerd Hoffmann To: John Snow Message-ID: <20190730113527.4f4ypo66wv4xktoq@sirius.home.kraxel.org> References: <20190626123948.10199-1-shmuel.eiderman@oracle.com> <20190701074117.pkmzhon6v7nafq2p@sirius.home.kraxel.org> <424BE97C-7EAF-4B28-B580-AC2B5261197C@oracle.com> <20190717194623.GF6471@localhost.localdomain> <65B72D23-26BE-4C3B-B298-A6231D08BF6C@oracle.com> <63344112-c84b-f239-3c34-ad3a613910f7@redhat.com> <3ecc13e7-097f-7e8c-347d-443020c944d2@redhat.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <3ecc13e7-097f-7e8c-347d-443020c944d2@redhat.com> User-Agent: NeoMutt/20180716 X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.79 on 10.5.11.14 X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.5.16 (mx1.redhat.com [10.5.110.45]); Tue, 30 Jul 2019 11:35:36 +0000 (UTC) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 209.132.183.28 Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [Qemu-block] [QEMU] [PATCH v5 0/8] Add Qemu to SeaBIOS LCHS interface X-BeenThere: qemu-devel@nongnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: Kevin Wolf , qemu-block@nongnu.org, Arbel Moshe , philmd@redhat.com, seabios@seabios.org, QEMU , Max Reitz , Kevin O'Connor , Sam Eiderman , Liran Alon , Laszlo Ersek Errors-To: qemu-devel-bounces+qemu-devel=archiver.kernel.org@nongnu.org Sender: "Qemu-devel" Hi, [ just back from summer vacation, wading through my backlog ... ] > > I feel like it would be up to Gerd as the general SeaBIOS point of contact? > > > > ...ah, who is offline for vacation. > > We're in freeze right now anyway, so I would think that Gerd and/or > Kevin can work out who ought to stage this for a PR when the tree opens > again. As this touches alot of block code I've expected it to go via block tree, therefore I've added my reviewed-by to indicate the fw_cfg / seabios side of things is fine from my point of view. seabios patches are reviewed and ready. Merging via Phil's fw_cfg tree would make sense too, but Phil probably wants an ack from the block layer guys in that case. cheers, Gerd