From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.8 required=3.0 tests=HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, INCLUDES_PATCH,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SIGNED_OFF_BY,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B5D5CC3A589 for ; Sun, 18 Aug 2019 22:59:54 +0000 (UTC) Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8A18D2186A for ; Sun, 18 Aug 2019 22:59:54 +0000 (UTC) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 8A18D2186A Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=redhat.com Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=qemu-devel-bounces+qemu-devel=archiver.kernel.org@nongnu.org Received: from localhost ([::1]:43422 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1hzU9R-0006By-9I for qemu-devel@archiver.kernel.org; Sun, 18 Aug 2019 18:59:53 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:48508) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1hzU56-0000wO-Vr for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sun, 18 Aug 2019 18:55:26 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1hzU55-0008Gs-Q7 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sun, 18 Aug 2019 18:55:24 -0400 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:36604) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1hzU55-0008Ga-Ip for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sun, 18 Aug 2019 18:55:23 -0400 Received: from smtp.corp.redhat.com (int-mx06.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.16]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DCFCBC058CA4; Sun, 18 Aug 2019 22:55:22 +0000 (UTC) Received: from x1w.redhat.com (ovpn-204-33.brq.redhat.com [10.40.204.33]) by smtp.corp.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id F250E1D1; Sun, 18 Aug 2019 22:55:15 +0000 (UTC) From: =?UTF-8?q?Philippe=20Mathieu-Daud=C3=A9?= To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org Date: Mon, 19 Aug 2019 00:54:06 +0200 Message-Id: <20190818225414.22590-8-philmd@redhat.com> In-Reply-To: <20190818225414.22590-1-philmd@redhat.com> References: <20190818225414.22590-1-philmd@redhat.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.79 on 10.5.11.16 X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.5.16 (mx1.redhat.com [10.5.110.32]); Sun, 18 Aug 2019 22:55:22 +0000 (UTC) Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 209.132.183.28 Subject: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v4 07/15] hw/i386/pc: Pass the CPUArchIdList array by argument X-BeenThere: qemu-devel@nongnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: Yang Zhong , Samuel Ortiz , Rob Bradford , "Michael S. Tsirkin" , Marcelo Tosatti , kvm@vger.kernel.org, Christophe de Dinechin , Paolo Bonzini , Richard Henderson , =?UTF-8?q?Philippe=20Mathieu-Daud=C3=A9?= , Eduardo Habkost Errors-To: qemu-devel-bounces+qemu-devel=archiver.kernel.org@nongnu.org Sender: "Qemu-devel" Pass the CPUArchIdList array by argument, this will allow us to remove the PCMachineState argument later. Suggested-by: Samuel Ortiz Signed-off-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daud=C3=A9 --- hw/i386/pc.c | 19 +++++++++---------- 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-) diff --git a/hw/i386/pc.c b/hw/i386/pc.c index b97d1991cf..d296b3c3e1 100644 --- a/hw/i386/pc.c +++ b/hw/i386/pc.c @@ -934,14 +934,13 @@ static void pc_build_smbios(PCMachineState *pcms) } =20 static FWCfgState *fw_cfg_arch_create(PCMachineState *pcms, + const CPUArchIdList *cpus, uint16_t boot_cpus, uint16_t apic_id_limit) { FWCfgState *fw_cfg; uint64_t *numa_fw_cfg; int i; - const CPUArchIdList *cpus; - MachineClass *mc =3D MACHINE_GET_CLASS(pcms); =20 fw_cfg =3D fw_cfg_init_io_dma(FW_CFG_IO_BASE, FW_CFG_IO_BASE + 4, &address_space_memory); @@ -959,7 +958,7 @@ static FWCfgState *fw_cfg_arch_create(PCMachineState = *pcms, * So for compatibility reasons with old BIOSes we are stuck with * "etc/max-cpus" actually being apic_id_limit */ - fw_cfg_add_i16(fw_cfg, FW_CFG_MAX_CPUS, (uint16_t)pcms->apic_id_limi= t); + fw_cfg_add_i16(fw_cfg, FW_CFG_MAX_CPUS, apic_id_limit); fw_cfg_add_i64(fw_cfg, FW_CFG_RAM_SIZE, (uint64_t)ram_size); fw_cfg_add_bytes(fw_cfg, FW_CFG_ACPI_TABLES, acpi_tables, acpi_tables_len); @@ -975,20 +974,19 @@ static FWCfgState *fw_cfg_arch_create(PCMachineStat= e *pcms, * of nodes, one word for each VCPU->node and one word for each node= to * hold the amount of memory. */ - numa_fw_cfg =3D g_new0(uint64_t, 1 + pcms->apic_id_limit + nb_numa_n= odes); + numa_fw_cfg =3D g_new0(uint64_t, 1 + apic_id_limit + nb_numa_nodes); numa_fw_cfg[0] =3D cpu_to_le64(nb_numa_nodes); - cpus =3D mc->possible_cpu_arch_ids(MACHINE(pcms)); for (i =3D 0; i < cpus->len; i++) { unsigned int apic_id =3D cpus->cpus[i].arch_id; - assert(apic_id < pcms->apic_id_limit); + assert(apic_id < apic_id_limit); numa_fw_cfg[apic_id + 1] =3D cpu_to_le64(cpus->cpus[i].props.nod= e_id); } for (i =3D 0; i < nb_numa_nodes; i++) { - numa_fw_cfg[pcms->apic_id_limit + 1 + i] =3D + numa_fw_cfg[apic_id_limit + 1 + i] =3D cpu_to_le64(numa_info[i].node_mem); } fw_cfg_add_bytes(fw_cfg, FW_CFG_NUMA, numa_fw_cfg, - (1 + pcms->apic_id_limit + nb_numa_nodes) * + (1 + apic_id_limit + nb_numa_nodes) * sizeof(*numa_fw_cfg)); =20 return fw_cfg; @@ -1760,6 +1758,7 @@ void pc_memory_init(PCMachineState *pcms, MemoryRegion *ram_below_4g, *ram_above_4g; FWCfgState *fw_cfg; MachineState *machine =3D MACHINE(pcms); + MachineClass *mc =3D MACHINE_GET_CLASS(machine); PCMachineClass *pcmc =3D PC_MACHINE_GET_CLASS(pcms); =20 assert(machine->ram_size =3D=3D pcms->below_4g_mem_size + @@ -1793,7 +1792,6 @@ void pc_memory_init(PCMachineState *pcms, if (!pcmc->has_reserved_memory && (machine->ram_slots || (machine->maxram_size > machine->ram_size))) { - MachineClass *mc =3D MACHINE_GET_CLASS(machine); =20 error_report("\"-memory 'slots|maxmem'\" is not supported by: %s= ", mc->name); @@ -1856,7 +1854,8 @@ void pc_memory_init(PCMachineState *pcms, option_rom_mr, 1); =20 - fw_cfg =3D fw_cfg_arch_create(pcms, pcms->boot_cpus, pcms->apic_id_l= imit); + fw_cfg =3D fw_cfg_arch_create(pcms, mc->possible_cpu_arch_ids(machin= e), + pcms->boot_cpus, pcms->apic_id_limit); =20 rom_set_fw(fw_cfg); =20 --=20 2.20.1