From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.2 required=3.0 tests=HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED,USER_AGENT_SANE_2 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BAFD9C3A59D for ; Mon, 19 Aug 2019 09:49:12 +0000 (UTC) Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8F64E20989 for ; Mon, 19 Aug 2019 09:49:12 +0000 (UTC) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 8F64E20989 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=huawei.com Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=qemu-devel-bounces+qemu-devel=archiver.kernel.org@nongnu.org Received: from localhost ([::1]:46764 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1hzeHn-0000ku-PF for qemu-devel@archiver.kernel.org; Mon, 19 Aug 2019 05:49:11 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:35749) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1hzeGq-00087C-VY for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 19 Aug 2019 05:48:14 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1hzeGp-0001zW-TC for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 19 Aug 2019 05:48:12 -0400 Received: from szxga05-in.huawei.com ([45.249.212.191]:2255 helo=huawei.com) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1hzeGd-0001oJ-No; Mon, 19 Aug 2019 05:48:00 -0400 Received: from DGGEMS410-HUB.china.huawei.com (unknown [172.30.72.59]) by Forcepoint Email with ESMTP id 87C8F8D8563844FDA1F3; Mon, 19 Aug 2019 17:47:52 +0800 (CST) Received: from localhost (10.202.226.61) by DGGEMS410-HUB.china.huawei.com (10.3.19.210) with Microsoft SMTP Server id 14.3.439.0; Mon, 19 Aug 2019 17:47:46 +0800 Date: Mon, 19 Aug 2019 10:47:30 +0100 From: Jonathan Cameron To: Peter Maydell Message-ID: <20190819104730.0000234a@huawei.com> In-Reply-To: References: <20190625112752.83188-1-Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com> Organization: Huawei X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.17.3 (GTK+ 2.24.32; i686-w64-mingw32) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Originating-IP: [10.202.226.61] X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 45.249.212.191 Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [RFC PATCH 0/7] qemu: CCIX pcie config space emulation X-BeenThere: qemu-devel@nongnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: Auger Eric , qemu-arm , Linuxarm , QEMU Developers , Jon Masters Errors-To: qemu-devel-bounces+qemu-devel=archiver.kernel.org@nongnu.org Sender: "Qemu-devel" On Fri, 16 Aug 2019 13:59:02 +0100 Peter Maydell wrote: > On Tue, 25 Jun 2019 at 12:28, Jonathan Cameron > wrote: > > > > CCIX topologies are 'layered' on top of PCIe tree topologies. > > This is done primarily by allowing a single CCIX device to appear as > > multiple disjoint nodes in the PCIe tree. =20 >=20 > > This patch is being distributed by the CCIX Consortium, Inc. (CCIX) to > > you and other parties that are paticipating (the "participants") in > > qemu with the understanding that the participants will use CCIX's > > name and trademark only when this patch is used in association with > > qemu. > > > > CCIX is also distributing this patch to these participants with the > > understanding that if any portion of the CCIX specification will be > > used or referenced in qemu, the participants will not modify the cited > > portion of the CCIX specification and will give CCIX propery copyright > > attribution by including the following copyright notice with > > the cited part of the CCIX specification: > > "=A9 2019 CCIX CONSORTIUM, INC. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED." =20 >=20 > (Apologies for replying to this now quite old email, but your > more recent followup email drew it to my attention.) >=20 > I think that as a project, QEMU can't take patches which come > with this kind of additional constraint on top of the GPL. Could > you drop these extra legal clauses, please? Jon, if you could raise this with CCIX legal that would be great. Thanks, Jonathan =20 >=20 > thanks > -- PMM