From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.2 required=3.0 tests=FROM_EXCESS_BASE64, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS, URIBL_BLOCKED,USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BB0C2C3A5A1 for ; Wed, 28 Aug 2019 13:09:11 +0000 (UTC) Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8C18C2077B for ; Wed, 28 Aug 2019 13:09:11 +0000 (UTC) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 8C18C2077B Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=redhat.com Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=qemu-devel-bounces+qemu-devel=archiver.kernel.org@nongnu.org Received: from localhost ([::1]:36204 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1i2xhG-0008WH-MP for qemu-devel@archiver.kernel.org; Wed, 28 Aug 2019 09:09:10 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:32990) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1i2xfz-0007e2-Mt for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 28 Aug 2019 09:07:53 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1i2xfy-0000g5-Ad for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 28 Aug 2019 09:07:51 -0400 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:34402) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1i2xfy-0000ei-48 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 28 Aug 2019 09:07:50 -0400 Received: from smtp.corp.redhat.com (int-mx08.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.23]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1AA3F3083391; Wed, 28 Aug 2019 13:07:48 +0000 (UTC) Received: from redhat.com (unknown [10.42.17.64]) by smtp.corp.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6231D194B2; Wed, 28 Aug 2019 13:07:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Wed, 28 Aug 2019 14:07:45 +0100 From: Daniel =?utf-8?B?UC4gQmVycmFuZ8Op?= To: Alex =?utf-8?Q?Benn=C3=A9e?= Message-ID: <20190828130745.GH2991@redhat.com> References: <20190823163931.7442-1-berrange@redhat.com> <87d0gp5v6w.fsf@linaro.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <87d0gp5v6w.fsf@linaro.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.12.1 (2019-06-15) X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.84 on 10.5.11.23 X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.5.16 (mx1.redhat.com [10.5.110.44]); Wed, 28 Aug 2019 13:07:48 +0000 (UTC) Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 209.132.183.28 Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 0/4] docs: add docs about use of automatic cleanup functions X-BeenThere: qemu-devel@nongnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Reply-To: Daniel =?utf-8?B?UC4gQmVycmFuZ8Op?= Cc: =?utf-8?Q?Marc-Andr=C3=A9?= Lureau , QEMU Errors-To: qemu-devel-bounces+qemu-devel=archiver.kernel.org@nongnu.org Sender: "Qemu-devel" On Wed, Aug 28, 2019 at 01:30:15PM +0100, Alex Benn=C3=A9e wrote: >=20 > Marc-Andr=C3=A9 Lureau writes: >=20 > > Hi > > > > On Fri, Aug 23, 2019 at 8:41 PM Daniel P. Berrang=C3=A9 wrote: > >> > >> This is ostensibly about adding docs for the g_autofree/g_autoptr > >> macros. As part of doing that, however, the existing HACKING doc > >> is merged into the CODING_STYLE doc and the text is converted to > >> markdown with a table of contents. > > > > Why not rst, so it can integrate with the rest of qemu sphinx doc? > > > > (markdown is quite poor when it comes to documenting code or > > cross-referencing etc) >=20 > I was going to say markdown does have the advantage of being renderable > on the fly on code hosting sites but it appears it works on > gitlab/github so that is an argument for being consistent with the rest > of the docs. I picked markdown because most projects seem to use a README.md and CONTRIBUTING.md file with github/gitlab, but if those sites cope with .rst for those files too, there's no reason not to use .rst. > Does anyone know what is left to get the publishing pipeline up and > running and the results linked to from www.qemu.org? Regards, Daniel --=20 |: https://berrange.com -o- https://www.flickr.com/photos/dberran= ge :| |: https://libvirt.org -o- https://fstop138.berrange.c= om :| |: https://entangle-photo.org -o- https://www.instagram.com/dberran= ge :|