qemu-devel.nongnu.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>
To: Igor Mammedov <imammedo@redhat.com>
Cc: "Eduardo Habkost" <ehabkost@redhat.com>,
	"Laszlo Ersek" <lersek@redhat.com>,
	qemu-devel@nongnu.org, "Gerd Hoffmann" <kraxel@redhat.com>,
	"Paolo Bonzini" <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
	"Philippe Mathieu-Daudé" <philmd@redhat.com>,
	"Richard Henderson" <rth@twiddle.net>
Subject: Re: [RFC 0/3] acpi: cphp: add CPHP_GET_CPU_ID_CMD command to cpu hotplug MMIO interface
Date: Thu, 10 Oct 2019 14:15:44 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20191010140934-mutt-send-email-mst@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20191010175754.7c62cf8f@Igors-MacBook-Pro>

On Thu, Oct 10, 2019 at 05:57:54PM +0200, Igor Mammedov wrote:
> > Then we should consider switching acpi to use fw cfg.
> > Or build another interface that can scale.
> 
> Could be an option, it would be a pain to write a driver in AML for fwcfg access though
> (I've looked at possibility to access fwcfg from AML about a year ago and gave up.
> I'm definitely not volunteering for the second attempt and can't even give an estimate
> it it's viable approach).
> 
> But what scaling issue you are talking about, exactly?

Just this: each new thing we add is an ad-hoc data structure with
manually maintained backwards compatibility and no built-in discovery.

fw cfg has built-in discovery and we've finally managed to
handle compatibility reasonably well.

PV is already very problematic.  Spreading PV code all over the place
like this is a very bad idea.  For you CPU hotplug is something that you
keep in mind first of all, but someone bringing up a new platform
already has a steep hill to climb.  Adding tons of custom firmware is
not helping things.

-- 
MST


  reply	other threads:[~2019-10-10 18:24 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 43+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-10-09 13:22 [RFC 0/3] acpi: cphp: add CPHP_GET_CPU_ID_CMD command to cpu hotplug MMIO interface Igor Mammedov
2019-10-09 13:22 ` [RFC 1/3] acpi: cpuhp: fix 'Command data' description is spec Igor Mammedov
2019-10-10 12:33   ` Laszlo Ersek
2019-10-17 15:41     ` Igor Mammedov
2019-10-18 13:24       ` Laszlo Ersek
2019-10-10 13:31   ` Laszlo Ersek
2019-10-10 13:36     ` Laszlo Ersek
2019-10-22 17:17       ` Christophe de Dinechin
2019-10-22 17:37         ` Laszlo Ersek
2019-10-09 13:22 ` [RFC 2/3] acpi: cpuhp: add typical usecases into spec Igor Mammedov
2019-10-10 13:04   ` Laszlo Ersek
2019-10-10 13:15     ` Laszlo Ersek
2019-10-10 14:13   ` Laszlo Ersek
2019-10-18 14:45     ` Igor Mammedov
2019-10-09 13:22 ` [RFC 3/3] acpi: cpuhp: add CPHP_GET_CPU_ID_CMD command Igor Mammedov
2019-10-10 14:56   ` Laszlo Ersek
2019-10-10 15:06     ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2019-10-10 17:23       ` Igor Mammedov
2019-10-10 17:53       ` Laszlo Ersek
2019-10-10 19:26       ` Eduardo Habkost
2019-10-11  8:07         ` Laszlo Ersek
2019-10-18 16:18     ` Igor Mammedov
2019-10-21 13:06       ` Laszlo Ersek
2019-10-22 12:39         ` Laszlo Ersek
2019-10-22 14:42           ` Igor Mammedov
2019-10-22 15:49             ` Laszlo Ersek
2019-10-23 14:59               ` Igor Mammedov
2019-10-24 15:07   ` Philippe Mathieu-Daudé
2019-10-10  9:56 ` [RFC 0/3] acpi: cphp: add CPHP_GET_CPU_ID_CMD command to cpu hotplug MMIO interface Michael S. Tsirkin
2019-10-10 13:39   ` Igor Mammedov
2019-10-10 13:59     ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2019-10-10 15:57       ` Igor Mammedov
2019-10-10 18:15         ` Michael S. Tsirkin [this message]
2019-10-11  7:41           ` Laszlo Ersek
2019-10-10 19:20         ` Eduardo Habkost
2019-10-11  8:01           ` Laszlo Ersek
2019-10-11 13:00             ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2019-10-11 16:13               ` Laszlo Ersek
2019-10-11 10:47           ` Igor Mammedov
2019-10-11  6:54         ` Laszlo Ersek
2019-10-10 14:16     ` Eduardo Habkost
2019-10-10 14:49       ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2019-10-10 17:09       ` Igor Mammedov

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20191010140934-mutt-send-email-mst@kernel.org \
    --to=mst@redhat.com \
    --cc=ehabkost@redhat.com \
    --cc=imammedo@redhat.com \
    --cc=kraxel@redhat.com \
    --cc=lersek@redhat.com \
    --cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
    --cc=philmd@redhat.com \
    --cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
    --cc=rth@twiddle.net \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).