From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.8 required=3.0 tests=HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 16207C4CECE for ; Mon, 14 Oct 2019 15:07:05 +0000 (UTC) Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DF9732133F for ; Mon, 14 Oct 2019 15:07:04 +0000 (UTC) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org DF9732133F Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=redhat.com Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=qemu-devel-bounces+qemu-devel=archiver.kernel.org@nongnu.org Received: from localhost ([::1]:51216 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1iK1w7-0006zP-T3 for qemu-devel@archiver.kernel.org; Mon, 14 Oct 2019 11:07:03 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:55817) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1iK1v3-0005o5-Vr for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 14 Oct 2019 11:05:59 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1iK1v2-0008Ol-1z for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 14 Oct 2019 11:05:57 -0400 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:23991) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1iK1v1-0008NQ-SR for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 14 Oct 2019 11:05:56 -0400 Received: from smtp.corp.redhat.com (int-mx06.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.16]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 86D2018C8929; Mon, 14 Oct 2019 15:05:54 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (ovpn-116-20.phx2.redhat.com [10.3.116.20]) by smtp.corp.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 21E8A5C231; Mon, 14 Oct 2019 15:05:48 +0000 (UTC) Date: Mon, 14 Oct 2019 12:05:47 -0300 From: Eduardo Habkost To: Wei Yang Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2 0/2] refine memory_device_get_free_addr Message-ID: <20191014150547.GR4084@habkost.net> References: <20190730003740.20694-1-richardw.yang@linux.intel.com> <20190913234746.jb5a5vlwl6cebudz@master> <20190914154026-mutt-send-email-mst@kernel.org> <20191012090209.GA6047@richard> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20191012090209.GA6047@richard> X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.79 on 10.5.11.16 X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.6.2 (mx1.redhat.com [10.5.110.70]); Mon, 14 Oct 2019 15:05:54 +0000 (UTC) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] [fuzzy] X-Received-From: 209.132.183.28 X-BeenThere: qemu-devel@nongnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: imammedo@redhat.com, Wei Yang , david@redhat.com, qemu-devel@nongnu.org, "Michael S. Tsirkin" Errors-To: qemu-devel-bounces+qemu-devel=archiver.kernel.org@nongnu.org Sender: "Qemu-devel" On Sat, Oct 12, 2019 at 05:02:09PM +0800, Wei Yang wrote: > On Sat, Sep 14, 2019 at 03:40:41PM -0400, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: > >On Fri, Sep 13, 2019 at 11:47:46PM +0000, Wei Yang wrote: > >> On Tue, Jul 30, 2019 at 08:37:38AM +0800, Wei Yang wrote: > >> >When we iterate the memory-device list to get the available range, it is not > >> >necessary to iterate the whole list. > >> > > >> >1) no more overlap for hinted range if tmp exceed it > >> > > >> >v2: > >> > * remove #2 as suggested by Igor and David > >> > * add some comment to inform address assignment stay the same as before > >> > this change > >> > > >> >Wei Yang (2): > >> > memory-device: not necessary to use goto for the last check > >> > memory-device: break the loop if tmp exceed the hinted range > >> > > >> > hw/mem/memory-device.c | 3 ++- > >> > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) > >> > > >> > >> Would someone take this patch set? > > > >yes looks good to me too. > >Eduardo? > > > > Hmm... I don't see this any where. May I ask the status? Sorry, I hadn't seen Michael's message. Queued on machine-next. Thanks! -- Eduardo