qemu-devel.nongnu.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@redhat.com>
To: Denis Plotnikov <dplotnikov@virtuozzo.com>
Cc: kwolf@redhat.com, den@virtuozzo.com, mst@redhat.com,
	qemu-devel@nongnu.org, mreitz@redhat.com, kraxel@redhat.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] virtio: fix IO request length in virtio SCSI/block #PSBM-78839
Date: Mon, 21 Oct 2019 14:24:55 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20191021132455.GH22659@stefanha-x1.localdomain> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20191018115547.19299-1-dplotnikov@virtuozzo.com>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 4175 bytes --]

On Fri, Oct 18, 2019 at 02:55:47PM +0300, Denis Plotnikov wrote:
> From: "Denis V. Lunev" <den@openvz.org>
> 
> Linux guests submit IO requests no longer than PAGE_SIZE * max_seg
> field reported by SCSI controler. Thus typical sequential read with
> 1 MB size results in the following pattern of the IO from the guest:
>   8,16   1    15754     2.766095122  2071  D   R 2095104 + 1008 [dd]
>   8,16   1    15755     2.766108785  2071  D   R 2096112 + 1008 [dd]
>   8,16   1    15756     2.766113486  2071  D   R 2097120 + 32 [dd]
>   8,16   1    15757     2.767668961     0  C   R 2095104 + 1008 [0]
>   8,16   1    15758     2.768534315     0  C   R 2096112 + 1008 [0]
>   8,16   1    15759     2.768539782     0  C   R 2097120 + 32 [0]
> The IO was generated by
>   dd if=/dev/sda of=/dev/null bs=1024 iflag=direct
> 
> This effectively means that on rotational disks we will observe 3 IOPS
> for each 2 MBs processed. This definitely negatively affects both
> guest and host IO performance.
> 
> The cure is relatively simple - we should report lengthy scatter-gather
> ability of the SCSI controller. Fortunately the situation here is very
> good. VirtIO transport layer can accomodate 1024 items in one request
> while we are using only 128. This situation is present since almost
> very beginning. 2 items are dedicated for request metadata thus we
> should publish VIRTQUEUE_MAX_SIZE - 2 as max_seg.
> 
> The following pattern is observed after the patch:
>   8,16   1     9921     2.662721340  2063  D   R 2095104 + 1024 [dd]
>   8,16   1     9922     2.662737585  2063  D   R 2096128 + 1024 [dd]
>   8,16   1     9923     2.665188167     0  C   R 2095104 + 1024 [0]
>   8,16   1     9924     2.665198777     0  C   R 2096128 + 1024 [0]
> which is much better.
> 
> The dark side of this patch is that we are tweaking guest visible
> parameter, though this should be relatively safe as above transport
> layer support is present in QEMU/host Linux for a very long time.
> The patch adds configurable property for VirtIO SCSI with a new default
> and hardcode option for VirtBlock which does not provide good
> configurable framework.
> 
> Unfortunately the commit can not be applied as is. For the real cure we
> need guest to be fixed to accomodate that queue length, which is done
> only in the latest 4.14 kernel. Thus we are going to expose the property
> and tweak it on machine type level.
> 
> The problem with the old kernels is that they have
> max_segments <= virtqueue_size restriction which cause the guest
> crashing in the case of violation.
> To fix the case described above in the old kernels we can increase
> virtqueue_size to 256 and max_segments to 254. The pitfall here is
> that seabios allows the virtqueue_size-s < 128, however, the seabios
> patch extending that value to 256 is pending.

If I understand correctly you are relying on Indirect Descriptor support
in the guest driver in order to exceed the Virtqueue Descriptor Table
size.

Unfortunately the "max_segments <= virtqueue_size restriction" is
required by the VIRTIO 1.1 specification:

  2.6.5.3.1 Driver Requirements: Indirect Descriptors

  A driver MUST NOT create a descriptor chain longer than the Queue
  Size of the device.

So this idea seems to be in violation of the specification?

There is a bug in hw/block/virtio-blk.c:virtio_blk_update_config() and
hw/scsi/virtio-scsi.c:virtio_scsi_get_config():

  virtio_stl_p(vdev, &blkcfg.seg_max, 128 - 2);

This number should be the minimum of blk_get_max_iov() and
virtio_queue_get_num(), minus 2 for the header and footer.

I looked at the Linux SCSI driver code and it seems each HBA has a
single max_segments number - it does not vary on a per-device basis.
This could be a problem if two host block device with different
max_segments are exposed to the guest through the same virtio-scsi
controller.  Another bug? :(

Anyway, if you want ~1024 descriptors you should set Queue Size to 1024.
I don't see a spec-compliant way of doing it otherwise.  Hopefully I
have overlooked something and there is a nice way to solve this.

Stefan

[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 488 bytes --]

  reply	other threads:[~2019-10-21 13:26 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-10-18 11:55 [PATCH] virtio: fix IO request length in virtio SCSI/block #PSBM-78839 Denis Plotnikov
2019-10-21 13:24 ` Stefan Hajnoczi [this message]
2019-10-22  4:01   ` Denis Lunev
2019-10-23 14:17     ` Stefan Hajnoczi
2019-10-23 14:37       ` Denis Lunev
2019-10-23  9:13   ` Denis Plotnikov
2019-10-23 21:50   ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2019-10-23 21:28 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2019-10-24 11:34   ` Denis Lunev
2019-11-06 12:03     ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2019-11-13 12:38       ` Denis Plotnikov
2019-11-13 13:18         ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2019-11-14 15:33           ` Denis Plotnikov
2019-11-25  9:16       ` Denis Plotnikov
2019-12-05  7:59         ` Denis Plotnikov
2019-12-13 12:24           ` [PING] " Denis Plotnikov
2019-12-13 12:40         ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2019-11-12 10:03   ` Stefan Hajnoczi

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20191021132455.GH22659@stefanha-x1.localdomain \
    --to=stefanha@redhat.com \
    --cc=den@virtuozzo.com \
    --cc=dplotnikov@virtuozzo.com \
    --cc=kraxel@redhat.com \
    --cc=kwolf@redhat.com \
    --cc=mreitz@redhat.com \
    --cc=mst@redhat.com \
    --cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).